User talk:Ali1872

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Agha Ashraf Ali.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Agha Ashraf Ali.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

File is in no use

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chinar (Message | Contribs) 22:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ali1872, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Ali1872!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Agha Shahid Ali.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Agha Shahid Ali.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Agha Shahid Ali Qazalbaash.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Agha Shahid Ali Qazalbaash.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Shahid Ali.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Shahid Ali.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Khan Bahadur Aga Syed hussain painting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Khan Bahadur Aga Syed hussain painting.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Aga Syed hussain painting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aga Syed hussain painting.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khan Bahadur Aga Sayed Hussain Thakkar

The article Khan Bahadur Aga Sayed Hussain Thakkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. An obscure, low-level government functionary, sourced to a plethora of unreliable sources, or sources that do not mention him at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khan Bahadur Aga Sayed Hussain Thakkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khan Bahadur Aga Sayed Hussain Thakkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan Bahadur Aga Sayed Hussain Thakkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kashmiri people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IAS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:(Hakim) Agha Muhammad Baqar Qazalbaash.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:(Hakim) Agha Muhammad Baqar Qazalbaash.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khan Bahadur Aga Syed Hussain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khan Bahadur Aga Syed Hussain, without citing a reliable source. Adding Wiki articles and other nonsensical things that clearly violate WP:RS also obviously don't count. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please note, a Wikipedia mirror site is NOT a reliable source - LouisAragon (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ali1872, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 11:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 11:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Citation needed notices

Edits such as this to Khan Bahadur Aga Syed Hussain where you have removed multiple {{citation needed}} notices without adding reference are not appreciated. You either need to supply reliable sources or the unsourced text should be removed, and can be at any time by any editor. 220 of ^Borg 11:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agha Ashraf Ali

The article Agha Ashraf Ali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 19:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Agha Shahid Ali with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 06:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting the above message and I have rolled back my reversion to the last version of the article by you. I simply made a mistake. Now that I look at your edit, I see that it was a good faith effort to improve the article. I am not sure why I pressed the reversion button so I either did not understand the edit or simply hit that option by mistake. I am sorry for the mistake and hope you will continue to make useful edits to Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Regarding this same page. and others you have created, you need to really improve your referencing and citing.

Many of your references are 'dead', in that they don't link to anything, or the URL is wrong or incomplete. For instance, you left "http://www" out of some.

Examples:

kafila.org/.../‘i-swear-i-have-my-hopes’-agha-shahid-ali’s-delhi-years/

www.greaterkashmir.com/news/.../agha-threatens-fast-unto-death/55300.ht... (Obviously wrong, as the ... indicates missing parts)

I added it to some references, but they still didn't work.

If you don't fix these, you are creating unnecessary work for other editors. It should simply be a case of going to a source, selecting the entire URL (CTRL+A in Windows) copying it (CTRL+C), and then pasting it (CTRL+V), in the right place.

Please don't put [ ] around them, as they then appear as "1^ a b [2] " or similar in the references section, if you aren't going to add a title, which I believe is the minimum you should provide. i.e. [url title] then "title" will appear as a blue link to the website at the URL. I think a 'wp:Bare URL' is better in this case.

Example

With brackets, your 'way': <ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ]</ref>^[1]
Bare URL: <ref>https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ</ref> ^[2]
With brackets, and title: [https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ Pratiyogita Darpan]^[3]
'Proper' citation using cite template: <ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ|title=Pratiyogita Darpan|work=google.co.in|accessdate=18 September 2015}}</ref>^[4]

which I believe was done by another editor, though even more information, like editor, publisher, issue, page number etc, would be better.

5. Like this: <ref>{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ |work=[[Pratiyogita Darpan]] |title=Kashmir Honours 84 Year Old Teacher |via=books.google.co.in |accessdate=18 September 2015 |date=November 2006| volume=1| number=5 |page=738 |editor=Mahendra Jain}}</ref>^[5]

And this is how they will appear:

References

^ [1]
^ https://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ
^ Pratiyogita Darpan
^ "Pratiyogita Darpan". google.co.in. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
^ Mahendra Jain, ed. (November 2006). "Kashmir Honours 84 Year Old Teacher". Pratiyogita Darpan. 1 (5): 738. Retrieved 18 September 2015 – via books.google.co.in.

Please don't put all the citations at the end of the paragraph. The citation to the source should be immediately after the text that it refers to.
See Help:referencing for more information.

On another matter text such as:

"Unintimidated by authority and power Prof Agha Ashraf Ali is widely acclaimed as a public speaker."

that you added here is regarded as WP:Peacock phrasing that is merely 'promotional' or praising, without adding to the facts of the subject and should not be used in an Encyclopedia. The only exception would be if it was a direct quote from another person, with a very reliable source, per WP:Reliable sources.

