User talk:SynergyStar

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SynergyStar.

International alliance

Sandbox

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox

http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dabfinder.py?page=title

http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Checklinks

{{convert|5235|nmi|km}} {{convert|226000|lb|kg|abbr=on}} {{convert|77000|lbf|kN|abbr=on}} {{convert|104000|to|114000|lbf|kN|abbr=on}} {{convert|478900|usgal|L}} {{convert||-||mm|1|abbr=on}} {{main|link|l1=alt title)}} {{See also|link|l1=alt title)}}

Testing etc.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pathoschild/Scripts/Regex_menu_framework

>[http://

>{{cite web|url=http://

{{Harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=–}} <br/> {{Harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=}} {{Cite book|last1=|first1=|title=|year=|publisher=|location=|isbn=|ref=harv}}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Peer_review

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Academy/Checklist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CITE#Citation_templates_and_tools

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_tools

http://toolserver.org/~holek/cite-gen/

777 FAC

767 FAC

FAC list

Air Canada edits

Recently you have made numerous good faith edits to the Air Canada article, some of which added unreferenced detail. I suggest you revisit those edits and provide appropriate references or delete the added detail. Your attention to the article is much appreciated. --Rosetown (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the suggestion, may I point out that the edits I made, mainly expanding the lead, are all summarizing/rearranging existing information that is in the article body. Those areas likely would share the same references, which I may get around to if I have the time, but I am not the originator of those references. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was too fast off the mark, and didn't properly peruse your many edits. Regards --Rosetown (talk) 05:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File

File:Mercedes S-Guard.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:MercedesS-Guardarmouredcar.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:MercedesS-Guardarmouredcar.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Engines list

PW4000 GE90 Trent 800 PW4084 GE90-77B Trent877 GE90-115B GE90-94B PW4090 Trent 895 GE90-85B GE90-110B1 GEnx

LS article

I don't understand why press kits here on wikipedia are so frowned upon considering the press and media outlets get much of their information from them. I also think it's very important people find the information they are looking for rather than just ensure the article is in good standing at wikipedia. I understand that most don't want to read a lengthy article but some people such as myself and other car enthusiasts do appreciate and value knowing technical details on a topic. And I wonder has any automotive article reached Good Standing? Thanks 69.65.224.246 (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a list of articles which have reached good standing: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles#Example_articles You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and certainly you have valid points, but in my experience the guidelines have the final say. Any contributions that have longevity on this site need to abide by them or they will eventually get deleted by someone, particularly certain wiki editors who focus entirely on patrolling articles and enforcing guidelines. So in the end it's best to just work with them IMO. It is relatively easy to find a press release, but with some time spent reading reliable third-party references one can usually find the information from a neutral source. Otherwise one can look at for instance Audi and see that the use of press information makes the article suspect in the eyes of editors here. Regards SynergyStar (talk) 04:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. I removed the caps on all of the Toyota trademarks, there's really no point in leaving some but not others. I'll probably add a few more details to the LS section and more or less retire from wikipedia for the most part in the next week, there really isn't that much more I can think of adding. I have noticed some of the Audi and to a lesser extent Mercedes articles appear to be written by someone working at the company. 69.65.224.246 (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. If you later think of making more contributions, that would be appreciated; we need as many dedicated auto editors as possible. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you wouldn't mind copying the relevant paragraph on these new unique options to the talk page or some other location where I could check it over? I've never made a purchase on Amazon, or I'd check the page preview there. Guessing search keywords to try and find a sentence from pg. 184 gets a little old. Nevard (talk) 03:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I quoted the sentence in the reference for your convenience: "Additional options include: climate control front seats, parking sonar, power sunroof, power seats with memory, power rear sunshade, air purifier, rear seat heat and massage, power door closers, and dual level heated seats. Lexus incorporated the new technology to make driving the LS 430 more comfortable and pleasurable. Even with the navigation system and high end audio, the controls were still easy to operate. Apart from the Mark Levinson stereo, many of these items had been options in Japan for several years (a number could be found on the Celsior)." Thus the preceding referred to the power sunshade, adjustable seats, power door closers etc. The sentence states just that they have been found on prior JDM cars; this likely reflects the chauffeured JDM market for cars such as the Century, President etc. SynergyStar (talk) 03:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers- I did have concerns with the implications that these features had been provided for the first time in the world by Toyota in the Japanese market (rather than previously only been provided in the Century, Crown, Celsior but not in the LS)- but I can't find any such statement in the current text. Nice work. Nevard (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo, glad to help. SynergyStar (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

