User talk:Algocu

Welcome!

Hello, Algocu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- JHunterJ 14:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Timpani

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Algocu! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.tripod\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 03:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CBS labs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CBS labs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 11:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up

I took care of the vandalism on Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution, thanks for the info. Cheers, JCO312 23:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CLD logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CLD logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Reorder.ogg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Reorder.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 14:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ladi Geisler Those Were The Days.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ladi Geisler Those Were The Days.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tag corrected. algocu (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John O'Neill (musician)

I notice you are effecting some edits on this article. Way back in 2007, I intended to pursue the validity of Mr. O'Neill as the probable 'owner' of the 'Whistling Jack Smith' story - sadly I got sidetracked and did not return. However, if you have not done so already, please read Talk:John O'Neill (musician), which explains the rationale behind my thinking back then. I do not think that O'Neill (bless him) was necessarily the driving force behind "Kaiser Bill's Batman". However, as you may have noticed, at lot of this seems to be wrapped up in legend, fiction, hear'say etc. As ever, Wikipedia:Reliable sources is perhaps the answer. Cheers,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Narcissistic personality disorder

This personality disorder is unrelated to pathological liar. People with a narcissistic personality disorder do not necessarily lie. Therefore, I have reverted your edit. —Mattisse (Talk) 01:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood -- then an elaboration at Pathological liar: Diagnosis in Psychology would be useful. algocu (talk) 16:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Analog passthrough

I decided your contribution, adding to that of Radiojon, makes a valuable addition to the Coupon-eligible converter box article. I'm surprised given the remote possibility they could have shut down the CECB program, that it wasn't in the article in the first place.

Now here's hoping they didn't decide that the court case wasn't that important earlier.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was that information in the source? It looks good.

I'm not certain the "no deadline" sentence is in the right place. Being there kind of de-emphasizes the idea. It was pretty prominent before I moved it.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandb.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Township, Morris County, New Jersey and 24th / 25th District

Regarding your recent edit to Washington Township, Morris County, New Jersey, it is premature to state that it is now in the 25th Legislative District. Sure, if you voted today,you voted for representatives to the Senate and Assembly in the 25th district. But until the new legislature takes office in January 2012, you are in the 24th Legislative District. Steve Oroho is till your State Senator and Gary R. Chiusano and Alison Littell McHose still represent you in the Assembly until January. I have edited other articles to reflect that the change *will" take effect in January 2012 and will endeavor to do so for this one here. Alansohn (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to make the original update to the article and for catching my error.

File permission problem with File:Audimax.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Audimax.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to do so -- but as the file has been deleted, I cannot provide the requested information. algocu (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lockheed A-12

Regarding edits to Lockheed A-12, specifically, naming of Ray Torick as LCO of fatal test crash. While it has been suggested that the identification of Torick in the article is inappropriate because he is a "non-notable person," we respectfully disagree. First, the test pilot gave his life while on duty. Second, the Lockheed A-12/M-21 program was canceled by program manager Kelly Johnson because of the loss. Third, Torick is mentioned by name in several books about the aircraft program. All of these factors make his identity notable.

--algocu

October 2016

Hi, just looking at your history makes this edit seam out of place! Have you got one of those plugins that auto changes words enabled? Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's called the Drumpfinator. You may even have forgotten that you downloaded that. But you need to disable it if you are going to edit at Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Kylie is right -- and auto edit changed multiple entries -- not intentional at all! algocu (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Algocu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Cruz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Cruz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Cruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, adding information to talk page. Shall I update the wiki, or wait for a resolution here? Thanks. I dream of horses algocu (talk) 18:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add more information to the article. It might actually help. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Closeapple. I noticed that you made a change to an article, WABC (AM), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Closeapple (talk) 22:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Notability of Cravath re: War of Currents

