Jump to content

User talk:Loooke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Loooke, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Loooke! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Want to help shape the future of the Wikipedia editing experience?

[edit]

Hi Loooke,

The Design Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation is currently seeking relatively newcomer Wikipedians for user studies about their experience with current editing tools and to test out some prototype editing tools. If you’re interested in helping to shape the future of editing on Wikipedia, we would love to have you participate! The study session will take approximately 30 minutes, maximum of 45 minutes.

The study will take place in the next couple weeks, and will require participants to have access to a webcam and microphone (or a laptop with built in cam & mic), with a quiet place to go for a research session. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org and include the following information:

  • Username
  • Email where we can reach you
  • Your city or time zone
  • Best time to talk to you

Please let me know if you have any questions! Look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Daisy Chen

User Experience Researcher Dchen (WMF) (talk) 01:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Pr0201-b. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed.

But anyhow, happy Christmas! :) — Smjg (talk) 01:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HotCat

[edit]

You might like to try the HotCat gadget, activated in your preferences, on the gadgets tab, editing section. Inline editing and autocomplete of categories, very fast and convenient. Apologies if you already knew about it and don't like it. Lithopsian (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (NGC 5264) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating NGC 5264, Loooke!

Wikipedia editor Dps04 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Dps04's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dps04 (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of exoplanets

[edit]

So, when are you going to fix the discovery dates? It's a serious problem and if I reverted your edits, it'd be justifiable. Holy Goo (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, revert what edits? I'm fixing the discovery dates right now, in stages, for example this edit. Loooke (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On this subject, when you update the main page, would you mind updating my user subpage(s) as well? I needed a proof-of-concept before getting final opinions and going "live". They're split by year as mentioned in the various talk page discussions, so it might need moving from one page to another if a year is wrong. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 16:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac, I'll try to do what I can. However, since I've fixed all the dates, and made a few changes since then, it may be easier to split the page entirely again. (Sorry.) Loooke (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Starbox astrometry edit

[edit]

This edit created some peculiar additions to some of the infoboxes: ?'"`UNIQ−-ref-00000008-QINU`"'?. See for example Tau Ceti. Praemonitus (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was WP:BOLD and reverted your edits to this template because it messed up too many pages. Praemonitus (talk) 20:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, sorry about the attempt. My goal was to have the template automatically replace hyphens with minus signs, like the {{DEC}} template. If done correctly it would enable you to type, for example, -3 instead of −3. I noticed it did cause the weird unicode error, but I looked back and couldn't fix the error. If you can properly implement this, please go ahead! Loooke (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it should do the opposite, per MOS:MINUS. Please see the next post. Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I know. What I meant by the previous sentence was that the hyphen in the -3 (which is incorrect) would automatically be replaced with a minus sign (which is correct). The edit to {{Starbox astrometry}} was intended to make editing easier so that one wouldn't have to type "−" every time a minus sign was needed. Thanks. Loooke (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understood your intention. This looks related to the error message: Help:Lua_for_beginners#Issues_with_the_current_implementation. Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minus HTML symbol

[edit]

Note that there is an HTML symbol for the minus (− = −) that is different than a dash. We should be using the former, not the latter. See MOS:MINUS. Praemonitus (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

[edit]

Hello. I did a page move that I thought would be helpful with a simpler nomenclature per naming conventions. The new (and current) title is P/2006 VW139. After looking at all the links to the former page title and then looking at the infobox I have decided this may not have been a good idea. It seems to be a new page, according to the edit history, which is all I looked at prior to making the move. However, there are a large number of links to the former page title in "What links here".

I am requesting admin help by moving this back [1], and I will seek consensus for a name change on the talk page later. I don't want to cause a disruption to WikiProject Astronomy by having carried out this action. And I apologize to you for not being more careful in this instance. Regards - Steve Quinn (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Nobel Peace Prize article

[edit]

Thanks again for placing the "expand section' template on October 9th in the Reactions section. Now that it has been expanded, would you please take a look to determine whether it sufficiently responds to the expansion request? Litjade (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Thank you! Loooke (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BD+03 2562 article

[edit]

Thanks for your edits on the article, BD+03 2562. But where was your reference when you added that the star is part of the constellation Virgo? I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME! (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I used this site which takes the coordinates of the system and outputs the constellation that it's in. I didn't cite the source because it's implicit in the coordinates (11 50 15.5527 +02 45 36.472). Also, most other articles on stars (like Sirius, Vega, Rigel etc.) don't say the reference. Loooke (talk) 00:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Loooke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Exoplanets

[edit]

I've created Draft:List of exoplanets discovered in 2018 for when there's actually data. Nothing there at the moment obviously but when there is it'll save you a bit of time :) Thanks for doing the legwork on keeping these pages updated! Primefac (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, thanks for the new draft! Loooke (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of nearest galaxies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andromeda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LS 5039, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scutum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 3545B

[edit]

