User talk:Amaury/2020/March
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Amaury. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Need more eyes here, as there's been an attempt to WP:G13 the draft. I actually think this one may be viable, but I haven't had the time/interest to invest in it. But I suspect it may meet WP:NACTOR, and it actually has more of the type of sourcing you'd for WP:BASIC need as compared to Olivia Rodrigo (which was approved at WP:AfC eventually anyway). It just needs some work and a search for more recent sourcing. Pinging Magitroopa too, in the hopes that they may be willing to work on this too. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Still watching. Amaury • 01:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- I guess I'm saying, if you want to take a look at editing/improving it, that would be great. I may try myself, but I never did get back to this one, so if one or two other editors take a shot at it, I think we might be able to get a version to mainspace... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I'll do my best. I can try tomorrow while I'm at college. All I have is my work study, so I'm right there on a desktop, only really interrupted when students have questions. Amaury • 01:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- I guess I'm saying, if you want to take a look at editing/improving it, that would be great. I may try myself, but I never did get back to this one, so if one or two other editors take a shot at it, I think we might be able to get a version to mainspace... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Closure of "User:Wikieditor19920" at WP:AN/I
Hi, I'm curious - I did the report against Wikieditor19920, but you asked Wikieditor19920 if they thought everything was resolved. Is there a reason you didn't talk to the editor who made the ANI report? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: I did say in my close if there were any objections to the closure, I'd be happy to re-open. Is there anything that you feel is still unresolved for that particular matter? In other words, do you still have concerns about the reported user on that particular subject? Or are your concerns about another aspect of the user's editing? If the latter, I personally feel a new thread would be more appropriate, but if it's the former, I'd be happy to re-open it. Although if you feel strongly enough, I'd be happy to re-open it either way. Amaury • 20:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- There's a thread ongoing about Sharam that is involving that editor as well, and a few editors have expressed concerns about his behavior there. I'm glad he (finally) recognized that what he did in my case was wrong, but that doesn't seem to have carried over to his other behavior. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: All right, so do you think it would be beneficial if the thread were re-opened or should discussion just continue in the other thread you mentioned? I'll more than happily re-open it if you feel it would be beneficial. Better to re-open than to leave it closed if there are still some loose threads. Amaury • 21:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Whatever you feel like; in this case I'm not sure the underlying behavior of the editor has changed, and I think that needs to be addressed. You can read this, I haven't followed the situation but I get the impression many are tired of dealing with this editor. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: As I'm not familiar with the case, I will re-open the thread as there are some still some loose threads and concerns regarding the user and leave future closures to those more familiar with the case. I don't plan to involve myself with the thread, however, other than to re-open it. Amaury • 21:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Amaury, since you've waded into this as closer already , may I suggest merging the two threads, and then closing those sub-parts that you think should be closed? It may help focus on what remains to be resolved, if anything. Levivich [dubious – discuss] 21:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Given that I acknowledged the striking mistake to Mr. Vernon prior to his opening a thread at ANI, yet he refused to acknowledged violating WP:TALKOWN on my page, his canvassing [1][2][3][4] that same thread, and comments on another thread essentially attacking me, I'd say this user is engaging in ANI-warring. That's not a game I think is worth playing and I think we could've put this matter to rest a long time ago, and this was a perfect opportunity to do so, but I'm not going to tell him how to spend his time. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Levivich, a good proposal, thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Levivich: Yes. As soon as I am back on a computer. Amaury • 23:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Amaury, I oppose merging the thread I opened regarding another user's personal attacks against me with this thread filed by Vernon. A legitimate issue that I raised doesn't deserve to be subsumed by Vernon's thread. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Amaury—you should understand the origin of this. Mr. Vernon wrote in an AfD
"What makes this one unusual?" Please see Missing white woman syndrome.