It would be a good idea for you to create your pages as a wp:Draft and get them right first, rather than correcting them while they are already 'published'. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 05:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, 13 of the 19 sources for Agha Ashraf Ali are dead. 220 of ^Borg 09:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 11:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agha Shaukat Ali

added links pointing to Kashmiri and Agha

Agha Shahid Ali

added a link pointing to Agha

Khan Bahadur Aga Syed Hussain

added a link pointing to Bahadur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agha Shaukat Ali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khan Bahadur Aga Syed Hussain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been trying to provide links for substantiating and authenticating my articles. if it wasnt upto the mark, i should have been warned first. you have blocked me indefinitely without giving a single opportunity to correct the mistakes which surely goes against the principle of natural justice and fairness. i would like to request you to reconsider and allow me to make contributions as per the wikipedia policies. i shall adhere to the same. please unblock the IP address

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sockpuppetry, not for the content of your edits. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

we are terribly sorry if our efforts to improve articles lead to sockpuppetry. we make a humble request for unblock. the same would never happen again. whatever will be uploaded will be substantiated with verified and authenticated proofs and nothing shall be upload for personal gains or for that matter serving the purpose of sockpuppetry. we regret the mistake.

Decline reason:

The fact that you are using the pronoun "we" tells me that you haven't read WP:SOCK. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The pronoun "WE" has been used in reference to the users of Ali1872. Our group has been studying Kashmiri History at length. one person cannot claim the whole contribution since the research is not done by one person but by a number of persons even though there is only one account. in order to maintain partiality "we" has been used. But there is only this single Account.It is therefore requested to unblock the account. As has been assured whatever will be uploaded will be substantiated with verified and authenticated proofs and nothing shall be uploaded for personal gains or for that matter serving the purpose of sockpuppetry.Thanku

Decline reason:

You have misunderstood policy here; you refer to the users (plural) of Ali1872. Having more than one person accessing an account is not allowed. if you are a group, each person must have separate account. This is not open to discussion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please and Please be assured only I use this account. But yes I do take information from my internees working for me. Otherwise only I have access to this account. Please unblock this account. Please .whatever will be uploaded will be substantiated with verified and authenticated proofs and nothing shall be uploaded for personal gains or for that matter serving the purpose of sockpuppetry. Please unblock this account. Please

Decline reason:

No. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

you have not addressed the reason for your block, which is sockpuppetry. Why do you have three accounts?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IP Address was earlier open. Settings have now been changed to Restricted. Only the Account Ali1872 has access. please be assured. It is a humble request that the account be unblocked. In case the IP address is again seen being operated by more than one account the accounts may be blocked once for all. Please Unblock the Account . Do not block the IP Address. .whatever will be uploaded will be substantiated with verified and authenticated proofs and nothing shall be uploaded for personal gains or for that matter serving the purpose of sockpuppetry. It is a Humble Request that it be Unblocked. i hope another chance will be considered. Request for Unblock

Decline reason:

No. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at your last two requests, I wonder if you in fact know what sockpuppetry is. It is the abuse of multiple accounts. You have at least three accounts; please tell us why? Do not add yet another unblock template here; just answer the question in your own words.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Have already made it clear this is the only account i have used. the other accounts that were being used from my IP Address, i have no idea since my IP Address was open with No restrictions. Friends had equal access to my computer. The settings have now been changed and restricted. therefore only one account that is Ali1872 shall be operational from this IP Address if unblocked. rest all your prerogative. I totally understand what Sockpuppetry is. Its Unfortunate that after repeated requests my plea is not being considered even though i have assured you of utmost sincerity in the near future with request to important articles for the contribution to Wikipedia .

notice:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Have already made it clear this is the only account i have used. the other accounts that were being used from my IP Address, i have no idea since my IP Address was open with No restrictions. Friends had equal access to my computer. The settings have now been changed and restricted. Please be assured on that.therefore only one account that is Ali1872 shall be operational from this IP Address if unblocked. rest all your prerogative. I totally understand what Sockpuppetry is. Its Unfortunate that after repeated requests my plea is not being considered even though i have assured you of utmost sincerity in the near future with request to important articles for the contribution to Wikipedia .

Decline reason:

No. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

@Anthony Bradbury: This unblock request is a mess, but I would argue that sockpuppetry is not simply "the abuse of multiple accounts" (otherwise User:The Lady Catherine de Burgh would be blocked), but rather "the use of multiple accounts to deceive or to circumvent a sanction"). When we block people simply because they are sockpuppets (as very distinct from somebody using a sockpuppet after the master received a sanction for some other disruption eg: incivility, personal attacks, POV pushing etc etc) I am not at all surprised to find them confused and upset. @Ali1872: I think your best option is to abandon this account, do something else for about 6 months, then follow the instructions in the standard offer. I would also recommend requesting an unblock via the Arbitration Committee email address, as "vanilla" admins can't do anything about checkuser blocks. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC) @Ritchie333: can you please explain further. Do i have to abandon this account for six months so that my IP Address will be unblocked . Is there any other remedy. can you be a bit more clear.[reply]

