User talk:Andros 1337/Archive 2

Accepting articles

I have been working on the article Hubbell Water Heaters and has been denied multiple times despite having several third party references. Looking at the Bradford White page which is in the exact same industry, they only have one reference (a personal press release), yet you reverted the tag that was recently added stating they are not notable because they do not have enough references.

This confuses me because Wikipedia: Notability clearly states- "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason. Sources of evidence include recognized peer-reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally."

Can you explain this please? Because there seems to be some contradiction. Thanks Carrierc (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Bradford White has a much larger market share than Hubbell (third in the industry behind A.O. Smith and Rheem), so I think because the company has a significant market share seems to indicate that the company is notable in the industry. ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 20:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, but that still doesn't answer my question. Where does it say on Wikipedia that a market share is a notable source? Given that Bradford White is a private company (according to their page), how would their market share be a contributing factor to their notability? And where do you find that information? Carrierc (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Red

Fair enough; the reason I included it is because of its use in modern liberal political movements, such as the Liberal Party of Canada. I'm not too concerned if its removed or argued against, however. Mnmazur (talk)

FAC for Boeing 757

Hi Andros 1337, as someone who contributed to the A-Class review of Boeing 757, you might be interested in commenting at its Featured Article candidacy, which is now open at: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Boeing 757/archive1. Any input is welcome. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 22:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:737 MAX Wingtip Device.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:737 MAX Wingtip Device.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blossom PPG.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Blossom PPG.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zhane Power Rangers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Zhane Power Rangers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blossom PPG.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Blossom PPG.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Snoozlepet (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Snoozlepet (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blossom PPG.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Blossom PPG.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagremover disputes

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Tagremover disputes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Tagremover (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request closed as withdrawn

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that an arbitration case request, named Tagremover disputes, in which you were named as a party has been withdrawn by the filing party. The commenting arbitrators felt that the community was able to handle this issue at the current time and it was withdrawn by the filing party.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Galaxy Rangers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy Rangers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Ryulong (琉竜) 02:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image is from Seijuu Sentai Gingaman and not Lost Galaxy.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Magna Defender.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Magna Defender.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PR lists

If you haven't been following, a few lists of PR characters have been put up for deletion. AlienX2009 seems to not be wanting to do this, but would you mind starting to merge the list pages for the post-Zordon seasons? As you can see Lost Galaxy has already been done, but there's still Lightspeed Rescue through Samurai that need merging. If you do go through with this, please remember to say the pages you are merging in the history of the new page so people's contributions can be properly tracked.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fantasy class

Template:Fantasy class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Astros4477 (Talk) 18:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Destiny class

Template:Destiny class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Astros4477 (Talk) 18:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Conquest class

Template:Conquest class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Astros4477 (Talk) 18:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rheem logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rheem logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:33, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rheem

You know, you could just have asked me... Now we all have to go through the complexities of a DRV (which is inappropriate anyway, Requests for undeletion is the board you should have posted this on). Yunshui 雲‍水 07:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Colored text

You know that colored text can cause confusion with default red/blue links. Why don't you try a table for Valley Metro Bus (Phoenix) that would be sortable by number, type and operator. This also gives much more functionality and clarity. Remember that some people have vision problems so adding the operator name, in some standard format, as well as providing accessability would also be sortable. This is not yet completed and I have left a few things for you to add and cleanup.