I have done the GA Reassessment of theLexus article as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to be great and meet all the WP:GA Criteria except for several dead links in the reference section. I am notifying you as the primary editor of this. I have placed the article on hold for a week pending fixes of these references. If you need more time or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings H1nkles, thanks for conducting the GA sweeps reassessment of Lexus. In accordance with your suggestions, I've replaced the defunct links. Thanks again for your guidance. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 23:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Planetarium and others

Boeing 367-80 Boeing 707 Boeing 727 Boeing 757 Boeing 767 Boeing 787 WP:GAN

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles/Popular_pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Popular_pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airlines/Popular_pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships/Popular_pages

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-11-09/Features and admins

Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-01-09/Featured_content

File:JAL Mileage Bank card.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JAL Mileage Bank card.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC) ----[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 06:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SynergyStar. You have new messages at Talk:Cathay Pacific.
Message added Aviator006 (talk) 10:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, SynergyStar. You have new messages at Talk:Japan Airlines.
Message added Aviator006 (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, SynergyStar. You have new messages at OSX's talk page.
Message added OSX (talk • contributions) 14:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, SynergyStar! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 777

You realize of course that the citation/bibliography templates have many bugs including the listing of coauthors, that is why many experienced editors have abandoned the template system entirely. FWiW 02:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC).

Ah, thanks for the info. The switch to templates was merely in response to suggestions made by the GA and FA reviews. I did some research/testing and was able to format the templates used to allow listing of coauthors in first name, last name order, while linked, just as in the web citations. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation Contest

Hi SynergyStar! This note is to inform you that your Aviation Contest submissions page has been archived from the previous round! You are now free to add submissions for this round! Note: This next round will run from January through February, so feel free to update your submission page with work from both months! Thanks, and happy editing! (Note: I will not be watching this space. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Contest discussion page. -SidewinderX (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind giving Vietnam Airlines a look?

Hello, I have been working on the article Vietnam Airlines for nearly two months and so I would like comments and feedbacks about my effort, could you please give it a look? Thank you in advance Sp33dyphil 23:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on the GA review page and article page. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 19:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for an eyes-over

Hi SynergyStar,

I'm currently tending to the History of British Airways article, which I've nominated as a FAC, I was hoping as you've previously put aviation articles up to FA status you might have the time to point out anything to help improve the article; this is my first FAC ever, so I'm still learning quite a bit of the new guidelines and rules differing from the GAN process I'm more familiar with. What assistance you can bring will be much appreciated.

Thanks, Kyteto (talk) 17:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation and message! Having worked on the British Airways article history section and other areas, I'm pleased to see how the History article has improved. I'll give it a closer read as soon as I can and make comments. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bcal logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bcal logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_experience_feedback/New_features

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:OldReviewedPages

Thanks! SynergyStar (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MiszaBot config whitespace changes

Hi,

Regarding this edit: please see User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo, which states:

The bot expects to see only one parameter per line. The closing }} must be on its own line. There must be no leading spaces before the pipes. If you drop out the newlines used in the above example, e.g. by wrapping the template invocation onto a single line, the bot may not do what you expect.

