User talk:AlokeAlokeAloke

Wrong place

Your User page is the wrong place to create and then submit a draft. Use WP:YFA to create a draft and then submit it for review. Once you have created the draft, remove all the content from your User page. See WP:UP for what DOES belong on a User page. David notMD (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely grateful for the prompt review. I have made all the necessary changes. Hopefully the article it will be accepted and published.

Thanks AlokeAlokeAloke (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar (lawyer) (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by User4edits were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apart from one reference [1], I do not find any other source mentioning him as a civil servant. Please do not try to game the system. In any case, notability is not established. Media mentions are PR pieces, and Addl Secy rank is not inherently notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 01:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AlokeAlokeAloke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 01:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar (lawyer) (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Important note: what is needed is not multiple copies of the same press release, published in different places. The "new" sources added to the introduction in this edit and this edit are not new sources, they are the same source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar (lawyer) (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Government appointments rarely make a person Wikipedia-notable. Having many refs about the announcement of his appointment add nothing to notability. David notMD (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, I have made necessary adjustments within my draft and it is currently waiting for review. This is my first Wikipedia article, starting with someone who I consider as my mentor. Could you please help me with a speedy review process as I would like to present him his published page as a gift?

thank you

AlokeAlokeAloke AlokeAlokeAloke (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar (lawyer) (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bhairava7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoj Kumar (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 11:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar (lawyer) (October 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Primary sources do not establish notability. After multiple earlier declines, if these are the best sources available, I can only conclude that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion. To avoid further reviewer time being expended on this, I am therefore rejecting rather than merely declining this draft.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]