User talk:American Imperialist

Welcome!

Hello, American Imperialist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Michaelbusch (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Taymyr

A tag has been placed on Flag of Taymyr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still working on this article? jj137 ♠ Talk 01:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am still creating this article. Sorry about the misunderstanding. American Imperialist 01:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I have done the same thing countless times. jj137 ♠ Talk 01:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Kamchatka Krai

Hi there, comrade Imperialist! :) I must admit that I did not much like the source you cited for the fact that Kamchatka Krai currently is using the flag of Kamchatka Oblast, so I did some research of my own. No offense, I hope.

Anyway, one thing that is 100% certain is that when a federal subject of Russia adopts a symbol (a flag, a coat of arms, or an anthem), there is always a legislative act describing it. If a symbol being adopted replaces the old symbol, the old legislative act expires as well. The whole procedure is always documented.

As of today, there have not been a law prescribing to use Kamchatka Oblast's old flag as the flag of Kamchatka Krai. What's more, both old flag laws (Kamchatka Oblast's and Koryakia's) are still in effect. What this means is that Kamchatka Krai as a whole does not officially have a flag (or a coat of arms), but the old flags can still be used on the territories of federal subjects that existed before the merger. Which is to say that if one sees a flag of Kamchatka Oblast somewhere in Koryakia, one can bet it is not flown officially.

I'll keep that particular area of Kamchatka Krai's law in sight and will let you know when a new flag is adopted (or when the old flag is officially adopted as the flag of the whole krai). Meanwhile, I would suggest moving the Flag of Kamchatka article to Flag of Kamchatka Oblast and tweaking the text accordingly. If the krai eventually adopts a new flag, we'll create an article at Flag of Kamchatka Krai; if the old flag is adopted for the krai, we'll move Flag of Kamchatka Oblast to Flag of Kamchatka Krai and make necessary modifications to the text.

Please let me know if you need anything clarified, and thanks for bothering to create the article in the first place :) Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt I am going to be of much help as far as creating content about the flags goes (although I can certainly help you out with determining their status, which is especially important for the post-merger federal subjects). I do, however, want to make an observation about the way the articles you have created are titled—you seem to be using short names of the federal subjects, but you are not always doing it correctly. For example, "Flag of Koryak" should in fact be "Flag of Koryakia" (if you use the short name) or, better yet, "Flag of Koryak Autonomous Okrug" (full name, which pairs nicely with the title of the main article—Koryak Autonomous Okrug). Same goes for "Flag of Kamchatka"—Kamchatka is first and foremost a geographical entity (a peninsula), which does not have its own flag. "Flag of Kamchatka Krai" would be the correct name for the article about the flag of Kamchatka Krai, and "Flag of Kamchatka Oblast"—for the article about Kamchatka Oblast. You can find the full names (and short names, if any) in the articles about those federal subjects, and the list of the federal subjects is, of course, available through federal subjects of Russia. It may not be that big of a deal while you are writing articles about the republics, but you'll have to agree that there is huge difference between, say, "Flag of Belgorod" and "Flag of Belgorod Oblast"!

Anyway, if you need help with moving the articles, don't hesitate to let me know—I'd be happy to help. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure that this is done. It may take some time, however, but I will make it my number one priority. Thanks for your help fellow comrade! American Imperialist (talk) 19:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like you

Your userboxes show that you think basically the same way that I do when it comes to politics.Alex1996Ne (talk) 02:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it, we do think in a few similar ways in politics. Your picture gallery on your user page is pretty interesting by the way. American Imperialist (talk) 15:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thank you for that compliment. You should come see the gallery when I'm done. Alex1996Ne (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice flag gallery

Nice flag gallery I had no idea that there are that many countries who don't have recognition.Alex1996Ne (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed moves

"Autonomous okrugs" are entities which, despite being in administrative jurisdiction of a krai or an oblast, are nevertheless constituent members of the Russian Federation (i.e., they send their representatives to the Federation Council). They are included with the rest of the federal subjects and have equal rights on the federal level.

Since 2005, some of the autonomous okrugs were merged with other federal subjects, and lost their federal subject status. Some of those autonomous okrugs were given special administrative status, and their names now omit the word "autonomous" (e.g., "Komi-Permyak Autonomous Okrug" became "Komi-Permyak Okrug" of Perm Krai). As far as the flags and coats of arms are concerned, the okrugs retain them without changes, so, technically, either title ("Flag of Komi-Permyak Autonomous Okrug" or "Flag of Komi-Permyak Okrug") is correct, although, of course, the latter is more up-to-date. If you do the moves, that would be OK, but if you leave the article as-is, that would not be much of a problem either (after all, the articles would still discuss the flags of these entities, even though the entities themselves ceased to exist in that form).