As such, I've undone this edit. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thx for the info! SynergyStar (talk) 17:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Awards list

Hello, SynergyStar. You have new messages at OSX's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Invitation

Hello User:SynergyStar, You and a number of others, are invited by User:Sp33dyphil to help him cleanup and significantly improve the articles that he’d edited and will edit. The articles involved are airline alliances, such as SkyTeam, Oneworld and Star Alliance. He will be improving and expanding shoe and clothes manufacturing companies, namely Puma AG, Addidas and Nike, Inc.. Airline articles will also be edited, along with Australian rules football and related clubs. You do not nee’ to know these subjects; but you could help

copyedit the articles, as well as improving the English in the involved further.
format the references by inserting citation templates. Please go to WP:CITET, or go to his contributions page to see how he has been carrying out this job.
add appropriate and relevant pictures and media deemed necessary.
merge and tighten paragraphs. Since there are numerous one- and two-sentence paragraphs, merging these together helps editors afterwards add information.
wikification.

Please disregard the following section if you are busy. Only concentrate on the jobs above.

If you have time, you could further help by:

adding pictures/media of the involved subjects to Wiki Commons.
bringing together quotes regarding those who direct or hold significant relationships with organisations such as Greenpeace, SkyTeam, Oneworld, Star Alliance, Puma AG, Adidas, Nike, Inc. and Australian rules football/soccer clubs.
finding press releases, news articles, etc. for Star Alliance and Vietnam Airlines, which don’t have a lot of information during their early days.

Once you have embarked on the activities above, please drop User:Sp33dyphil a message at his user page.

And of course, if you have any jobs for Sp33dyphil, just drop him a message.

“

No pain, no gain.

”

Please distribute this message among other Wikipedians

Thx. SynergyStar (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 767 request

Hey SynergyStar! Hope you are doing well in early 2011. If you have time and the interest, could you help with improvements on the Boeing 767 article. The article is undergoing a peer review now and we're trying to make changes and fix things. If you can't help or something, that's fine too. Take care. -fnlayson (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the well wishes!!! Very kind invitation, I'll try to pitch in when I can. Best, SynergyStar (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate what you're doing. Earlier today, I started editing in between your edits and saw repeated images and removed a couple. I tried to go back and fix. I'll try to stay out of the way while you are doing edits. I'll try to add reference to the accident entries that need it. That seems to be the last area needing references. -fnlayson (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement and support!!! I've given the article some polishing, keeping in mind the peer review's comments on photo variety, plus using the FA examples. Looking better; after the refs are aligned for format and consistency, and the hull loss list condensed or split, the article may be ready for GAR. SynergyStar (talk) 06:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks for the cleanup that you did. I've done some reference formatting myself. I hope we can give this article a GA-status in two/three days. Any suggestions of what I should do to further improve it? Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(I love Wikipedia!)} 00:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you too for all your efforts to improve the article!!! I'm making suggestions on the talk page. Regards SynergyStar (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey the 767 received GA yesterday. :) Thanks for the hard work referencing, adding details and so forth. -Fnlayson (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent news! Glad to help. Thanks to you as well for helping reach GA status. It's great to see the project increase its share of higher quality articles. SynergyStar (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwings

		Wikiwings
		I, Sp33dyphil, award you this Wikiwings for your outstanding efforts and precious help in improving aviation-related pages, especially Boeing 767. You truely deserve them! Keep up the good work! Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(I love Wikipedia!)} 09:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)\|[reply]

Wow, thank you for this wonderful honor, I am really touched. Thank you and glad to help!!! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You truly deserve the honour and I'm happy to present it to you. Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(I love Wikipedia!)} 21:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus A330

I've done a lot of expansion to Airbus A330. I now need someone to help me polish it for WP:FAC, so I though you might interested. Sp33dyphil ^(Talk) ^{(Contributions)}^{(I love Wikipedia!)} 06:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to chip in where I can. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the article, it has undergone a major expansion, great work!!! Right now it looks to have a number of dedicated editors who are helping out. A good template may be the GA-class Airbus A380, which I've worked on. Currently the article seems to be in good hands for further improvements. Regarding the referencing templates issue, I've had experience with that and wish to stay out of further debates (IIRC on Boeing 777 there was the cite web template, then it was completely removed one-by-one, then cite book added, harv refs, etc., and argued about).

