User talk:Allecher
=Robert Sapolsky
[edit]Hi Allecher, I saw you made some edits to Robert Sapolsky but I updated your citation because it had the wrong date. Would be great if you could add more to Sapolsky's biography as I think the article is in pretty poor shape and doesn't explain his ideas and achievements. I'm new to Wikipedia too, but like you, not new to computer science. Actually, I'm a bit embarrassed in myself for not being involving in Wikipedia sooner but it's never too late to start I guess. Well anyways, have a great day. Jason (talk) 05:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sapolsky page does look like some work needed, but thankfully not a ton. Jason, welcome to Wikipedia. Sgerbic (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Rhys Morgan
[edit]Rugby player sorted. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Amazing Meeting
[edit]I made a few edits, mostly to add some third-party sources to the article. Most of them could probably be linked in more places in the article, the SFWeekly article in particular is very long and has lots of details about the Connie Sonne MDC that could be put in the article. Krelnik (talk) 03:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Suggestion
[edit]I suspect that this subpage of mine will interest you, and there are names which need articles:
Brangifer (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Paul K
[edit]I took a look at my work and as of this time I agree that it was to long.
That's why it's shorter now. --Agnostihuck (talk) 00:17, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token 9278f613fdce3696f6545d5732a842f0
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 16:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nikthestunned 16:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]_by_Ron.jpg)
I'm just trying to practice a bit with random Wiki stuff, here's a kitty!
Cap020570 (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
DYK Bach
[edit]You were so kind to review BWV 22 for DYK, will you continue? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
QPQ added
[edit]Thank you! Proudbolsahye (talk) 02:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Donald Prothero
[edit] | On 18 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Donald Prothero, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Stephen Jay Gould once called Donald Prothero "the best punctuated equilibrium researcher on the West Coast"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Prothero. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Harrias talk 08:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for catching my mistake at the AW article -- I thought it was safe to make simple reverts over my phone, but this proves I should avoid it in the future. Best,
a13ean (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Here's the page you requested - User:Allecher/campquest. I'm very concerned/confused about this deletion (it was deleted for being "advertising" not for being non-notable), unfortunately I just don't have the time to properly analyze the situation right now. If you need any help I can provide let me know. CitiCat ♫ 03:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I see it's been done. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
After a bit of discussion the page is now restored (let me know if you now want the page in your space removed). I do agree with the admin who deleted it that is does require improvement. The tone of the article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, it needs to sound less like it is written by someone promoting the camp, and be more from a neutral point of view. If you still have interest in working on it that would be great. CitiCat ♫ 12:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I will be glad to clean it up a bit. I agree that it is currently overly promotional but I think I can find some secondary sources to make that more encyclopedic. You can leave my userspace copy for now. Thanks again!! Allecher (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Talk restored, thanks for taking on the task Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Allecher, I noticed that you're working on article cleanup on the Camp Quest article. I'm the Camp Quest Executive Director, and I've noticed some things that are out of date or incorrect, but I don't want to violate the conflict of interest rules and edit an article about an organization in which I have a vested interest. The biggest thing is that the list of camp locations is out of date. Since that list was made several locations have been added, and a few like Ireland have stopped running. The current list is always on the sidebar of the front page of the Camp Quest website. I know you also need more secondary sources for article cleanup. It's not completely up to date, but there is a list of some media mentions with links at http://www.campquest.org/media. I agree that the current version of the article needs work to meet encyclopedia standards, and appreciate that you are working on the article. I don't want to interfere, but if I can help, please contact me. (Forgive me if any of this differs from the community norms for handling these things. I am not an experienced Wiki editor.) Ametskas (talk) 15:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Ametskas. I think this is a great way to handle it because you have pointed me toward some secondary sources that can improve the article. I'll take a look. Meanwhile, even though you can't edit that page, you can join us at WP:SKEPTIC to find other ways to improve the quality of the skeptical pages on Wikipedia. We would love to have your help!! Allecher (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
[edit]Thanks for the welcome. I will definitely try to be more diligent in filling in the edit summary. FYI I am receiving guidance from some more experienced editors, that's why I pulled the CHILD page into my sandbox for a rewrite.MrBill3 (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
American Cancer Society Criticism section
[edit]As you were kind enough to welcome me and offer help, I would appreciate your taking a look at the American Cancer Society article. I had edited the Criticism section and my edits were undone. Please read the Talk page and or the Talk page for user Capitalismojo. I am attempting to support the use of 3 specific blog entries as sources, maintain information from a reliable source (news article) and support the validity of several sentences of criticism.MrBill3 (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Allecher
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank
[edit]I appreciate your thanks. Proxima Centauri (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Stale draft
[edit]Can this be sent to mainspace? Came up as a stale draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Allecher/Hai-Ting_Chinn Legacypac (talk) 06:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm still waiting on a few more sources to prove notability. So I guess it is a stale draft but not forgotten. Allecher (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Requesting article expansion support
[edit]Hello and greetings
I am looking for some help in article expansion support to following article:
Please do have a look at article Superstitions in Muslim societies and Talk:Superstitions in Muslim societies and please do support article expansion if you feel interested about.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 04:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Fellows of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry has been nominated for listification
[edit]
Category:Fellows of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism
[edit]Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.
The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.
Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 06:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
KF’s death
[edit]This needs a citation. May I suggest: https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/si-editor-kendrick-frazier-has-died-age-80/ Rp2006 (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)