User talk:Almighty34

August 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of Telugu people does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to M. Karunanidhi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC) ==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Damarla Chennapa Nayakadu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (C. Jagannatha Rao) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating C. Jagannatha Rao.

User:Path slopu while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your contributions. I have reviewed your article and have some suggestions. It is better if you can add some categories, sections to the article. Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 15:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, சுப்பராய சாஸ்திரி

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, சுப்பராய சாஸ்திரி. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Subbaraya Sastri. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Subbaraya Sastri. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muthuracha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muthuracha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The4lines (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Almighty34

Thank you for creating Muthuracha.

User:QueerEcofeminist, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Better try, please write more context and sources to this article. You can ping me for help on how to find sources. thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 20:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muthuraja

I am having to revert you edits at Muthuraja. The quotes you provide do not seem to support the statements and, worse, it is clear that you are using very selective search phrases via Google Books etc. That practice leads to confirmation bias and is not acceptable, sorry. I also think you are actually misreading the article because it looks like what you are trying to prove is that the community are of Telugu origin rather than Tamil but in fact the article says they are mostly Tamil speaking, which is not the same thing as a statement as to their origin. - Sitush (talk) 07:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sitush (talk) 08:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to discuss the recent changes to Muthuraja. Please do so at Talk:Muthuraja and obtain consensus for a preferred version. My revert is not an acceptance of the article now being "the right version". - Sitush (talk) 07:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muthuraja

Muthuraja never called Valaiyar so please avoid Muthuraja page unwanted edit.Madraskalai (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mudiraj

have seen the article and It says "communities in the Andhra-Telangana region, community in recent years has been influenced by Hindutva ideology and have been more assertive against Dalits". This statement is super personal and cannot be generalized into one community or class. There hasn't been been one particular statement proving this in the recent history and it should be the subject of high risk for other users who read this article. Hence I request you to please check and possibly edit/remove this and sorry to say this but do not make a personal obligation without knowing what it means to the society. Thank you. Vishalsanga99 (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi Almighty34! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Balija that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 04:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir--Almighty34 (talk) 08:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madurai Nayak dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garikapati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i'm sorry i will change--Almighty34 (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shivappa Nayaka

Hello, I’ve noticed you have added Shivappa Nayaka as balija king, but the source youve referenced clearly states it was during Bhadrappa Nayaka’s time that power came to banajigas. Please remove Shivappa nayaka from list of Balija rulers in Balija page. Thank you. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.277202/page/n55/mode/2up

Bitterpill99 (talk) 08:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chennapatna Raya

thank you for your earlier correction of shivappa nayaka. In Balija page you have mentioned channapatna rayas “who ruled Bangalore”. Please remove this reference to bangalore. Channapatna raya ruled channapatna, and not Bangalore which was ruled by their contemporaries Yelahanka nadaprabhus. Thank you Bitterpill99 (talk) 02:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balija, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Descendant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nayakas of Belur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive referencing

I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish at Gavara, but in most cases, an article's reference section shouldn't be 4x longer than the article itself. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you that I will not repeat the mistake in the future. thank you sir for your guidance.--Almighty34 (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balija Medieval History I think I can agree what you said about Mukundadeva. I do not see anywhere in the referenced inscription where it says that Balijas have lived in Orugallu. You said, "Balija as a community is seen for the first time in a Panyam Inscription (AD.1319) of Kakatiya king Prataparudradeva." Panyam is in Kurnool and that is mentioned in the description of the inscription. My advise is to include that also in the article in the Medieval History section by creating a heading for Eastern Chalukyas or Gajapathis, which ever is appropriate. I think there must be a section for pre-medival history as Balijas origin can be traced from much earlier than 500AD and many earlier books on Balijas have referenced mauryan, satavahan, pallava and vishnukundin times as well.