In my experience there are many article reviews where the use of templates is suggested, but it's not always agreed on, and it seems to me that the main point is consistency throughout the article, of whatever system is being used. SynergyStar (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind popping into the article to see anything's wrong with it; it's close to the FA-status. Also, I can't seem to figure out an alt text for the carbon brake picture. Thanks Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 06:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse the delayed reply, I have been very busy. Checked out the alt text for the carbon brake and it seems to be added, usually it's just a description of the picture itself, no need to repeat the caption portion (reason why carbon brakes are favoured). Regards SynergyStar (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	I feel really honoured to present you this special Barnstar for your outstanding work in automobile- and aviation-related articles. You are really an inspiration :) Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 01:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you again!!! May I give you a compliment as well, your work on aviation articles is great too and I wish you success in your nomination efforts. SynergyStar (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. You deserve it. Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 06:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwings

Many thanks for the Wikiwings award you presented to me. Good luck on whatever you are working on Sp33dyphil ^{(T • C • I love Wikipedia!)} 02:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're truly welcome, and congrats again on the successful GA nomination. SynergyStar (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation barnstar

		The Citation Barnstar
		For your work on finding replacements for dead references on Boeing 777, I hereby award you the Citation Barnstar. You thoroughly deserve it – keep up your fantastic work! --Sp33dyphil ^{Ready • to • Rumble} 09:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind acknowledgment!! SynergyStar (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great review

Agree with almost all of your upgrades. Very shrewd and helpful prose upgrades. And I cut the panorama.

Except, I think the last thing we need is more in flight images of the airplane. :-)

TCO (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help, even though I'm rather swamped at the moment I thought that the article could benefit from those suggestions. The panorama picture is very nice, detailed and rich, I'd be tempted to keep it except maybe on a factory or city article. Other images are up to the editor(s)...thanks for all your hard work improving the article! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 06:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're a good man. Really like those picture upgrades. Thing is really starting to look crisp in layout and organization.

I kinda don't agree with Sandy that the article makes or breaks on how many "howevers" she can find. It's definitely not a complete mess, and is largely very smooth. Sure, we can find some small things like that. But in the past, she has resisted the characterization that FA is mostly about MOS dash rules and extremely fine prose reviews. That we should and do look at the content (comprehensiveness and emphasis and story). So I really don't think the article should live or die on that. But of course, it's fine to work on it and why not improve it.

I think the main problem from a "civilian" standpoint is making sense of all the letters and numbers and terms. Some of that is indemic to he subject. Yet, it has improved a lot over the past few weeks. I think the more we can do on that front, the more we make major improvement to the article.

In that vein, I think the first two sections of the article, read a little too much as a mystery story and too confusing with the co-evolution of the 330, 340 (and even 320) out of the 300. I think some of this is because the text was similar in both articles. The other thing is the variuous terms changing over time (e.g. TA-9). Think a little stronger topic sentence structure at the front would alleviate the reader who has to wade several paras to find out that the TA-9 we've been hearing about becomes the 330. The other thing that would be great would be some simple flow chart or timeline (probably easiest displayed centered and wide, on top of background, that lists the different names and versions. Just an aid for the reader if he forgets what a TA-9 or a B-10 is.

I'm gonna stay out of it, as I've done enough and I really think it better now for me to do so. but just had to share the thoughts.