The problem is the event is important to the subject but the subject is not very important to the event (as far as I can tell). The sources you are citing are about Paul Cravath, not War of Currents, so they are not third-party sources WP:V requires. A third-party sources on this topic: such as "AC/DC: The Savage Tale of the First Standards War" does not mention Paul Cravath at all. "Empires of Light" and "George Westinghouse: Gentle Genius" (which seems to copy "Empires of Light") mention Paul Cravath in passing, description pretty much limited to "Westinghouse's lawyer". Absolutely no description of there being any kind of "trial of the century". I hope that explains my edit. You could always try to find more extensive reliable sources. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough -- in part, but more specifically: (1) Cravath had a key role in the Edison v Westinghouse litigations, a fact which is duly noted in the postscript of Moore's book, where he delineates the fictional vs actual facts as he presents them. This makes him an independent (and not unreliable) source, so recommend removing this tag from Paul Drennan Cravath article. (2) RE: War of Currents, as pointed out, Cravath was part of this story, per Moore, and again, this provides a useful reference. "Trial of the century" was quote taken from deleted reference; suggest re-inserting original text, modifying "trial of" quote to read "so-called" or similar. algocu (talk) 18:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through synopsis' of "The Last Days of Night" and clips of the book, its pretty fanciful. It is not "independent", it is about Cravath, and its fictional to boot. The history presented by books on the "War of Currents" is that Westinghouse ultimately lost the patent dispute over the light bulb and had to use an inferior Sawyer-Man patent, there is not even a hint of a "Trial of the century" and what Cravath accomplished seemed to be insignificant in the overall history (there were hundreds of people involved in this "War", they may crop up in an extensive book on the topic but we can't WP:UNDUE list individuals in a short Wikipedia article). Moore's work is a fictional account where he turned real life people into "characters", so we can not really even use it as a source on what was important in Cravath's life history. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One problem with your assessment: a simple synopsis does not reveal the factual basis of both the novel and my argument: author Moore devotes a heavily-referenced appendix in his book to delineate fact from fiction. My claims stand: the statements in my entry are documented facts, not fiction. algocu (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some common sense here, novels are not considered relivable sources in Wikipedia (see WP:RS on what are). The book's appendix can be read at Google Books and, nah, it ain't history. The source in question, Graham Moore, is not a historian, he writes screenplays and novelizations of screenplays. He is not citing historical fact in his footnotes as much as he is citing his own non-historan take on history. He notes many times he is compressing and combining events to make a fictional narative and that Paul Cravath's roll in key events were made up (see pages 365-366 for example). Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Eimac 3CX15000A7 vacuum tube.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eimac 3CX15000A7 vacuum tube.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Algocu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seven Santini Brothers has been accepted

Seven Santini Brothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Donald Trump without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muboshgu -- those were not my edits -- your mistake, or has someone stolen my ID? algocu (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muboshgu -- Seems edits were made by accident -- I didn't intend them at all -- thanks for the head's up. algocu (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I received a note to come here, but I had nothing to do with this. Bearian (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi. I have blocked your account indefinitely as you reported it being compromised to ANI. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which edits were not made by you? —DoRD (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC) If it's the removal of content from Talk:Donald Trump, perhaps you removed it by mistake? —DoRD (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not make the edits at Talk:Donald Trump:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_Trump&oldid=829313871

This was reverted by User:Muboshgu in the subsequent revision:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_Trump&oldid=829314003

algocu (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that you didn't change that material accidentally, perhaps without even realizing it? I have found no evidence that your account has been compromised, unless someone else accessed your device without your knowledge. —DoRD (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I did not realize it, so I can't say if it was accidentally deleted. All of my devices are in my possession. So, how do I get back in? algocu (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked your account. —DoRD (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Case closed. algocu (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious and I took a look. The edit restored discussions that had been archived as well as blanking new discussions. It looks like you either clicked edit while viewing an old version from the page history, or maybe you clicked edit somewhere around Feb 26 and left the browser open for more than a week before saving. The latter option should have warned you of an edit conflict. Either way it looks a like an accident rather than someone else compromising the account. Alsee (talk) 09:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Followup: I have pinned down the exact edit. Algocu see this diff. You were attempting to reply to Scjessey post from 17:33, 23 February 2018 and you saved your edit 21:58, 7 March 2018. The edit wiped out all new posts between those dates, as well as restoring all discussions archived between those dates.

Note that when your edit was reverted, your response to Scjessey was also removed. I was going to suggest that you re-post your comment on the talk page, however that discussion has already been archived. The ping in your reply did not work; pings do not trigger when a diff hits multiple sections. I'll ping Scjessey so they can at least see your reply in the diff-link above. Alsee (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Alsee -- algocu (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Algocu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Algocu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Path loss

An article that you have been involved in editing—Path loss—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:NextRadio’s new Live Guide.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Proton Electronic

Hello Algocu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Proton Electronic for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Proton Electronic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proton Electronic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton Electronic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dps04 (talk) 18:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão (SET)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão (SET) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://set.org.br/set/?lang=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spicy (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão (SET) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão (SET), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 18:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Algocu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 10:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SMPTE color bars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EIA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão

Hello, Algocu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão

Hello, Algocu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sociedade Brasileira De Engenharia De Televisão".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost in Space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burroughs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]