User talk:Andries Van den Abeele

With this my discussion page is opened.

Gabriel Fragnière

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gabriel Fragnière. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two references have been added Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Ungerer

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Werner Ungerer. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A reference has been added Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

Hiya, I see you added an "Introduction" heading to Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case; this is not the usual practice on Wikipedia articles. The lead area (above the table of contents) is what we use as the summary and introduction. You can read more about this idea at MOS:LEAD --Errant ^(chat!) 14:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but this lead is unusually long, which also is not in line with the usual practice. A summary should be just a couple of lines. If not separated as an 'introduction', than the rest should be information to be included in the chapters that follow. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, no the lead summary can be of any reasonable length - but the accepted format is four paragraphs - it summarises what is contained in the rest of the article. Sometimes leads contain new information not elsewhere in the article; this isn't accepted practice but usually it gets worked into the article eventually. As I mentioned; MOS:LEAD has a lot more detail on this. --Errant ^(chat!) 14:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patricia Carson

The article Patricia Carson has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 11:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Mr. Andries Van den Abeele, Foraa was so kind as to give me your name because you might be able to answer this question. I tried on you Dutch userpage but I guess you have not visited that page recently. Thank you. Lotje ツ (talk) 13:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Lotje, 'Ipgewarmde kost' of 'ipgewarmde kaffie' kan gebruikt worden in de zin van opnieuw opgerakeld nieuws dat eigenlijk al oud of afgezaagd is. Wat 'ragol(le) betreft, dit betekent 'te sterke koffie'. met hartelijke groeten, Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis de Cartier de Marchienne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sachsenhausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyens (Belgian family), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Havanna and Leopold II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Léon Suys may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcel van den Broecke

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Marcel van den Broecke, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Marcel van den Broecke to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacob Barnett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waterloo and Institute of Advanced Study (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poelaert Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palace of Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Has been corrected. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 09:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Werner Ungerer may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

) to the [[European Communities]] from 1985 to 1990, and as rector of the [[College of Europe]] in [[Brfrom 1990 to 1993.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:30, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karel De Gucht, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbia and Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Randall Lesaffer) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Randall Lesaffer, Andries Van den Abeele!

Wikipedia editor MainlyTwelve just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This page needs to be rendered in prose

To reply, leave a comment on MainlyTwelve's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randall Lesaffer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Louvain and University of Leuven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Shall be done Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ennoblement of de Schaepdrijver

As I posted on the article's talk page: As published in the Moniteur Belge of 19 July 2016:

Adellijke gunsten Op voordracht van de Vice-Eerste Minister en Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken heeft de Koning bij koninklijke besluiten van 10 juli 2016 de volgende adellijke gunsten verleend: - vergunning van de persoonlijke titel van barones aan Mevr. Sophie DE SCHAEPDRIJVER en Mevr. Isabelle SALMON; - vergunning van de persoonlijke titel van baron aan de heren Eddy BRUYNINCKX, Jacques DELEN, Dominique LAMBERT, Joseph MARTIAL, Pierre RION en Johannes (Hans) VANHOUTTE.

The fact one has to "buy" a certificate and heraldic arms, are a mere formality but the ennoblement itself dates from the date of the royal decree if the procedure is followed through. The right is only forfeited if those obligations haven't been fulfilled within 5 years of the Royal Decree. For simplicity's sake it is better - and is also up to now general practice - to make abstraction of this, and to only note if and when the rare case arises that those conditions are not met (like with Marie-France Botte )-- fdewaele 20 July 2016, 13:17.

Sorry, but you are wrong. The ennoblement will date not from 10th of july 2016, but from the date when obligations are fulfilled and accepted. When they are, the ennoblement is confirmed, and the date is the one of this confirmation. You can see this as fact by all the ennoblements of the last years. Therefore my change is correct and yours is not. Marie-France Botte is not the only example. best regards, Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lijst Grand cordon

Dag Andries, can yoou please find some more people and dates of Royal decrees to complete this list? Thank you, regards. --Carolus (talk) 10:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luc Calliou

"Orphan" means that there no links TO this artitle from other articles. "dead end" would mean that there were no links from this article to others. I hope that makes it clearer.Pam D 01:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Luc Calliauw. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwjaarswensen

	2017	Andries, moge het een goed jaar voor je worden...	Lotje (talk) 16:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Van de Werve

Merci, pour regarder ICI--Carolus (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

André de Meulemeester

Hello,

I am very appreciative of the extensive additions you have made to the above article. Could you please return to it and add citations? so that someone doesn't delete the additions as unsourced material.

Thank you.Georgejdorner (talk) 06:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC) To Georgejdorner,[reply]

I am somewhat puzzled by your request. I am not a believer in footnotes and citations on encyclopedias, because they are often obsolete after a shorter or longer time. Several have nonetheless been added by you or others to this article. I do not object against them. On the other hand I am always providing the adequate literature, like it has always been the case on encyclopedias on paper. All the informations added by me in the article (5 years ago!) are based on this literature. If somebody would take pleasure in deleting this information, I wish him well and I pity the encyclopedia. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marcel van den Broecke

Hello, Andries Van den Abeele. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcel van den Broecke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a complete loss why you revert, without any explanation, accusing me of vandalism, there where I only add a new article and make a link with its parent article. I would be more suspecting you of vandalism if you cannot give a r]easonable explanation for your behaviour. --Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 13:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to René Jacobs, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what this template indicates as a not resolved problem? I do not see any. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 21:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From the template - "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources...". There are only two relatively weak citations in the Biography section for example. Hope this explains the concern. Dl2000 (talk) 22:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I continue to object. There are not only two citations (on what basis ar you judging them as 'relatively weak'?). There are also, mentioned under 'literature', four references to more general articles concerning René Jacobs. And then the multiple recordings mentioned, easily verifiable. In general I object strongly against the idea of some users that every information must receive a particular reference. Wikipedia is not a historical study, but an encyclopedia and must be considered and worked upon as such. The Encyclopedia Brittanica is the shining example! Even the demanding German Wikipedia is, since 2005 satisfied with the presented citations and references of this living person. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 10:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Lambertus Vossius to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 12:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is by mistake that I plced the article on the English Wikipedia. I emptied the page and the empty page may be deleted. Sorry. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to request deletion for the article? if so just blank the page, and I will help you tag the page for speedy delete. Silikonz💬 16:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lambertus Vossius

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lambertus Vossius, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as nl:Lambertus Vossius, an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]