User talk:Bitterpill99
Bitterpill99, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Bitterpill99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC) |
May 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Krishnadevaraya. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
331dot (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Stop reverting sourced edits!
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Wormholexx (talk) 07:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ping respective admin @331dot, this Bitterpill account is constantly removing WP:RS contents which doesn't suits his pov from Kalabhra. You have already warned this account for past disruption in Indian topics on 10th may 2021. Please help. Wormholexx (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wormholexx If I look at this, I'm going to look at everyone involved, including you. I suggest that you two find a way to work this out. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I AGF, the content that he remove is WP:RS. If it is not RS, please remove it from the article. I welcome your decision wholeheartedly. Wormholexx (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Admins do not settle content disputes. If you are unable to work this out through talk page discussion, use dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 17:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, it helps a lot. Thanks for your time. Wormholexx (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Admins do not settle content disputes. If you are unable to work this out through talk page discussion, use dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 17:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I AGF, the content that he remove is WP:RS. If it is not RS, please remove it from the article. I welcome your decision wholeheartedly. Wormholexx (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wormholexx If I look at this, I'm going to look at everyone involved, including you. I suggest that you two find a way to work this out. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bitterpill99, comments like this edit summary concern me greatly. Racism/caste based remarks are not tolerated here. 331dot (talk) 17:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- He is accusing me I'm from certain race and targeting me wherever I involve. It makes me quit contributing further. He doesn't even focus on contents and it's reliability. I hope he will follow WP:HERE. Wormholexx (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)