Again...really starting to look sharp. I've read the other plane FAs and think this one would be a good addition to the fleet!TCO (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your diligence. It's a a unique challenge to make an aviation article accessible to the general public. I agree that the narrative could be made clearer and a diagram sounds like a great idea. The review process for this article has now taken over one month which is rather long from past experience. Sometimes I feel that before the nomination is listed, particularly after recent failures, there can be a more thorough preparation. Otherwise it can seem somewhat rough and there isn't enough time to polish the article. However a lot of progress often occurs with these types of reviews. I still think that given that the past reviews were only a month or two ago some reviewers may be jaded by seeing the nomination be submitted again so soon. Still everyone is trying to make the best judgment. Best SynergyStar (talk) 23:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't get Tony, Wehwalt, Malleus, or Mike (prose superstars) to proof it. So I am going over it again. Actually, am finding a lot of Sandy's complaints and am fixing them. Should be a lot of rivets sanded down when I get done. I did make the diagram as well. (Of course now I understand the danged plane also...I am "general public"...but after messing with it, ya learn.) Did not realize that the thing had been up a month ago.TCO (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

That edit that you made on Boeing 757 was terrific, adding so much information in one go. I salute you, keep up your good work. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 00:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm message! SynergyStar (talk) 01:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

You did it again! Thanks to your work on Boeing 767. I'm astounded by your massive additions of text, some of which you added in one go. Wow After looking at your work, I'm got quite excited about the prospects of a readable and high-quality encyclopedia. I hope you're planning to promote the article to FA status, because I think your effort is really worthy of the Star. To spread the Wikilove, like what I'm doing now, please award someone who is worthy of one a barnstar. Thanks a lot. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 01:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I'm humbled by your honor. SynergyStar (talk) 22:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any future plans?

Hi Synergy, I'm posting this message out of curiosity regarding any future plans you might have for the encyclopedia. As you might be aware of, the last two months saw a large number of aircraft articles being promoted to GA status, *partly* because of my effort. At the same time, I see that you're working on Boeing 757 ATM. I'm beginning to slow down the process of expanding articles to GA status, and have instead focused on working on articles that are already GA status with the ultimate aim of seeing them to FA status.

There are two points I'd like to ask you:

if, you have any intentions at all, what articles (besides Boeing 757) would you like to expand on before nominating them for GA status, and
what aviation-related sources (books, DVDs, magazines, etc.) you have access to. The reason why I'm asking this is because I'm wondering if you and I have common sources so we could work on a particular article. I have access to a large book collection, including the Warbird Tech and Airliner Tech series, in addition to X Secret Project books by Tony Buttler. Any comments? Do you think this collaboration would work at all? Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 09:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your diligent efforts! Yes, there are quite a few GAs now for the project. Right now I'm working on 757, and plan on GA nomination shortly. Aside from that, I'm not planning on further GA noms for the near future...perhaps airline articles or some other topic area could be a later focus. Additionally, 767 which is already GA, could be improved further. As for sources, I usually try to find them at area libraries or online. I have read several of the Airliner Tech series, which is a good resource for several jetliners such as 747-400 and L-1011. For now though, I'm taking it slow, usually an article at a time, particularly as detailed improvements can be painstaking. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 18:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I think the best way to go is to GAN 757, before working on the L-1011. I have a book about the Airbus A340, so I think it'll be pretty handy if you decide to work on it. As for timescale, do you have any ideas? Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 23:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I hereby present you the Original Barnstar for your exceptional effort on improving the article Boeing 767. I feel very pleased that there are people like you who share the same vision as I do, that is, delivering comprehensive and free information to the world. The momentum is gathering, don't let it stop now. Please give someone who is worthy of one a barnstar today to show your appreciation for their work, just like what I'm doing now. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SynergyStar, you are really filling in the 767 article. Keep up the good work. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fnlayson for the support and your help! It may be possible for the article to undergo review soon. SynergyStar (talk) 06:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Qantasplanes (Talk!) 22:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Boeing 757

The article Boeing 757 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boeing 757 for comments about the article. Well done! Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 19:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nathan2055, thank you for conducting the GA review and for your comments, it is much appreciated!!! Thanks again. Happy editing! SynergyStar (talk) 18:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article promotion

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Boeing 757 a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 15:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the congratulatory comments! SynergyStar (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

