User talk:AndreyA

AndreyA is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia in April 2010

Welcome!

Hello, AndreyA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the new article announcements and the project discussion page. You might even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:52, February 13, 2009 (UTC)

Смотря с чем :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:33, February 13, 2009 (UTC)

да тут создавал {{Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division}}, неправильное имя задал. При переименовании тоже сначала переименовал подстраницу. Убей {{Infobox Saint Petersburg Railway Division}} и проверь его на подстраницы.--Andrey! 18:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Готово. Успехов в начинаниях! Если что-нибудь ещё понадобится, зови. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:50, February 13, 2009 (UTC)

Template

Я добавил параметр collapse (принимает значения yes/no). Чего сам не сделал?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 06:33, February 22, 2009 (UTC)

Lakht(y)insky crossover

Привет! Касательно Lakhtyinsky crossover, он называется "Лахтинский" или "Лахтьинский"? Если последнее, тогда нужно внести исправления по тексту; если первое — то переименовать статью в "Lakhtinsky crossover". Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:30, March 16, 2009 (UTC)

Не надо глумится.

Done--Andrey! 15:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

В смысле??? В источниках, которые приведены в статье, название не упоминалось, а как правильно я просто не знаю... Спасибо, что поправил.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:39, March 17, 2009 (UTC)

Razliv

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Razliv, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Dyuny railway station. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed+а. Во-первых, слово в скобках написано с опечаткой (надо "disambiguation"), во-вторых, для железнодорожных станций "railway station", если мне не изменяет память, уже является способом разрешения неоднозначностей (т. е. если бы "Сестрорецк" было бы уникальным названием станции, то статья бы находилась под титулом "Sestroretsk"). Поскольку же "Сестрорецк" это прежде всего город, то неоднозначностей у нас имеется три — город и две станции; соответственно страничку я перевоссоздал на Sestroretsk (disambiguation). Ссылки из шаблонов и hatnotes тоже поправил.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:23, March 30, 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо за помощь.--Andrey! 06:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ligovsky pond

A tag has been placed on Ligovsky pond requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Oleggazed! (talk) 17:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Шаблоны

Как только расплююсь со своим списком наблюдения (запустил за время праздников), так сразу же пройдусь по этим шаблонам. В шаблоне с реками и каналами, кстати, крестики что обозначают?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:16, July 6, 2009 (UTC)

По поводу пройтись - буду благодарен, когда бы ты это не сделал. Список запустил в translit.ru и вот результат.--Andrey! 12:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Крестики обозначают, что объект уже не существует.--Andrey! 12:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Крестики надо, наверное, пояснить прямо в шаблоне, а то совсем непонятно. Я первым делом про кладбища подумал :) Что касается translit.ru, то для наших целей он не подходит. Наши правила все расписываются в WP:RUS — если не трудно, проверяй, пожалуйста, в будущем против них. Если же трудно (или долго, что с непривычки запросто), то я и сам пройдусь; главное всё-таки контент :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:29, July 6, 2009 (UTC)

Что касается транслитерации, то я по обоим шаблонам прошёлся. Также поправил кое-где ссылки, где надо было заменить строчные буквы на заглавные (river→River; pond→Pond, и т.п.), но поскольку в этой области я со всеми правилами не знаком, то заменил только те, в которых был уверен.

Также один вопрос — во втором шаблоне присутствуют две станции метро: Ligovo subway station и Ligovsky Prospekt (Saint Petersburg Metro). Вторую я знаю, а вот что имелось в виду под первой, не очень уверен. В статьях о питерском метро такая станция не упоминается. Можно прояснить? Спасибо!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:03, July 6, 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо.--Andrey! 11:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Про метро - это непростая история. Когда строили первую линию питерского метро, то планировалось его построить от Лигово до Ручьёв. Но пока строили реальность повлияла на планы. на память остались хитрое путевое развитие на Ветеранов в сторону Лигово и два тоннеля между Политехнической и Академической. Вряд ли когда-либо будет достаточно основанной на авторитетных источниках информации, чтобы написать статью. Только если планы строительства опубликуют.--Andrey! 11:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за объяснение!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:47, July 7, 2009 (UTC) 13:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Лапки

Вообще, он всё-таки прав. Названия страниц разрешения неоднозначностей могут содержать диакритику, если все вхождения на этой страницы также содержат диакритику. В данном же случае у нас имеются польская Łapka и российская Lapka, из чего следует, что дизамбиг должен быть под "Lapka". Ведь если польскую Лапку в английском тексте запросто можно увидеть под "Lapka", то обратное утверждение (для питерской реки) будет неверным. Другими словами, "Lapka can refer to Łapka, a village in Poland", но "Łapka cannot refer to the Lapka River in Russia".