File:Agha Shaukat Ali.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agha Shaukat Ali.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my account. this being the first one. i did make more account only after this one was blocked. and had to continue because the others too were blocked and the only reason for that is my references were considered as not very much authentic. currently i had been using wikipedia as WikiDoner and had contributed pages like Agha (Hakim) Muhammad Baqir which was never contested for false authentic proof or being bogus but was approved at the first instance. I request you to give me a chance and unblock me.However i will make it up and upload the content which has authentic source and is reliable. You have already deleted pages Aga Syed Hussain and Agha Ashraf Ali. and trust me they did not lack authenticity in its entirety. 60-70% of the content in the articles have reliable sources and are worth for upload on wikipedia. My other articles that i made through my other accounts (after previous ones were blocked) are also put up for deletion. I request you to review all this. and Restore the delted articles and i may be given a chance to edit every article of mine which is supported by less authentic source. I again request you humbly to please unblock me and restore my contributions /articles and give me a chance to upload authentic and reliable sources for the articles. I understand i should have put up and continued for unblock request for this very account and should not have abused wikipedia policies by creating other accounts. please understand there was no malice on my part. My intention was always good. I request you to unblock me. and restore my contributions/ articles

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk page stalker) You were blocked in October 2015 for WP:Sock puppetry, by which time you were already using two additional accounts. The community will not support any kind of unblock unless and until you declare all the accounts you have opened, and explain why you have opened each one of them. That doesn't guarantee that we will support it, but it is the minimum requirement. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3 i had made accounts with name : Ali1872, Zehnaseeb, WikipidiaReview, and WikiDoner. These are the ones. i used 2-3 simultaneously because my edits from a single account were considered to be as promoting content with bogus information which really is untrue. you can check my articles, both deleted ones (Aga Syed Hussain and Agha Ashraf Ali ) and the ones that are supported for deletion as authentic with 60-70% authentic and reliable proofs and deserve to be on Wikipedia. Please understand that i had no malice. i agree i have abused the policies. i just want one chance to use one single account from now on with your permission and my deleted articles be restored if and only if you believe that i had no malice. otherwise i do admit i have abused the policies. and i am ready for my content and articles to be brought down and barred from contributing to wikipedia. I request once again please review it and give a chance. rest your prerogative. sorry again. best wishes to you.

In that case, your 6 months begins today. You need to stay off Wikipedia for 6 months, before you can ask for Standard Offer. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali1872 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock my account. @Kautilya3 Hello and greetings. Please let me know about my status. I was given one last chance by staying away from wikipedia for a period of 6 months. its been more than that. Please let me know can i use Wikipedia again? and contribute ? . will my articles that were uploaded be restored (only after you have verified the references ) .

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing admin

"i did make more account only after this one was blocked." This appears to be an outright lie. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ali1872/Archive where WikipidiaReview (talk · contribs) and Zehnaseeb (talk · contribs) are identified as sockpuppets created before Ali1872 was blocked. Note also that this person was deliberately violating their block using the account, WikiDonor (talk · contribs), right up until that account was blocked, less than a week ago. It's not at all clear to me that this user understands how inappropriate his or her behaviour has been. Given their history of abuse, are you sure they'll never again use a sockpuppet? Note that Ali1872 has claimed there was no malice, which could of course be true. It's... a bit hard to see, given they were aware of the sockpuppet policy and deliberately decided to violate it. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I did use those accounts simultaneously because my edits from a single account were considered to be as promoting content with bogus information which really is untrue. Please understand that i had no malice. i agree i have abused the policies. i just want one chance to use one single account from now on with your permission and my deleted articles be restored if and only if you believe that i had no malice. otherwise i do admit i have abused the policies. and i am ready for my content and articles to be brought down and barred from contributing to wikipedia. I request once again please review it and give a chance. rest your prerogative. sorry again. best wishes to you.

@Kautilya3 @Anthony Bradbury Please let me know about my status. I was given one last chance by staying away from wikipedia for a period of 6 months. its been more than that. Please let me know can i use Wikipedia again? and contribute ? . will my articles that were uploaded be restored (only after you have verified the references ) .

Proposed deletion of File:Agha Ashraf Ali.jpeg

The file File:Agha Ashraf Ali.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[2] ttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=k-gDAAAAMBAJ

[3] Pratiyogita Darpan

[4] "Pratiyogita Darpan". google.co.in. Retrieved 18 September 2015.

[5] Mahendra Jain, ed. (November 2006). "Kashmir Honours 84 Year Old Teacher". Pratiyogita Darpan. 1 (5): 738. Retrieved 18 September 2015 – via books.google.co.in.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]