User talk:Alexwhite116

Welcome!

Hello, Alexwhite116, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Independent (politician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] that he was the true [[dance]] champion; Stalin being nothing but an [[Kim Il Sung|impostor]] (though not as much as [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Lenoid_Brezhnev/| Leonid Brezhnev]. To do

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm APerson. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Independent (politician) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. APerson (talk!) 18:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cruelty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cruelty was changed by Alexwhite116 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950311 on 2014-05-26T20:19:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kevintampa5. Your recent edit to the page Imran_Khan appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 05:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rayan Abdelbaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rayan Abdelbaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 06:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Neil deGrasse Tyson with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Aaboubieh. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Alexwhite116 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deeply apologise for my actions earlier this year. I understand it is difficult to trust that I wish to actually contribute now to Wikipedia but I honestly do. The reasoning behind this being because I was researching for school the other day and my teacher came up with the usual 'Don't trust Wikipedia'. I, however, told her that we should certainly trust Wikipedia as long as we check the references. I realised then how much damage my vandalism previously could have caused; if someone had carelessly copied information down I could well have made life very difficult for them (or even have deprived them of information entirely). In addition, the fact that I supported Wikipedia made me realise that my own vandalism was silly and childish and I deeply regret what I did before. I understand this sounds like a bit of a sob story and completely understand if you feel that I cannot be trusted. If not, I will likely wait some time and make another request to be unblocked. I am very sorry for the inconvenience. Thank you for reading. Alexwhite116 (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Following discussion with the blocking admin, I've decided to give you a second chance. PhilKnight (talk) 12:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]