No.	Name	Type	Operator
	Valley Metro LINK (Main St/Power Rd)	Local	Veolia-RPTA
	Valley Metro LINK (Country Club/Arizona Ave)	Local	Veolia-RPTA
0	Central Ave	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
1	Washington/Jefferson St	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
3	Van Buren St	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
7	7th Street	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
8	7th Avenue	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
10	Roosevelt/Grant/32nd St	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
12	12th Street	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
13	Buckeye Rd.	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
15	15th Avenue	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
16	16th/32nd Street	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
17	McDowell Rd	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
17A	Avondale via McDowell Rd	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
19	19th Avenue	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
27	27th Avenue	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
29	Thomas Road	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
30	University Dr	Local	Veolia-RPTA
35	35th Avenue	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
39	40th Street	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
40	Main St	Local	Veolia-RPTA
41	Indian School Rd	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
43	43rd Avenue	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
44	44th St/Tatum Blvd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
45	Broadway	Local	Veolia-RPTA
48	48th St/Rio Salado Pkwy	Local	Veolia-Tempe
50	Camelback Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
51	51st Avenue	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
52	Roeser Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
56	Priest Drive	Local	Veolia-Tempe
59	59th Avenue	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
60	Bethany Home Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
61	Southern Ave	Local	Veolia-RPTA
62	Hardy/Guadalupe	Local	Veolia-Tempe
65	Mill/Kyrene Rd	Local	Veolia-Tempe
66	Mill/Kyrene	Local	Veolia-Tempe
67	67th Avenue	Local	First Transit-Phoenix
70	Glendale/24th Street	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
72	Scottsdale/Rural Rd	Local	Veolia-Tempe
77	Baseline Rd	Local	Veolia-Tempe
80	Northern Ave	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
81	Hayden/McClintock Dr	Local	Veolia-Tempe
90	Dunlap/Cave Creek Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
96	Dobson Rd	Local	Veolia-RPTA
104	Alma School Rd	Local	Veolia-RPTA
106	Peoria/Shea Blvd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
108	Elliot Rd	Local	Veolia-Tempe
112	Country Club/Arizona Ave	Local	Veolia-RPTA
120	Mesa Dr	Local	Veolia-RPTA
122	Cactus Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
128	Stapley Dr	Local	Veolia-RPTA
136	Gilbert Road	Local	Veolia-RPTA
138	Thunderbird Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
154	Greenway Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
156	Chandler Blvd/Williams Field Road	Local	Veolia-RPTA
170	Bell Rd	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
184	Power Rd	Local	Veolia-RPTA
186	Union Hills Dr.	Local	Veolia-Phoenix
251	51st Avenue	Local
277	East Mesa (seasonal)	Local	Veolia-RPTA
511	Tempe/Scottsdale Airpark	Express	Veolia-RPTA
514	Scottsdale	Express	Veolia-Tempe
520	Tempe	Express	Veolia-Tempe
521	Tempe	Express	Veolia-Tempe
522	Tempe	Express	Veolia-Tempe
531	Mesa/Gilbert	Express	Veolia-RPTA
533	Mesa	Express	Veolia-RPTA
535	Red Mountain/Downtown	Express	Veolia-RPTA
541	Chandler	Express	Veolia-RPTA
542	Chandler/Downtown	Express	Veolia-RPTA
562	Goodyear/Downtown	Express
563	Buckeye	Express
571	Surprise	Express
573	Northwest Valley/Downtown	Express
575	Northwest Valley/Loop 101/Downtown	Express
685	Gila Bend Regional Connector	Express
GL	Grand Avenue Limited	Express	First Transit-Phoenix

Great idea, thanks! Will get to it right now. ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 22:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Abandoned' template documentation subpage

Hi. Could you please delete User:Andros 1337/Infobox Power Rangers Character 2.0/doc? It appears to be unused (you deleted the 'parent' page) and it's cluttering up Category:Documentation subpages without corresponding pages. Thanks. Revent (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Andros 1337

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30Sep13 crash on Blue line

Talk:Chicago_'L'_rolling_stock#30Sep13_crash_on_Blue_line may interest you. I am also telling User_talk:CoconutHead65 and User_talk:12.168.128.77 Sammy D III (talk) 16:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zodiac Seats U.S. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] fleet upgrades, as well as on the [[Boeing 737 Next Generation#737-900ER|Boeing 737-900ER]] fleet), while American is using the competing CL 3620 seat by [[Recaro]] on its A319 and A321 fleets. [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: ABQ Ride fleet

Hello. It doesn't seem like they have specific buses that are used for either the 40 or 250. So far, the D-ride has been covered by 2 300-series buses (usually a later number like 337, 338, etc.), the same as when there was less than 2 usable 400-series buses. The Airport Express seems to be mostly covered by a 300-series bus, though they have recently used a 900-series for part of the day.

I don't have any specific knowledge of ABQ Ride's plans, but I seriously doubt that they will be spending money on wraps for buses that may be needed elsewhere in the fleet. I also think that if they planned on using special wraps, they would have had those buses painted with the route-specific branding so that they didn't have to pay for both the paint job and wrapping.

If you're interested in knowing what buses are assigned to a route at any time, the ABQ Ride app shows bus numbers on the live tracking. So far, I've seen as many as 10 600-series buses out at a time, and the pace of using the 600-series over the 300-series seems to be accelerating. So far, I haven't noticed a pattern to what 300-series are on the road, but I will edit the Wikipedia page if I happen to find out what numbers of the 300-series will be retired.

