Jump to content

User talk:AmaranthRose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Amaranth Rose. I would like to leave you a poem from my field director this year: "We dug what we should have left undug We left undue what we should have dug This makes no sense" -JKP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoleslaw22 (talkcontribs) 21:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, AmaranthRose, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

1. Move the “Nok Culture” Infobox to the introductory paragraph instead of having it inside the “Sculptures” subsection. It seems more relevant there.

2. Much of the page feels squished by all the pictures/sidebars. Seems cluttered to me.

3. Make an outline for what the rest of your article will be. Gives a feel for the scope and whether you will need more sources.

4. I would recommend a section about the terracottas and their illegal status on the international art market.

I like what you did to the introduction. It seems much more formal as an introduction to the rest of the article. All of your little changes to what was there before make the article feel much more scholarly. The preliminary archaeology section is a great start to the improvement/expansion of this article. I would recommend a section on what the general significance of Nok culture is today. Given the improvements that have already been made, you’re on the right track.

Esuabeht97 (talk) 18:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

I like the pictures and all the descriptions of the sites and the pottery. You have a good start to the repatriations section, I would also like to see a section about why the repatriation is necessary, so how/what/when are people stealing?DaFlyingFishmonger (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]