User talk:Amirreza360

Ways to improve Sina Tehrani

Hi, I'm Fiachra10003. Amirreza360, thanks for creating Sina Tehrani!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this well-written article. However, it's unlikely that the subject of the article would be notable by the standards of the Wikipedia community. You may want to take a look at WP:GNG.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Fiachra10003 (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reza Bahram

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reza Bahram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Bahram. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Amirreza360. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Reza Bahram, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amirreza360. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amirreza360|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please explain how you came by the text you added to Reza Bahram in your first substantive edit to that page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet of the blocked user User:حمید میرزایی, following a SPI case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/حمید میرزایی. If you are not the same person as User:حمید میرزایی, you can request an unblock here. You will need to address the issues brought up in the investigation. If you are the same person who was controlling the account User:حمید میرزایی, then you can request an unblock here addressing why you violated the sockpuppetry policy previously. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sina Tehrani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sina Tehrani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sina Tehrani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ploni (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iranian management consultants

A tag has been placed on Category:Iranian management consultants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]