Не следует также забывать, что дизамбиги из двух предметов в целом бесполезны — гораздо проще в польской статье сверху добавить "For the river in Russia...", а в русской (когда она появится) — "For the village in Poland...".

Для целей поиска это всё большого значения действительно не имеет, но с точки зрения правил оформления — это важно.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:28, July 21, 2009 (UTC)

Я не против - просто он текст перенёс вместо переименования. Попроси его переименовать через move чтобы он понял как это делается.--Andrey! 18:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Да он знает, он просто маяться не хотел :) В любом случае, я всё перенёс куда надо. Если где-то что-то пропустил, дай знать, поправлю.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:35, July 21, 2009 (UTC)

Novo-Admiralteisky Bridge

Discussion is transferred on Talk:Novo-Admiralteisky Bridge#Place

Templates

Нету. Есть практически никем не используемый {{Moved to}}. В принципе, можно по аналогии создать и {{Moved from}}.
Насколько мне известно, шаблона с такими же возможностями у нас нет. Опять-таки, если надумаешь портировать ru:Шаблон:Oq, вряд ли кто будет против.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:53, July 27, 2009 (UTC)

Leningrad Naval Base

I wanted to thank you for adding this article, which I have just capitalised at the end in line with normal English usage in regard to proper names. Would you be able to add a list of ships which have the base as their homeport? Thanks again, and if you need any help, please let me know. Kind regards Buckshot06(prof) 22:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that have corrected the text. I will try to write without errors.--Andrey! 19:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Part of discussion is copyed on Talk:Leningrad Naval Base#Ships

No problems. That's why we're multi-lingual here; other editors can fix any errors that you might make. Thanks also for adding the current commander's article. Buckshot06(prof) 12:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mariinsky Stage Two article

Thanks for your comments. I've enjoyed expanding upon the article and have learned a lot about the new opera house. I was in St. Petersburg in 2005 and went to the Mariinsky, of course, but this is the first time that I've learned so much about the new house. When it is finished, it will be a good reason to return!

One question: was the old theatre restored from 2006? We say it was going to happen, but I wonder if it was ever completed. Viva-Verdi (talk) 15:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repair goes without a stop of representations, basically - to summer holidays. The auditorium is essentially updated, the ceiling and a part of boxes is made. Works should be finished in 2010. (News of the end 2008).--Andrey! 15:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPb template

Извиняюсь за задержку с ответом — совершенно не заметил это сообщение.

По шаблону у меня особого мнения нет — если будут все в одном, то пусть будут; будут отдельно для ж/д, автобусов и т.д., тоже нормально. Единственное, что мне не нравится, так это то, что они все записаны как "вокзалы". Если шаблон разбить, то эта проблема будет решена.

Кстати, для ж/д вокзалов шаблон у нас уже есть: {{Rail terminals in St. Petersburg}}.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:46, August 11, 2009 (UTC)

Башня св. Олафа

Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template#Template:SPb Metro\Line 5

Я вижу там уже ответили. Помогло? Или нужна дополнительная помощь?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:51, August 14, 2009 (UTC)

Как раз поэтому я к тебе и обратился.Ты специалист по шаблонам и администратор. Разблокировать… Модифицировать… Оцени предложение на разумность и помоги осуществить,если это возможно.--Andrey! 17:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tower of St. Olav