You do know it isn't listed on the page you redirected to? Might make it harder to defend when the people who just voted to keep it as an article come complaining. Or not: I think only the creator was really excited about the article. Lithopsian (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True. I've updated the page so it includes NGC 3545B, as well as NGC 3545. Loooke (talk) 22:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

[edit]

Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the List_of_nearest_galaxies -- i love that page, but i never seem to have time to update it any more. Good to see someone else has picked up the baton for now.

cheers alexander110 02:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Loooke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CGCG 049-033

[edit]

Hello! As I'm a relatively young editor, I don't have extensive knowledge on subjects like astronomy. Seeing as you've helped transform the other 2 space-related articles I've created (NGC 1403 and BD+03 2562), I decided to ask help from you. I've recently created a new article (CGCG 049-033), which is pretty low-quality at the moment. Could you help improve it? I'll try improving what I can. Here are some references that could help:

UnsignificantEditor (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@UnsignificantEditor: I've added an infobox and a bit of extra prose. Most of it is from the SIMBAD database and the source you gave. Unfortunately I'm by no means an expert in radio astronomy, so that was about all I could add. Loooke (talk)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FSC 15307+3253, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HST (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NGC 538, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDSS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axinite-(Mg), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cattierite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NGC 3319, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating Q1 Eri!

[edit]

Hi Loooke - thanks for updating the wiki page for q1 Eri (HD10647) with my recently published paper - it is great to see it being disseminated beyond the publication. I have some other work that I completed earlier this year for a system that doesn't yet have a wikipedia page, and I would be interested in making a page for this. I wondered if you would be interested in working together to make one? Cheers

JoshuaBennettLovell (talk) 10:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am glad you found my edits to be useful. I have a bunch of star systems that I plan to create articles for, but unfortunately I'm a bit busy so this process is taking some time. It may be faster (and better) to just create these articles yourself, especially since you are an astronomer with more expertise on this topic, following the rules of WP:SELFCITE of course. Best, Loooke (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NSVS 14256825, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photometry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Puya alpestris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of globular clusters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassiopeia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how the NGC 1 and NGC 2 absolute magnitudes are calculated?

[edit]

I tried to recalculate the NGC1 and NGC 2 absolute magnitudes from the apparent magnitudes given in the wiki infoboxes, however does not not give the exace answers. For example, for NGC 1, my calculated absolute magnitude is -20.4 instead of -22.08 using apparent magnitude of 13.65 and distance 64.7 Mpc. From m-M values (From Hubble Flow Distance Modulus of Galactocentric GSR), I got -20.4 also. Just wonder how the absolute magnitude of -22.08 is got here. Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you. Cerevisae (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cerevisae: your apparent magnitude of -20.4 from the apparent magnitude of 13.65 and 64.7 Mpc seems correct - at least, that's what I got. There are several possible reasons why the number is different:
1. The absolute magnitude of -22.08 might be taking into account interstellar dust (i.e. interstellar extinction), which makes the object appear dimmer than it actually is.
2. The absolute magnitude of -22.08 might be calculated using different starting magnitudes. Perhaps the apparent magnitude was in a different band, like the B magnitude, which is commonly used for galaxies. Or the distance value might have been different.
I prefer to take absolute magnitudes from the literature, even if they may contradict with apparent magnitudes and distances. This is because it might be against Wikipedia's No Original Research policy, but arguably it falls under a routine calculation. In any case, I usually don't bother calculating them. Anyway, best of luck. Loooke (talk) 17:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your info! :-) Cerevisae (talk) 07:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beta Cancri b

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Loooke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beta Cancri b, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beta Cancri b

[edit]

Hello, Loooke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beta Cancri b".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:26, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox galaxy

[edit]

Hello Loooke.

I'm working to improve the astronomical region of Wikipedia. I've seen your edits here and there, thank you for your efforts! You seem like the right person to ask about this. I just added 'Surface brightness' to the infobox galaxy. The 'Surface brightness specify' was broken and nobody used it, ever. The one I added is working just fine but I'm still getting the old 'Surface brightness specify' on the selection field with the sentence (undocumented parameter). There's also another one in there with the same problem called 'credit'. I've tried to fix this by removing them but I can't find their location anywhere on the template.

Since you're very experienced with infoboxes and the like, I'm wondering if you could explain to me how to fix that issue.

Thanks for any help you can give me! DGSATI (talk) 22:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DGSATI: Hi there! I looked at this edit and at the moment, it doesn't seem like there's anything with your edit that would cause any problems. The one thing I could think of is that maybe it just took a while to update, which was why you still saw 'Surface brightness specify'. I'm not sure though.
If the problem still persists elsewhere, maybe you could provide a link to broken article or something? Thanks! Loooke (talk) 05:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looke, it seems I jumped the gun on this one, you're probably right, I think it just took a while to update because the problem just vanished. I freaked out a little because it's a template thousands of pages are using.
Thank you for taking the time to respond. DGSATI (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! Thanks for helping with the templates. Editing templates is a bit difficult, and I am certainly not an expert at it either. Loooke (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on HD 72945

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page HD 72945, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loooke&oldid=1207958236"