User talk:Amitheonlyonethatsawake?

Welcome!

Hello, Amitheonlyonethatsawake?, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tarsus club, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —teb728 t c 06:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarsus club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tarsus club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —teb728 t c 06:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Conspiracy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Conspiracy was changed by Amitheonlyonethatsawake? (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974382 on 2014-07-19T06:40:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarsus club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tarsus club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 06:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your message

Re your message: You have obviously found my talk page, so please feel free to ask whatever questions you would like regarding Wikipedia. However, if your questions are about the article you created. It was deleted because it was inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a web host to post your personal opinions on world issues. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I was composing my message to you when you left your second message. There are no PMs on Wikipedia. All communication is in the open. That is one of the fundamental features of Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Age means very little on Wikipedia since nobody can tell whom is whom on Wikipedia. We have a editors across the entire age spectrum. However, it does not matter if it was written by a 14 year old or a 74 year old. It was still inappropriate for the reasons that I stated to you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I already told you why the article was inappropriate. If you choose not to read the links that I provided, then there is nothing further I can do. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Wikipedia is not a web host and not here to post your person opinions. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Your "factual" article is easily disproven by looking at the following Wikipedia articles: Members of the Council on Foreign Relations and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs. Murray Chance is listed in neither. And I'm pretty confident that if I start looking up the Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, etc. that I will not find him there either. I strongly recommend that you stop this nonsense right now. I told you that Wikipedia is not for posting your personal opinions and is it not for things you made up one day either. If you continue such disruptive editing, you will likely find yourself blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Murray chance, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Murray chance. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Gogo Dodo. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 07:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 10:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]