Добавил.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:15, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо.--Andrey! 16:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. Статья наполовину дублирует Vyborg Castle - что именно надо сказать о башне помимо того, что относится к замку в целом? нужны ли оба текста одновременно? Я бы взялся довести её (их?) до кондиций, но нужно время прочесть источники. NVO (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Дело в том, что башня достойна статьи хотя бы потому, что является символом и основной высотной доминантой города. Писал отдельную статью по нескольким причинам: башня - фактически единственный объект, дошедший до нас с того самого года, к тому же именно башня четырежды перестраивалась; с башни начались пожары в замке, после чего она изменила свой облик; в ней практически не жили, используя её в милитаристических целях; в конце концов это главный туристический объект города.--Andrey! 17:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Russian submarine Kazan

Template:Russian submarine Kazan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT

Just a reminder that the DEFAULTSORT keyword uses a colon (:), not a pipe (|). For instance: {{DEFAULTSORT:Towers in Russia}}, not {{DEFAULTSORT|Towers in Russia}}. —Paul A (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Andrey! 02:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ruin Tower

Hello Andrey! I rearranged the first paragraph of your Ruin Tower article with improved English. I hope you do not mind that I did this. I enjoy reading your articles, and I appreciate all of the hard work you are putting into them. If you are okay with me copy-editing them, then I will continue to do so. Best Regards! -- Biglovinb (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ondine

There is currently a discussion taking place about the music and the ballet of Ondine. There are two existing articles about the one ballet.

- Ondine (Ashton), which is about the actual ballet choreographed by Frederick Ashton for the Royal Ballet
- Undine (ballet), which is about the same ballet, but primarily focussing on the music and treating the choreography as a secondary topic

Members of the Classical Music Wikiproject want to merge the article about the ballet into the article about the music, but I do not think this should happen, as the music was written specially for this ballet. Please could you visit the discussion page, and vote in favour of keeping the two articles separate, so that the article about the actual ballet is preserved, as it was by one of Britain's most famous choreographers and was one of his most popular ballets. Your help with this would be much appreciated.

See here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Classical_music#Straw_Poll

Please vote Oppose to the Straw Poll and Support to the 2nd Straw Poll.

Many thanks, and I hope to work with you on some ballet related articles in the near future.

Crazy-dancing (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biryulka

Починил. Проблема в основном в том, что параметры от старой версии этого инфобокса хоть в целом и поддерживаются, но разобраться, как они пересекаются с новой версией довольно непросто (а документировать их я не стал, ибо нефиг их плодить). В будущем рекомендую сразу воспользоваться новым набором параметров. А за статью спасибо! Добавил себе в список редактирования, через год-другой доберусь :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:12, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Your English is fairly good, but there are some things I do not understand.

'names of founders have remained': is this 'Surviving documents give the names of the founders'
'protege Yakut province Onichkov: A protege is a younger person helped by an older person. My dictionary gives Stavlenik=protege or henchman, but here it must be some kind of government official (??).
Arpent: How big was a Russian Arpent? An arpent in the formerly French parts of North America is about an acre, which looks small.
What is a Spillikin?
Mandative is not English. Is 'Prekaznoy Pavel Kh.' (footnote 6) 'lead by Pavel Kh.'?
in veins is not English.
what is a fire pier? A pier for fire-fighting boats?
ice bridge: GoogleEarth shows a pontoon bridge at Biryulka. Is this used in summer? GoogleEarth seems to show that Biryulka is in flat farming country surrounded by mountains. If this is true, it should probably be part of the article.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 04:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Trovato: names of founders have remained': is this 'Surviving documents give the names of the founders--Andrey! 20:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the book:

Gorbunov, K. (1978-07-17). "Праздник села" (in Russian). Ленская правда. p. 2. Retrieved 2009-11-09.

it is written that the village was found by settlers Stepan Aleksandrovich and Michael Kostjakov.--Andrey! 20:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your template question

Мда, не маленький шаблон получился... Насчёт категории посмотрю, но только уже не сегодня.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 22:43, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

Обдумав вопрос, я способа присваивания категории по параметру разворачивания не вижу (даже теоретически). Но могу ошибаться.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:12, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

Жаль. Я думал собрать шаблоны вокзалов в один и присваивать категорию к статье в зависимости от развёрнутого блока. Ну ладно, оставим так.--Andrey! 20:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Беру слова назад. Всё можно. Баги не тестировал, но вроде бы работает→User:Ezhiki/Template и User:Ezhiki/Template/test (пример использования). Добавил только Азербайджан и Беларусь; остальные можно добавить также по аналогии.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:28, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

