User talk:AlphaBetaGamma01

Welcome!

Hello, ThE~fUtUrE~2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Proposed tall buildings and structures. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes of 2015

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Tornadoes of 2015, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Tornadoes of 2014. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Earthquakes in 2015, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 10:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tornadoes of 2015

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tornadoes of 2015 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dustin (talk) 23:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I have improperly applied the criterion, but this article could be applied to any other tornado year at the beginning, and in its current state, it is of no use. The article should not be created until the formation of tornado #1, which will undoubtedly be soon. Until then, this article has no use. I have created a draft which may be moved to mainspace (I have formatted the article already; it is Draft:Tornadoes of 2015), and it contains more information. The reason I did not move the article I am tagging to draftspace is that it contains contributions other than my own so I do not have rights over. Dustin (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tornadoes of 2015 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tornadoes of 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornadoes of 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dustin (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earthquakes in 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferndale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Year articles

Please read WP:RY for guidance as to what should be included. Also, there is a general consensus that month subheadings should not be added unless a complete pattern should be added. I reverted your edit to 2062, but I'm on a smartphone at the moment, so cannot easily fix your edits. ~~Please self-revert. I'll take care of them this evening if you don't, but I won't be happy about it.~~ — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

here Planecrashexpert (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 20:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tokyo Tower of Babel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tokyo Tower of Babel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Tower of Babel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikko. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2003, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chuquisaca and New Ireland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanki X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WPac ACE totals table

Hello there. Was it you who placed the table for ACE totals for the WPac? If it is, cool! I actually had a thought about that and placed a version in one of my sandboxes. I am planning to finish some by this holidays. Tbh this is hard work for me because I have to do the maths from older JMA and JTWC advisories. I'll replace yours with mine first if it is ok. I will help you with this as well. Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wrong person. :P Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Tajikistan earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Murghab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Good job on your edits on List of Earthquakes in 2016, you done us well Planecrashexpert (talk) 08:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iliamna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hero Alom. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

You should report it rather than edit-warring, thanks. NgYShung ^huh? 10:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Dollhouse (Melanie Martinez song), ThE~fUtUrE~2014.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This page has no content. Please read the instructions for patrolling pages at WP:NPP. Thanks

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Florida hurricanes

Hi,

I noticed that you recently moved List of Florida hurricanes (2000–present) to List of tropical cyclones in Florida (2000–present) on the basis that not all storms were officially classified as hurricanes. It's important to remember that in most casual and even many scientific settings, we use "hurricane" to refer to all tropical systems in the Atlantic and eastern Pacific. Officially, the National Hurricane Center calls it the annual hurricane season, and here on Wikipedia, we've generally decided that "hurricane" is the more concise and accessible term to use in article titles (like Atlantic hurricane, History of Atlantic hurricane warnings, etc). Moreover, there are dozens of articles in Category:Lists of tropical cyclones in the United States that would need to be moved for consistency with your change. I've reverted your move for now, so if you'd like to peruse it further, please start a discussion at an appropriate venue. Thank you. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

NGC 164

added a link pointing to German

NGC 180

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 182

added a link pointing to Pisces

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kuururjuaq National Park) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kuururjuaq National Park, ThE~fUtUrE~2014!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added some categories, linked to the Canada and Protected Areas wikiprojects on the talk page, and linked to the French wikipedia article.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (North Aulatsivik Island) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating North Aulatsivik Island, ThE~fUtUrE~2014!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a citation and a category. Also clarified that the elevation is an average value.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Ulittaniujalik National Park) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ulittaniujalik National Park, ThE~fUtUrE~2014!

Wikipedia editor Randeerjayasekara just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please add a location map to this page? Thank you for creating this page.

To reply, leave a comment on Randeerjayasekara's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kuururjuaq National Park

added links pointing to Black bear and Whitefish

NGC 186

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 190

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 193

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 194

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 198

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 199

added a link pointing to Pisces

NGC 200

added a link pointing to Pisces

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 9 September 2016 Baghdad bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bezymyannoye, Atyrau

You created an article without sources, and I had to spend about half an hour to figure out that it does not exist. It is not in the database of the Kazakhstan localities, it is not in the census, and I found no evidence that it is an old name of the locality which was renamed. It is easy to check that the coordinates are for Ganyushkino. It might be a quarter of Ganyushkino, but I suspect that you just collect names from Google maps and bump them into Wikipedia without actually checking with reliable sources. If this is correct, you need to (a) stop doing this immediately; (b) if there are other articles you created in a similar way, please go and revisit them, before someone deletes them as a hoax, and you, as a hoax writer, would be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

AlternativaPlatform

added a link pointing to Russian

Lackovce

added a link pointing to Zemplén

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AlternativaPlatform moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AlternativaPlatform, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 17:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neiafu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not nonsense

You tagged] the article Story of Phillip Archer with {{db-nonsense}}. This speedy deletion criterion is very narrowly defined to include only text that cannot be meaningfully interpreted in any language. Clearly, this article can be meaningfully interpreted. The subject is obviously completely non-notable (and I have changed the db tag accordingly), but the text itself is not gibberish. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was assuming that it would go under that criterion because the last two paragraphs looked like some random fantasy wishes, hence the previous db tag. Glad that got cleared up! AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 13:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Borodinovka) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Borodinovka, AlphaBetaGamma01!