[5] That is off-topic—a victim being white is not a reason to delete an article. Wikieditor19920 nicely asks Mr. Vernon to undo that comment. You can see that here under "Your comment at Murder of Tessa Majors deletion discussion". The Murder of Tessa Majors has nothing to do with Missing white woman syndrome. And of course when Mr. Vernon presented their argument for the deletion of that article they made no mention of Race (human categorization) and certainly no mention of Missing white woman syndrome—as you can see here. Bus stop (talk) 02:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: As I'm not familiar with the case, I will re-open the thread as there are some still some loose threads and concerns regarding the user and leave future closures to those more familiar with the case. I don't plan to involve myself with the thread, however, other than to re-open it. Amaury • 21:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Whatever you feel like; in this case I'm not sure the underlying behavior of the editor has changed, and I think that needs to be addressed. You can read this, I haven't followed the situation but I get the impression many are tired of dealing with this editor. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr. Vernon: All right, so do you think it would be beneficial if the thread were re-opened or should discussion just continue in the other thread you mentioned? I'll more than happily re-open it if you feel it would be beneficial. Better to re-open than to leave it closed if there are still some loose threads. Amaury • 21:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- There's a thread ongoing about Sharam that is involving that editor as well, and a few editors have expressed concerns about his behavior there. I'm glad he (finally) recognized that what he did in my case was wrong, but that doesn't seem to have carried over to his other behavior. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Pinging IJBall to this as well. With the KCAs getting postponed, it looks like Nick is changing their schedule. While Futon Critic and their own TV schedule on their site (Yes, I know, still WP:NOTRS, just mentioning it...) have yet to update, Zap2it (image link) and their official Instagram bio (image link) have both now updated to say it is premiering on Saturday, March 21 at 8pm ET. Just a heads up before Futon does eventually update and with users/IP changing the date to 21 on the article. Magitroopa (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Zap2it still shows March 22. Amaury • 18:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You are making disruptive edits by reverting peoples changes for no reason, seemingly because I somehow upset you. Quit griefing the page, people have worked hard to put this together and being an ignorant vigilante is harmful to the community. If you have an issue we can have civil discourse, because neither of us want to have a pissing match where we revert each others changes indefinitely. KingOwnageXV (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Re this edit, did Dr. Colosso appear on Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn? While I didn't really watch that show, this does ring a bell... But I don't know if it was an uncredited cameo appearance or not, and I figured you would. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Yes, the third season finale, but there was no higher-level guest or special guest star credit. Amaury • 15:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- So was Snyder credited at all? Because, if he was, that's probably good enough for a Filmography. But if he wasn't credited at all, and it was an uncredited appearance, then I'm going to revert as unsourced. Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Unfortunately, I do not remember. @Starforce13: Do you happen to remember if Dana Snyder was credited at all in "The Wonderful Wizard of Quads"? Amaury • 15:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, they credited him as: "Dana Snyder as the Voice of Dr. Colosso" and they also credited the puppeteers like they do on The Thundermans. That was actually the real confirmation that it was truly Colosso since they never mentioned his name in the show. If you have Hulu, the episode is still there, you can confirm. — Starforce13 15:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Starforce13: We can take your word on it. Plus, I don't have Hulu, anyway. LOL (I don't know about IJBall.) Amaury • 16:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Haha, no problem! — Starforce13 16:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Starforce13: We can take your word on it. Plus, I don't have Hulu, anyway. LOL (I don't know about IJBall.) Amaury • 16:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, they credited him as: "Dana Snyder as the Voice of Dr. Colosso" and they also credited the puppeteers like they do on The Thundermans. That was actually the real confirmation that it was truly Colosso since they never mentioned his name in the show. If you have Hulu, the episode is still there, you can confirm. — Starforce13 15:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Unfortunately, I do not remember. @Starforce13: Do you happen to remember if Dana Snyder was credited at all in "The Wonderful Wizard of Quads"? Amaury • 15:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- So was Snyder credited at all? Because, if he was, that's probably good enough for a Filmography. But if he wasn't credited at all, and it was an uncredited appearance, then I'm going to revert as unsourced. Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
This needs cleanup, if you're interested. (I don't have the time or the stomach for it right now...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Got a stomach flu? Feel better! I'll take a look at it tomorrow. Amaury • 05:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Done. I'm intentionally leaving the country blank as there's no clear-cut source on that. This is similar to Big City Greens, where before its premiere we weren't entirely sure whether the original network was Disney Channel or Disney XD. As we know, just because something is produced in Canada does not mean it's a Canadian series or vice-versa. This was discussed at Talk:List of Max & Shred episodes#Zap2it's Air Dates. Amaury • 05:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
I'll let you and/or MPFitz1968 try to explain, because this guy's not "getting it". (And, IIRC, it's not the first time...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I understand what you said, but you're being unduly hostile, patronising & demanding - claiming that have to I submit a draft before it can be approved & added - as though you're the article's gatekeeper. The place for discussing the article is its talk page, rather than here. The previous time was when you wrongly removed applicable project banners from the talk page as well as reinstated a forum comment & non-request which shouldn't have been there. You could have altered the episode summary to how you wanted in a small proportion of the time you've taken to repeatedly unfairly criticise me. Jim Michael (talk) 17:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)