Lena

Мне кажется, что лучше всего будет табличку вообще убрать. Это же всё-таки шаблон навигации, а не обзорная статья в таблицах и списках. В крайнем случае разобрать табличку на две строчки —boat types и places. Даты же и прочее будут в собственно статьях.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:30, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Shitik 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shitik 2007.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indigerka - Tanker template

Discussion is transferred to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Indigirka River

Template & district centers

Технически это выполнимо, но я не уверен, что на практике это хорошая идея. В некоторых субъектах десятки районов; у них вся карта будет усыпана зелёными точками и разглядеть на ней единственную красную будет не так-то просто. К тому же шаблон существенно раздуется (поскольку для каждого субъекта надо будет обрабатывать набор из как минимум десятка координат), да и для крупных городов (республиканского/краевого/областного/окружного значения) смысла указывать районные центры на карте нет. Но я ещё подумаю; мысль интересная.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:09, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Culvert category

Discussion is transferred to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Waterways#Culverts

Miller's line

Hallo AndreyA, Please do a bit of work on this article which you created. It doesn't make sense as it stands. The first sentence should be something like "... is a railway line in thistown, thatcountry, opened in thatyear". The rest of the article needs more work too. Thanks. PamD (talk) 14:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A quick note. I'd recommmend compiling the whole nest of articles related to Sestroretsk Rail into one text (as it was done in the sole referenced web page). Miller's line can be easily trimmed down to less than half of its current word count (if only to step aside from word-by-word translation of the source). But it was, after all, an insignificant siding and a business flop that ran for thirteen years only - and should be better off as part of a larger article. Andrey, I already mentioned this regarding Vyborg tower: splitting content into overlapping small pieces doesn't work. Keep it together, maybe then other users will help (unfortunately I'm too busy in RL for the next few weeks, and, as you may have guessed, I don't feel that the article should stay at all). NVO (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:High-speed trains in Russia

Hello. Thanks for adding Template:High speed trains in Russia, however templates should not replace categories, as categories make the articles visible from other places eg: Category:Rail transport in Russia >> Category:High-speed rail in Russia >> Category:High-speed trains in Russia

I've put the categories back in.Shortfatlad (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dire Straits

Категория была удалена в 2007 году с кучей других похожих категорий "due to overcategorization". Сейчас, конечно, понять сколько статей/подкатегорий было в этой конкретной категории на момент её удаления невозможно, но судя по CfD их было мало, в то время как на настоящий момент мне кажется их вполне достаточно, чтобы категорию просто перевоссоздать без излишнего бюрократизма. Если у кого-нибудь с этим будут проблемы, обращайся, помогу.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:43, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I think Exhiki mentioned the Category:Dire Straits was deleted as part of an over categorisation program a couple of years ago. That didn't mean it couldn't be recreated, which I have done. You will need to add the images from the albums (I have done the songs), a short preamble about who Dire Straits were, and any other article which is relevant, but not included in one of the sub-categories. Much better than a navbox of categories don't you think? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's pretty much what I said to Andrey above (in case you can't understand those Russian scribbles :)). Thanks and cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:39, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dire Straits tineline

Template:Dire Straits tineline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Theotokos of St. Theodore

Template:Theotokos of St. Theodore has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Svick (talk) 02:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Dire Straits tours

Proposed deletion of Tiffany's, dancehall

The article Tiffany's, dancehall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable venue.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frank | talk 09:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tiffany's, dancehall

I have nominated Tiffany's, dancehall, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany's, dancehall. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 01:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arena Club Logo.svg

Hi, an SVG version of the logo is now available for this article Arena club MaenK.A._Talk 09:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. You have made that I cannot make.--Andrey! 09:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template question

Я сильно не всматривался, но параметр coordinates явно можно вообще не использовать. Он автоматически заполнится из значений latitude/longitude. А фигня всякая вылазит потому, что между минусом и троечкой в строке longitude затесался пробел. И, кстати, если вместо latitude/longitude использовать latd/latm/lats/latNS и longd/longm/longs/lonEW, то тогда координаты можно показывать и в градусах/минутах/секундах, а не в десятых градуса. Я в Workingman's Institute and Memorial Hall так и сделал для демонстрации.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 22, 2010; 16:05 (UTC)

Да не за что.

