User talk:Amcdougal

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Amcdougal! Thank you for your contributions. I am George8211 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —George8211 / T 17:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amcdougal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amcdougal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Boyd (Oklahoma Legislator) has been accepted

Betty Boyd (Oklahoma Legislator), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 23:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Anna Hibler (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Anna Hibler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^speak up! 05:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donna Nigh (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donna Nigh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edmon Low (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edmon Low and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 17:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cindy Ross (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cindy Ross and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason not to publish this; sources include a news wire service, university press releases, award organization websites, and a newspaper. I consider WP:RELIABLE and WP:N to both be met at this point, so I've gone ahead and moved this draft into the article namespace. After all, it's far better cited than the majority of stubs and starts on Wikipedia. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 00:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Penny Williams

added a link pointing to Metropolitan

Shan Goshorn

added a link pointing to Department of Interior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Party

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia on state politicians. Please do not link to this disambiguation page. If you think a link is appropriate for a subject, please take care to link to the correct page. In this case, I think you want to link either to Democratic Party (United States) or to a state Democratic Party article. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 22:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links and categories

Hey Amcdougal! You have been doing great work! However, some of the articles don't get very much visibility because they aren't connected with the other content on Wikipedia. One of the best ways to do this is through watching File:Category_explanation.ogv and following the guidelines at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing_pages. Similarly its important to add links to the article so its connected to articles that mention the topic. I highly recommend using Find Link which can return results like this, that help you find places to link articles that already mention the topic. For more information about linking, read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#General_principles. Keep up the great work! Sadads (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Della Warrior

I have nominated your article on Della Warrior for a DYK. Thank you for adding to the history of our Oklahoma heritage. You can follow the progress here: Template:Did you know nominations/Della Warrior SusunW (talk) 04:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! The nomination passed. Really quick review. My first one took much longer. You will get a notice when your article will appear on the front page of Wikipedia. SusunW (talk) 21:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Della Warrior

added links pointing to President George Bush and Head Start

Valree Fletcher Wynn

added a link pointing to Douglass High School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sally Kern edits

Some of your edits on Sally Kern removed citations, included no edit summary, and were marked as "minor". In fact, every edit you've made has been marked "minor". Citations are very important to Wikipedia articles, especially about political figures, and (if possible) should be fixed or replaced rather than removed. Edit summaries are very useful in explaining the reasons for changes, helping other editors to assess them ... and your motives. And the "minor" checkbox is intended only for edits that don't make substantive changes ... and unexplained removal of citations don't count. If your intent is to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, please replace your chronic misuse of "minor" checks with edit summaries. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I am occasionally instructed to go through certain Wikipedia pages and check for dead links. If I am able to replace the link, I do. I added new citations to Sally Kern's page as well as removed ones that were dead. My only intention in that case is to remove/replace the citations that lead to nowhere. I have never visited a page with the intention to remove work done by others. As for the issue of the "minor" checkbox, that is simply how I was trained to go about my work, but I will make a conscious effort in the future to use that more sparingly. Amcdougal (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Della Warrior Article

		The Original Barnstar
		Congratulations on your Della Warrior article. Bruin2 (talk) 04:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amcdougall. Thank you for your contribution of Della Warrior article, which I had the pleasure of reviewing for the Did You Know nomination. I think it's a worthwhile addition to Wikipedia, and hope you will continue contributing articles. It seems you have excellent access to valuable source material at OSU. The references you cited seem to have additional detailed information about Warrior that could be included to give more insight into what she has done and how she went about it. I believe that would reinforce the concept of her notability and improve the likelihood of elevating the article class and importance. I also intend to add the article to the WP:Oklahoma project, since she was a native. The article seems to imply that she no longer lives there. Bruin2 (talk) 04:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nancy Virtue Lewis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harding High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice work

I have been reviewing links, categories, etc. on your files. You are doing really nice work and contributing so much to adding women to Oklahoma's historical record. Thank you! I noticed that on your politicians, they are not linked to the pages for the sessions in which they served. The easiest way to make that link is to press the "What links here" under tools on the left. If you do not see something like 39th Oklahoma Legislature, then click on the link. At the very bottom of the page is a chart labeled Oklahoma State Legislatures by year convened. Select the appropriate year and look for your subject on the page. More than likely, their name has not been bracketed. Place brackets around their name, save and go to the next year of their service, if applicable, to bracket the name.

Don't know if you are aware of this page either Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame. I have noticed a few links that showed no articles when actually an article existed with a slight name change. Keep up the great work! If you need anything, feel free to ping me. SusunW (talk) 13:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of clean up things.

I went through your creations in March and added all the Women to the Wikipedia Women's History page. I don't think I missed any, but you might double check. Article had to go to mainspace in March or have updates in March. Wikipedia:WikiWomen's History Month/2015/Outcomes
A couple of pages had "orphan tags." That means that they do not have any other pages linked to them on the "What links here" tool. It was easily fixed by linking them to the legislative sessions pages. I fixed both Debbie Blackburn and Carolyn Coleman's orphan status with legislative page links. On Anita Fields I added her as a notable alumni on Institute of American Indian Arts.
Jan Collins had a "more references needed" tag. This may be applied if either there are not in-line citations or if there is only 1 citation. I added 3 more and removed the tag. SusunW (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Della Warrior

On 10 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Della Warrior, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Della Warrior, the first female chair of the Otoe-Missouria Tribe, developed a permanent campus for the Institute of American Indian Arts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Della Warrior. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca Hamilton (Oklahoma Legislator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockyards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Vance Trimble) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Vance Trimble, Amcdougal!

Wikipedia editor Ormr2014 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You may want to touch up the writing style a bit, as the article has a sort of "monotone" style of writing. Otherwise, the article is well-written.

To reply, leave a comment on Ormr2014's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Betty Price

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Amcdougal, thanks for creating Betty Price!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pat Woodrum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ALA and OLA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Jean Russell

I'm a reporter in OKC and I'm working on a piece about Rep. Russell. I'm on the hunt for more research options; does OSU have materials? Feel free to chat on my talk page or find me through my page. Thanks Ddenwalt (talk) 22:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Taylor (Artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drafted. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership

You are invited! → World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership ← Come and join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Ipigott (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Miller (journalist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TODAY and Westminster College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Amcdougal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terry Neese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terry Neese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Neese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judy Coser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judy Coser, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Coser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]