767

Hi, I left a few comments at WP:GOCE/FA. I went through the first few sections a few days ago, and a little less thoroughly today. The long and the short of it is that it's not perfect, but I don't think there's anything there (in terms of prose and MoS compliance) that would be a major concern at FAC. I can go over the entire article with a fine-toothed comb if you'd like me to, but I'd recommend biting the bullet and nominating it at FAC. If prose concerns are raised, I'll help you address them, but I'd be very surprised if there was anything not easily dealt with (you've done it before, so I'm sure you know what to expect). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear HJ Mitchell, thank you for your diligent efforts! I hope the article didn't bore you too much. :) Anyhow, I think your suggestion sounds like a good approach, with further discussion in the FAC process. After giving the article a re-examination today, I think the lead can be improved (I find this among the most difficult of aircraft articles due to the technical jargon and trivia/numbers), which I am working on now; probably during FAC some improvements to the prose/flow will occur as well.

On a procedural note, during the FAC if suggestions/requests "to do a copy-edit first" come up, I guess I should mention that it was given an examination by guild members, or point to the WP:GOCE/FA page, in lieu of {{GOCE|}} tags.

Thanks again! SynergyStar (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I found it quite interesting, and I'm sure there are many readers who enjoy it. Let me know when you nominate it at FAC, and I'll add it to my watchlist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for the advice. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hello SynergyStar! I hope you enjoy this home-made cookie of mine as a warm greeting from a fellow aviation enthusiast. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 00:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

Thank you for the tasty offering! SynergyStar (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 767

Thanks for nominating the Boeing 767 for review as an A-class article for WP:AVIATION this has been succesfull and the article has been promoted to A-class, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you MilbourneOne for performing the closing duties on the A-class review, it is much appreciated!!! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 23:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's conquer the next step before moving on to Boeing 757 and Boeing 747-400. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 09:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, do you think you can work on Airbus A330 and get it to FA? Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 09:21, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try helping out where I can, and will probably look at those and various airliner articles in the future. Keeping in mind that these things take time...the process of reaching a professional, artful article, and contributions being schedule-dependent on time available. Best, SynergyStar (talk) 23:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify invitation

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (20,839 articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 03:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

Sp33dyphil has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

--Sp33dyphil © • © 06:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you!!! Season's greetings to you as well!! And a Happy New Year! :) SynergyStar (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	In light of your extraordinary effort to promote Boeing 767 to FA status, a rather exclusive club of aircraft articles, I am pleased to award you the worthy Writer's Barnstar. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 23:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind message, and for your encouragement and help! Have a happy new year! SynergyStar (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the FA and thanks for the thanks - glad to help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the congrats!!! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boeing 707 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Domestic and Transatlantic

Lockheed L-1011 TriStar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rolls-Royce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dab links fixed SynergyStar (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus A330

Are you interested in Airbus articles at all? If yes, can you please help rewrite Airbus A330#Operators and Airbus A330#Accidents and incidents? I'm planning to give the article a thorough rewrite in a few weeks/months. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 03:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help with those sections, however will only have time probably mid-Feb. Cheers, SynergyStar (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited List of Audi vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audi R8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-Class titles1.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S-Class titles1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: Boeing 777

This is a note to let the main editors of Boeing 777 know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 12, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 12, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Boeing 777 is a long-range, wide-body, twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. It is the world's largest twinjet and is commonly referred to as the "Triple Seven". The aircraft has seating for over 300 passengers and has a range from 5,235 to 9,380 nautical miles (9,695 to 17,372 km), depending on model. Its distinguishing features include the largest-diameter turbofan engines of any aircraft, six wheels on each main landing gear, a circular fuselage cross-section, and blade-shaped tail cone. Developed in consultation with eight major airlines, the 777 was designed to replace older wide-body airliners and bridge the capacity difference between the 767 and 747. As Boeing's first fly-by-wire airliner, it has computer mediated controls; it is also the first entirely computer-designed commercial aircraft.(more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 757

The article you nominated for A-class review has been closed as passed, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been quite busy and see the article has already made it to FA - congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement, it is much appreciated!! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 16:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice job getting Boeing 757 to A-class. It's almost ready to go for the gold. Keep up the good work! Nathan2055 ^talk 18:30, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind gesture, it's much appreciated! Sincerely, SynergyStar (talk) 03:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 777 Orders and deliveries.