Документацию я править не буду; там по ходу глюков и недоговорённостей больше, чем только недокументированные координаты. Пусть те, кто этим шаблоном пользуются, им и занимаются.

Что же касается вывода координат, то, как оказалось, в шаблон также встроен параметр "coordinates_display", который можно установить в "yes" и координаты в шапке появятся. В чём сакральный смысл не показывать координаты по умолчанию, а заставлять пользователей выводить их с помощью отдельного параметра мне неизвестно, но по крайней мере работает :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 22, 2010; 19:31 (UTC)

Timeline

User:AndreyA/Dire Straits timeline as per your request. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 07:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Discussion is transferred to Talk:Dire Straits tour#Images

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tiffany's dance hall overview.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tiffany's dance hall overview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated File:Tiffany's november 1980.jpg for deletion as well. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This tag goes on the images themselves. It includes an explanation of the problem. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I consider that use of not free image in article is justified and I do not see discussion on removal of this file--Andrey! 16:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frank, it is not necessary to answer here

Frank said:--Andrey! 16:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the image is copyrighted, you must provide sufficient reason to keep it. It isn't necessary to show why it should be deleted, because it is WP:COPYRIGHTED and therefore generally cannot be used. Frank | talk 16:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) The discussion is on the image itself. It is in the first box currently displayed on each image page, starting with the words "This image or media has a non-free use rationale that is disputed because of the following concern...." These images will be reviewed by another administrator after a week to see if deletion is appropriate. If you think that these images are usable under non-free content guidelines, you should explain why at the image's talk page. The administrator who reviews the matter will consider your remarks. If you do not respond, the images will almost certainly be deleted on March 9th. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dire Straits tour

Andrey, I have removed all of the notes from the Dire Straits article. More than half of that (very poorly written) article was about anything other than the Dire Straits tour. Here's the deal: on wikipedia, each article is about the subject of the article. If you want to write about something like Tiffeny's, you should do it in an article about Tiffany's, and not in an article about Dire Straits. I hope that's reasonably clear. I have placed the article on my watchlist and will revert any attempt to re-add off-topic information.

Note there was such an article at Tiffany's, dancehall which I nominated for deletion; it was subsequently deleted. Frank | talk 22:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dire Straits tour/Notes

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you were trying to make a subpage of a content page. That is not possible in Wikipedia. I suggest you make the page as a subpage of your Userpage, and then later move it, as a new page, to the mainspace. According to me, your article as it is, is validly nominated for speedy deletion. Shashwat986 (talk) 06:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey, you are wrong to try to add the notes to the Dire Straits article. I have already told you that the Dire Straits Tour article should be about the Dire Straits Tour only. There is no place for the Notes in the article, or under the article, or anywhere near the article. If you want to add them then do a proper article on Tiffany's, one that does not get deleted as the last one did. To be honest, I am puzzled that you work on the English wikipedia rather than one in your first language. Your english is not good (clearly, much better than my Russian, but still not good. Not good enough to write articles on the English wikipedia, in my view. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Write this article. I am ready to help with selection of sources and the facts. Find someone another and I will help his.--Andrey! 15:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndreyA. You have new messages at Shashwat986's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Lafayette club

I have nominated Lafayette club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lafayette club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 18:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of JB's Dudley

I have nominated JB's Dudley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JB's Dudley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 22:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Fforde Green Hotel

I have nominated Fforde Green Hotel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fforde Green Hotel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 22:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Arena club

I have nominated Arena club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arena club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 22:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 76 Club

I have nominated 76 Club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/76 Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 22:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arena Club Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arena Club Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Удалист, как вижу, всего один, и претензия у него тоже одна — lack of notability. Про venues эти я сам ничего не знаю, но из информации в этих статьях notability действительно определить трудно. Советую в AfDs привести список источников, из которых будет понятно, почему тот или иной venue действительно notable. Если такие источники уже есть в References, можно отдельно показать пальцем :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 15, 2010; 14:18 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Alban Arena

I have nominated Alban Arena, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alban Arena. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 12:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rock Garden Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rock Garden Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sex Pistols Wolverhampton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sex Pistols Wolverhampton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Мраморный дворец

Не очень вижу смысл это проверять, но "мой" гугл на первой странице из десяти ссылок девять показывает на страницы про Мраморный дворец в Петербурге (включая русскую википедию во второй позиции), и одну на санаторий в курорте Моршин (восьмой позицией). Во второй десятке результаты немного более разнообразны.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 5, 2010; 13:59 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Bruno Granholm

Category:Bruno Granholm, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division

A template you created, Template:Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Пишите о железных дорогах?