I'm really hoping that ABQ Ride expands the fleet and service soon because some routes are becoming extremely over-crowded to the point of consecutive runs not picking up passengers. I also expected this new order to be called the 500-series because the 300s and 400s were taken and that would have been the closest numbering to the year they entered the fleet. If you happen to hear anything about future orders or the logic behind the numbering of the new buses, I would love to hear about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.119.168.246 (talk) 17:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AAMCO logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AAMCO logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jazzbox

Template:Jazzbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red

I see that you deleted fire and beauty as common associations with the color red due to not being in a specific survey. However, these are still very common associations (especially fire) as stated in the citations I provided. Therefore, I personally believe they are worthy of mention and should not be excluded from the article. One survey isn't enough to determine the common associations of the color. ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 01:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Andros,

Thanks for your constructive comments. There's a history to the list of associations in the major color articles. A few years ago, people were adding any associations they wanted to the color articles, and there was a list of several dozen associations for red, some of which were logical, some rather far-fetched, most quite personal and subjective. At that point I and other editors standardized the format for color articles, with a short list of the strongest associations of each color, according to the surveys published by Eva Heller. More detail follows in the article. Also, we chose only those associations which the surveys published by Eva Heller showed were the strongest. For example, "heat" is also associated by many people with yellow and orange, but red is the strongest, with 47 percent. If we put every association of a color into the lead, it would be much too long and would probably be of little value.

You proposed adding "fire" and "beauty". I think fire falls under "heat", so I think it is covered in the lead, but we could say "heat and fire" as one item. If you have some specific examples of red being associated with fire, you should put them into the body of the article. "Beauty" is more difficult, because by definition it's entirely subjective. It's not mentioned at all in the survey, because everyone has a different idea of what beauty is, and I don't think there's any agreement that red is the most beautiful color. Do you have some data that shows that red is considered by the public more beautiful than any other color? If not, I don't think it would belong in the lead. If you have some examples of red associated with beauty, they can go into the body of the article.

I welcome your further thoughts and ideas on how to improve the article.

SiefkinDR (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Powerpuff Girl's colors

I would just go with pink green and blue per WP:NPOV unless you have a reliable source saying otherwise, the last thing I want is a heated argument between two editors in the future on what exact color is right and what one isn't that involves the characters. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps for Bubbles and Buttercup we can use light blue and light green, which they obviously are. Light blue and light green are more general terms rather than specific shades. ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 04:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I see no harm in that then =). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bombardier Innovia APM 200

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bombardier Innovia APM 200, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JBH (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shea Homes Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shea Homes Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:System Sensor logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:System Sensor logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jujutacular (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kidde logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kidde logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Garage door opener manufacturers

Category:Garage door opener manufacturers, which you created, has been nominated for renaming & expanding scope. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tj morphed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tj morphed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RedSpaceRanger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RedSpaceRanger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pink Space Ranger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pink Space Ranger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yellow Space Ranger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yellow Space Ranger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Space Ranger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Space Ranger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Turbo Ranger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Turbo Ranger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gillig Buses (City of Phoenix)

Hi there! Apologies it took me so long to get back to you on this. Unfortunately I've not been able to figure out what transmission is used in the Gilligs just yet. I've been on 5121 a few times so far, and can say that the shift selector appeared to be identical to the one used on the 2014 C40LFRs, however I don't yet have a confirmation if they are in fact using the B400R. InfiniteFifty (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Fleet

Hi again! I've been trying to see if I can find out more about the cutaway fleet, as normally I'm focused on the heavy duty vehicles like the New Flyers.

What I've found is that Phoenix Transit has auctioned a large number of cutaways, which are the StarTrans cutaways of E450 vehicles, all previously registered on "G" plates, with number ranges I would expect for the Public Transit department. So far all of these StarTrans vehicles appear to have been numbered from about 1480-1505. 1480 is the lowest fleet number I've seen auctioned and 1505 is the highest. It's entirely possible that vehicles lower in the range (to about 1460) have also been auctioned, and I just haven't seen them. The most recent auction on these was in late February of this year.

I've also found a number of StarTrans vehicles with fleet numbers in the 34xx and 35xx range, but the interior of those indicate they could have been Dial-a-ride vehicles, as they have at least 3 wheelchair positions with very limited seating. I thought I would at least pass this along, as it could help reduce confusion between the DAR fleet and the circulator fleet.