Hope this helps.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New User box

I think you might like this Userbox. User:Jw21/deUBdomain/"supports" bush invasion Tell me what you think of it.Alex1996Ne (talk) 00:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you. I found it on the newest userboxes page. Funny stuff can come out of there.Alex1996Ne (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New sub page

I created a new sub page called User:Alex1996Ne/Clintons. Check it out if you want because I Know you will like it.Alex1996Ne (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You found my subpage!

Nice, you found my subpage. You are the first person to find the current one. Good Job!--Smashbrosboy (talk) 02:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you did not use the prefix index on my user page...--Smashbrosboy (talk) 02:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you really are an American Imperialist....

Hi!
If u're really an American Imperialist why don't you use this flag that i made especially for the (albeit fictional) Imperial States of America and the userbox that i made just for it:

This User Believes that the USA is indeed a Global Empire.

posted here for your consideration. --Oren neu dag (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They should remain in user space only. :) --Otterathome (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Origins of my imperial flag

Well if u've heared about Noam Chomsky or the New American Century, or just basically read the article about the possibility that such an empire might exist, u'd see that in all forms of address to the issue they all talk about some mega-country that runs the world (some call it "in an oppresive way", and others call in "a benevolent way"), much like how the roman empire managed the known world at it's time. Well this gave me the idea if such empire where to exist it will need a new flag (since the old one isn't very compatible with the idea of an empire) and it made me start thinking what that flag would be, and after much thought (and many drafts) i came finally to the one u know already and publicized it on wikipedia (and other places in the internet as well) and that's about it.
P.S. I'm also trying to create a Coat of Arms for the empire, but this is far from being finished and i'm still working on it, but if u'd like i'll be happy to mail u the draft that i'm currently working on. --Oren neu dag (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BTW - Image:Imperial States of America.svg is under {{Attribution}}, not fair-use. --Oren neu dag (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like quite a project. For the sake of curiosity, do you plan to place this image on an article related to the topic, or is it just meant for the userbox template? American Imperialist (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually thats a stupid question. You previously said that it was fictional. Regard me as image-retarded on wikipedia. American Imperialist (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UserBox

HA HA!!! That is so funny! I changed it, thanks. Oh I will be changing my username within a week. Blessings, AmericaNeedsJesus 19:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello there, just a flying visit really. I note your a Christian but support the death penalty...I was wondering how you reconcile these two things? This is not intended as an attack or any such thing but general interest. Gavin Scott (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting point, but did Christ not say "You have heard that it was said "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also." Also, when the woman was to be stoned did he not say "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone."? Clearly Christ was against the Death Penalty- don't you think? Gavin Scott (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, many interpret it that way. Yet it merely brings the Mosaic law into conflict with the New Testament. Keep in mind that the woman's accusers were trying to lure Christ into a trap to see whether or not he upheld the Mosaic law over Roman law, both of which came into conflict with each other in regards to the course of punishment. However, He outsmarted them by deciding to merely avoid such an arguement.

I do not mean to blatantly drop the conversation, but discussion pages should be used to collaborate on issues regarding wikipedia itself, rather than the views of the users. It is inevitable for users to have different views, especially considering the kind of patriot of the U.S. that I am. Nevertheless, it was nice to talk to you anyway, especially now that we know more about each other. American Imperialist (talk) 01:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kamchatka Krai

No, the new image is simply a slightly modified version of the old one (hopefully more accurate, although I am no expert on vexillology), but it is definitely not the new flag. The new flag is not available yet, and, as a matter of fact, the Government of Kamchatka Krai announced a CoA/Flag/Anthem contest only a couple weeks ago (on August 8). Contest entries are accepted from August 25 through December 15, and the preliminary selection process will take place from November 29 to December 14. The final selections will be made between December 22 and January 22, and the winner will be announced on January 23, 2009. Until then, any folks attempting to upload a "new" flag should be shot on sight :) In Хинт's defense, the name of the new image is not completely misleading, as Kamchatka Krai continues to officially use the flags of both Kamchatka Oblast and Koryak Autonomous Okrug until the new flag is adopted. Same goes for the coats of arms. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KBR

Hi there! Would you be interested in fixing this horrible stub? Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:30, February 3, 2009 (UTC)

You

Glad to hear you are not dead. Those flag articles aren't writing themselves, you know :) Hope to see you around soon. Happy holidays!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 10, 2010; 20:30 (UTC)

Request for comment

Could you comment on my proposal related to nudity in images in the idea lab? Ryan Vesey (talk) 01:30, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Museum backstage pass

The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. ---LoriLee (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US flag colors

As a participant in the most recent debate I can find on this subject, I thought you might be interested in this discussion here. Thanks. CRRays Head90 | ^{Get Some!} 20:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry and Vexillology project

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, American Imperialist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]