Wikipedia editor Ymblanter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I am sorry to come again, but YOU SHOULD STOP creating articles based solely on Geo Names, it is extremely unreliable. This one was renamed in 2011, and has a corresponding Russian article and an entry in the Census.

To reply, leave a comment on Ymblanter's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from X-shaped radio galaxy into NGC 326. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NGC article creation categorization

I have noticed that with your recent creation of articles on NGC objects (which is a project I had been meaning to do for a while, thanks for putting in your own effort to the cause!) you had been categorizing them with some atypical categories, specifically the "stem" categories Category:Astronomical objects, Category:Astronomical object articles by quality, Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery, and Category:Astronomy. Would it be possible to omit those in future articles to keep consistency? Furthermore, it would be much appreciated if you also sorted Category:NGC objects to the NGC number (NGC 300 would be 0300, for instance) and sorted Category:Astronomical objects discovered in [year] by the YYYYMMDD of discovery. Again, many thanks! exoplanetaryscience (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlphaBetaGamma01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digits

Thank you for your recent edit to Southernmost settlements. However, I have reverted it because as I understand to MOS:DIGITS, commas are only included in numbers with five or more digits. It can be frustrating to keep all of the different parts of the manual of style in mind, and I hope that you or others will point it out to me when my edits need to be changed to conform to WP:MOS. Thanks for your work to improve this encyclopedia, and happy editing! YBG (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improving your NGC object articles

Hello, I've noticed you've been creating articles for some of the NGC objects. Thank you very much for doing that! Just some suggestions to improve them:

Many NGC objects are not galaxies, they are open clusters or stars, so use {{Infobox open cluster}} or {{Starbox short}}, etc. for those.

Also, for {{Infobox galaxy}} the |type= parameter is actually the morphological type of the galaxy (like Sa, Sb, Sc, E0, S0), not the object type. So just putting "G" for that is a bit unhelpful, since "G" only stands for galaxy.

The |dist_ly= parameter is for distance. Distances can often be found on NED, but they are given in megaparsecs. To convert them to Mly (million light years), use the {{convert}} template.

If you look up the object name on Wikimedia Commons, you may find an image for the galaxy.

I hope this advice was helpful. Thanks, Loooke (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this was really helpful. Just a question though: how would I find the morphological classification of the objects I'm looking for? Would they be found on NED, or somewhere else? Cheers, AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 10:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Loooke: I have edited your post above to take advantage of the templates {{tl}} and {{para}} which I have found quite useful and I think you might also. YBG (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@YBG: I didn't know about {{tl}} and {{para}} before, thank you very much!
@AlphaBetaGamma01: Glad I could help. You can find morphological classifications on NED: there's a section that says "Classifications", and then a row that says "Galaxy Morphology." For example, NGC 413's morphological type is "SB(r)c:" or "SB(r)c?" – either one is fine.
SIMBAD also has morphological types. However, they are sometimes listed as numbers, like "5" for NGC 413. To convert these numbers to the de Vaucouleurs class, use this chart here. Loooke (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, one more question: how do I find the standard deviation of a galaxy (for distance), since we can't precisely get the exact answer? AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 10:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 06:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The standard deviation of the galaxy distance is also given in NED. For NGC 413, for example, there's a table that looks like this:

NGC 0413	Distance modulus (mag)	Metric Distance (Mpc)
Mean	34.28	72.050
Std. Dev.	0.30	10.112
Min.	34.06	64.900
Max.	34.49	79.200
Median	34.28	72.050

You would take the mean metric distance, the standard deviation of the metric distance, and put it into code like this: {{convert|72.050|+/-|10.112|Mpc|Mly|abbr=on|lk=on|order=flip}} Loooke (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 10:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AlternativaPlatform

Hello, AlphaBetaGamma01. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AlternativaPlatform".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of earthquakes in 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yakutat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For many galaxies far, far away. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 07:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your tireless work creating articles for WikiProject Astronomy. It's been a great help for me and other editors, too. Please keep up the good work!

1.6180339887 golden^{sqᴉɹʇuoɔ} 22:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks so much! AlphaBetaGamma^{DeltaEpsilonZeta} 12:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlphaBetaGamma01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlphaBetaGamma01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlphaBetaGamma01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ostrožnica (disambiguation)

The article Ostrožnica (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary and therefore potentially confusing orphan dab page - new dab page at Ostroznica includes these two and another form

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"R̥̄" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect R̥̄ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 3#R̥̄ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"D̂" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect D̂ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 23 § D̂ until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NGC 396 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGC 396 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 396 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SkyFlubbler (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]