Additionally, a video from the city which was made to highlight the opening of the transit centre at Desert Sky shows a regional connector on Route 685 pulling in, which has the fleet number 1548. Currently the fleet number for these are just listed as "Unknown" - but I don't know how many of these there are, so I didn't add this into the page yet. InfiniteFifty (talk) 03:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Pokemon Sun Boxart.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pokemon Sun Boxart.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Circle K Logo 2016.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Circle K Logo 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andros 1337. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andros 1337. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please come and comment

Proposed deletion of List of Boeing 787 orders and deliveries

The article List of Boeing 787 orders and deliveries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Why is this here? WIKIPEDIAISNOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smiths Detection

Hello Andros 1337,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Smiths Detection for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Bensci54 (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smiths Detection

Hello, Andros 1337. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Smiths Detection, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

LibraryGurl (talk) 17:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karone Astronema.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karone Astronema.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Power Rangers Karone.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Power Rangers Karone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RockyBlueZeo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RockyBlueZeo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yellow Zeo Ranger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yellow Zeo Ranger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mesa/Tempe/RPTA Fleet Update

Thanks for the update. I've been trying to keep across the fleet news as best I can, but it's been pretty difficult with the joint procurement situation as well as how many orders are currently in progress between New Flyer, Gillig, ElDorado and ARBOC. I've been trying to keep up with the CPTDB thread and cross check what people are saying there with what I'm hearing and reading in the City of Phoenix T&ISC and RPTA meeting packets, but it has still been a challenge.

I'm thinking you may be correct about the new Gilligs being sent to Tempe. From what I've heard / been told (and also seen on the road) Tempe have been having some reliability issues with some of their older New Flyer vehicles.

I've also been told that Tempe has fewer vehicles, and have no choice but to run them longer / harder than Mesa, which might contribute. It also means that each vehicle which goes down has a bigger impact on their ability to keep service running smoothly, which First have already had enough of an issue with in the past two years or so.

In regards to Phoenix, It looks that the non-RAPID Xcelsiors are split between the North and South divisions. Most of the North division vehicles seem to stay on Route 50. I'm seeing 8101 as active this morning on Route 70, so it appears these have now all been delivered.

Additionally, in going through the GTFS data this morning, I'm seeing vehicles numbered 7169 and 7170 active on the I-17 and I-10E RAPID routes. I mention this because the fleet page doesn't currently list anything above the order for 7157-7165 in the XN60s. This is confusing as the I-17 is a North division route, while the I-10E is South division. I can only assume these are also XN60s? InfiniteFifty (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Metro Route 140-Ray

Hi again!

I'm pretty much in agreement with you on Route 140 being First-RPTA and coming from Mesa or Tempe. I figured when making the edit I would reserve judgement until someone confirms officially that either Phoenix or the RPTA are going to operate it.

Seeing as we're less than 20 days from that route coming into service, I imagine someone will do that soon. Alternatively, I could always just send an email and see what I can find out.

InfiniteFifty (talk) 02:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Metro: Tempe/Mesa DE60LFR

Just a little heads up, I'm beginning to notice that the DE60LFR buses, previously based in Tempe and seen quite often on Route 72, are starting to show up on Route 72 again, since the October service changes.

I'm not sure if these vehicles were transferred again, but I thought it was interesting, and possibly something to know with the recent New Flyer order.

InfiniteFifty (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andros 1337. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Valentine's Day food has been nominated for discussion

Category:Valentine's Day food, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ibadibam (talk) 07:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blossom PPG.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blossom PPG.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 05:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adam Green Zeo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Green Zeo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chelsea Food Services for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chelsea Food Services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Food Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wolfson5 (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avetik Chalabyan article up for deletion

Hi Andros 1337! About 2 years ago I wrote a biography of a living person article [Chalabyan]. The article has been recently marked as up for deletion. Any advice on why this might be happening, how to address it or what to improve would really be appreciated. Obviously, your vote as an experienced editor on Wiki would really go a long way to make sure it's not deleted.

Thanks in advance for your attention to the matter.

Alice Ananian (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andros 1337. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andros 1337. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zodiac Seats U.S. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zodiac Seats U.S. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zodiac Seats U.S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dixie-Narco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dixie-Narco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie-Narco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Breast Cancer Research Foundation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Breast Cancer Research Foundation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Map suggestion

I made a small suggestion to you here: File talk:Albuquerque-Santa Fe-Las Vegas CSA.svg.

Thanks for your beautiful work; I wish I could do that kind of stuff. Un school 01:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]