User talk:AmIAGirl3

November 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmIAGirl3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block happened in 2015. I waited more than 6 months without editing. After that, I put in an unblock request, and it was ignored. My punishment has been longer than it should've been, and completely unfair. I have promised that I will not violate the 3RR rule again, as that was what got me blocked. I would also like to say that I don't know many of the rules here, so having a link to them would be very helpful and appreciated. Also, if I am doing something wrong, a warning would be helpful, as I was not given a warning before being blocked for violating the 3RR rule. Ultimately, I have learned from my mistake, and promise to do my best to edit Wikipedia constructively and accurately. Please give me a second chance. AmIAGirl3 (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Your request to be unblocked is currently being discussed on the talk page of your original account PeopleEater143. Your user talk page rights have not been revoked and you may edit your user talk page there. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user just admitted to being PeopleEater143 at User talk:PeopleEater143#Please help me, which was blocked in 2017, not 2015. You very clearly were told about 3RR plenty of times on IP address throughout 2017 and probably before. There is a long history of documented (and reported) sockpuppetry by you. You are feigning being a newbie and being uninformed to elicit sympathy, and it's not going to happen. Nowhere did this user promise to stop breaking 3RR; they did it just this morning using Special:Contributions/156.12.249.29 so this is just outright lying. Ss112 20:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I said that I was going to revert your edits because I felt that you were being unfair to me. I feel that Wikipedia in general is being unfair to me and never kept their word to unblock me after I went 6 months without editing. If my account ever became unblocked, I wouldn't violate the rules. AmIAGirl3 (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no. That's not an excuse. "Why does everybody hate me" is not an attitude that's going to win you any sympathy here. You never went six months without editing, and there's proof of that. Regardless, you're back evading your block now. Even if you did wait six months, it would be pointless to state that as you are back sockpuppeting using this account. You are 100% straight-up lying and you're dreaming if you think anybody would unblock you if they knew about your history. Ss112 20:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]