Thank you! I didn't know how to do that. BadaBoom (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Best wishes for the New Year!

Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013!

Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year.

Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians!

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where the heck have you been

It's been a long time since your last edit in 2012. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 00:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've been very busy with my career. It's nice to see fellow editors continuing good efforts! Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Boeing 767

This is a note to let the main editors of Boeing 767 know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Boeing 767 is a mid-size, wide-body twin-engine jet airliner built by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. It was the manufacturer's first wide-body twinjet and its first airliner with a two-crew glass cockpit. The aircraft features two turbofan engines, a conventional tail, and for reduced aerodynamic drag, a supercritical wing design. Designed as a smaller wide-body airliner than preceding aircraft such as the 747, the 767 has a capacity of 181 to 375 persons and a design range of 3,850 to 6,385 nautical miles (7,130 to 11,825 km), depending on variant. The original 767-200 entered service in 1982, followed by the 767-300 in 1986 and the 767-400ER, an extended-range variant, in 2000. Versions for freight and military use have also been created. The aircraft was initially flown on domestic and transcontinental routes, before becoming the first twin-engined airliner to receive regulatory approval for extended overseas flights. In 1986, Boeing initiated studies for a higher-capacity 767, ultimately leading to the development of the 777, a larger wide-body twinjet. In the 1990s, the 767 became the most frequently used airliner for transatlantic flights between North America and Europe. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

jets
Thank you, aviation enthusiast from planet Earth, for quality articles on jets, especially Boeing 747 to 777, and for reviewing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this kind message!!! SynergyStar (talk) 22:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 503rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again! SynergyStar (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 503 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind message! Regards SynergyStar (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now seven! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing C-17 Globemaster III in Australian service FAC

Hi, In light of your expertise on Boeing aircraft-related topics, I'd really appreciate it if you could post a review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Boeing C-17 Globemaster III in Australian service/archive1 if you have time to do so (and an interest in this specific topic, of course). Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)‎[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CNN Launch June 1, 1980.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNN Launch June 1, 1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi SynergyStar! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:United Airlines 1993 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Airlines 1993 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 18, 2015

In case you're still checking your talk page: a summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. I had to squeeze the summary down to around 1200 characters; was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time before its day on the Main Page. - Dank (push to talk) 02:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Dank! That summary is fantastic! I've been monitoring the article on a fairly regular basis and I believe its maintained its FA quality. Thank you again for your help!!! Best regards, SynergyStar (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much. Have there been any hull-loss accidents in the last three years? Updated info would be a plus. - Dank (push to talk) 16:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the information for that section. Thanks for the suggestion! Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see it flying today, precious again --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CMA CGM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CMA CGM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SynergyStar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BAW (disambiguation)

The article BAW (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not at base title linking only two articles. A hatnote to British Airways has been added to the BAW article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. f eminist 14:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SynergyStar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evergreen Corp logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evergreen Corp logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evergreen Laurel.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evergreen Laurel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evergreen Group logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evergreen Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evergreen Marine Corporation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evergreen Marine Corporation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SynergyStar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SS Normandie Grande Salle à Manger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SS Normandie Grande Salle à Manger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UNI Air logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UNI Air logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SS Normandie Le Havre maiden voyage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SS Normandie Le Havre maiden voyage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lexus Balance ad.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lexus Balance ad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wcoty.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wcoty.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oprah Lexus.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oprah Lexus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lunacats (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CNN Gulf War nightscope January 1991.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNN Gulf War nightscope January 1991.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crystal cruises.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crystal cruises.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for EVA Air

EVA Air has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Lexus LS

Lexus LS has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]