User talk:Ana Stelline
General note: If I have previously removed your comment, it means that you are not welcome to post on my talk page again, and that I am likely to report you to the trust and safety team if you continue bothering me.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Ana Stelline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Some references would be nice
[edit]Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! Your edits to the BND article are very helpful, but we need some sources for your added information. Please have a look at this page: WP:RS - Thank you very much. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ana Stelline. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ana Stelline. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Hallstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Frankfurt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ursula von der Leyen
[edit]On 16 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ursula von der Leyen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
Ad Orientem (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Possible Ladson family member
[edit]Hello, thank you for your recent contributions about the Ladson family! I came across Edward Ladson Fishburne and thought he might be linked to the Ladson family, especially since he is from South Carolina. Thsmi002 (talk) 23:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any Ladson ancestors of his on various genealogy sites, so it's a possibility that he was simply named for a friend of the family or godfather or something like that, a fairly common practice in those days. --Ana Stelline (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds like that is the case. Thanks again for your contributions! Thsmi002 (talk) 11:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Ursula von der leyen casting vote.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free image being used in a decorative manner in Ursula von der Leyen#Family and early life. The contextual justification for non-free use which is required by WP:NFCC#8 is not really provided since there's no sourced critical commentary discussing the image anywhere in the article and no siginificant increase in understanding is gained from the reader seeing this particular image particularly since there's no mention of this particular election in the relevant section. Per WP:NFCC#1 and WP:FREER, the reader doesn't need to see an image of von der Leyen voting to understand that she voted in any election yet alone this particular one or that she and her family voted cast their votes together. The claim that this is a "Non-free historic image" is also suspect per WP:ITSHISTORIC. Images of historic events like a particular election are not necessarily historic in their own rights; they need reliable sources describing them as such. If such critical commentary about image exists, it should be added to the article to establish the context for non-free use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Nomination of Kerstin Emhoff for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerstin Emhoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerstin Emhoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)