Не желаете написать несколько статей о железных дорогах России? Я бы с удовольствием дал материал. Zimin.V.G. (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Сейчас на работе сильно занят. После праздников отвечу.--Andrey! 11:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Primorskaya raiway

Привет. Обрати внимание на ru:Приморская-Сестрорецкая железная дорога - пора сделать хотя бы заготовку для Primorskaya raiway, чтоб были интервики. --Kaganer (talk) 00:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Это копипаста. Переписывать лень, поэтому молчу.--Andrey! 08:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division/doc

Template:Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division/doc, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:Infobox Station Saint Petersburg Railway Division/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Russian Railways stations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re 2 Rossi Street

Is this original work or a translation of an article from the Russian Wikipedia?

If it is a translation from the Russian Wikipedia, what is the name of the original source article? If it is a translation, when you translate articles you should:

Make the edit summary for the first edit be something like "Create article via translation from Russian Wikipedia: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Красный Октябрь"
Add this template to the article's talk page soon after you create the article: {{Translated page|ru|Красный Октябрь}}
Add this at the bottom of the page: [[ru:Красный Октябрь]] to create a link to the Russian article in the sidebar.

(Obviously, substituting the correct article name for Red October in all cases.)

The first two steps are actually required by our licensing, they have the effect of incorporating the contributions to the original Russian article into the English article, for legal purposes. Thanks and cheers, Herostratus (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Invitation to discussion

Template:Invitation to discussion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lagrange613 (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Civil-engineering designs of objects of culture in Russia in 1990-2011

Template:Civil-engineering designs of objects of culture in Russia in 1990-2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jenks24 (talk) 04:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Birmingham at Barbarella

A tag has been placed on Birmingham at Barbarella, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Illegal bootleg album. Not notable.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Secondarywaltz (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sergei Yesenin

Template:Sergei Yesenin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Birmingham at Barbarella

The article Birmingham at Barbarella has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable bootleg album. Notability of recordings

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Birmingham at Barbarella cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Birmingham at Barbarella cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Baltic Pipeline System-II

Template:Baltic Pipeline System-II has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob^Talk 21:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eddie Fewtrell clubs

Template:Eddie Fewtrell clubs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ajf773 (talk) 07:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Culverts has been nominated for discussion

Category:Culverts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roman Mashkov handbill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Mashkov handbill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vyborg Castle has been nominated for discussion

Category:Vyborg Castle, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roman Mashkov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Mashkov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Mashkov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slp1 (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Objects near railway station Novaya Derevnya

Template:Objects near railway station Novaya Derevnya has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gorskaya road interchange

The article Gorskaya road interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable highway interchange

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mackensen (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Saint Petersburg Ring Road

Template:Saint Petersburg Ring Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Primorskaya Railway lines

Template:Primorskaya Railway lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liteyny bridge, Sestroretsk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liteyny bridge, Sestroretsk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liteyny bridge, Sestroretsk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Saint Petersburg Railway Division lines

Template:Saint Petersburg Railway Division lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Saint Petersburg Railway Division stations

Template:Saint Petersburg Railway Division stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Saint Petersburg Railway Division left/Direct to Beloostrov through Sestroretsk in 1926-1931

Template:S-line/Saint Petersburg Railway Division left/Direct to Beloostrov through Sestroretsk in 1926-1931 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Saint Petersburg Railway Division right/Direct to Beloostrov through Sestroretsk in 1926-1931

Template:S-line/Saint Petersburg Railway Division right/Direct to Beloostrov through Sestroretsk in 1926-1931 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russia rail succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Russia rail succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saint Petersburg Railway Division templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Saint Petersburg Railway Division templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]