User talk:Ali313korosh

January 2022

Your edit summary here. This was not vandalism; as you can see from the page history I was the editor who fixed a lot of formatting errors in the page with a previous edit, including moving the infobox to its correct position. It is not possible to tell how it subsequently got deleted – I was using the visual editor to fix multiple ref error msgs so it may have been one of its notorious anomalies. Vandalism is a deliberate attempt to damage the encyclopedia, which this was not, and making accusations is not a good idea. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 06:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for reaching me. I realised after I made the edit your intentions were sincere and you were fixing links I made, and, at the heat of the moment I assumed it was vandalism. My apologies. Thanks for fixing the links, I’m pretty much a rookie when it comes to Wikipedia so it’s all a learning curve for me. Ali313korosh (talk) 06:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Ali313korosh (talk) 06:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not to worry :). The most likely explanation is that I was somehow editng an older version of the article; that seems likely, given the ref. that re-appeared at the very start. The vis-ed does not seem to display a warning like the source editor does when that happens. If you are able to translate the dates in the sources, that would be useful and I noticed that the date of birth was varyingly given as 1924 / 1935. I changed the 1935 instance to 1924, but am not 100% whether that is correct? Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m assuming you mean the dates for the links in the references? I could try doing that sure. Yes you’re right about 1924, I mistakenly had 1935 written down. The issue with the years is that in Iran they’re in a different calendar to us, so for example this person’s exact DOB is not recorded, only that it was in 1303. This correlates to 1924/1925 our calendar. Thanks for helping the page. Ali313korosh (talk) 07:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the date the source was written or published; it's not vital (as I got rid of the date value flags by just removing the dates!) but *technically* it should be there. Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 08:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of ayatollahs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is well known he has passed. His page on Wikipedia also confirms this. I will add the citation in as well but it really wasn't necessary to undo an edit in this manner just because a citation was missing. Ali313korosh (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ayatollah Mirza Mahdi Ashtiani.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ayatollah Mirza Mahdi Ashtiani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:سید حسن مرتضوی شاهرودی to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Clear friend a ^💬 19:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]