User talk:AlexanderVolkov123

Undiscloded paid editing

Hello AlexanderVolkov123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

The links, you inserted are totally faking the whole article. Please refrain from doing that again, or you will be blocked.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AlexanderVolkov123. The template

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:

AlexanderVolkov123, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by InsertName for their contributions to Wikipedia.

. 77.52.177.127 (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

non-neutral biased edits

Last warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. 77.52.13.235 (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AlexanderVolkov123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. El_C 18:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El_C there is no conflict of interest on my part. It is very strange to me that you are not suspicious of those who edit from anonymous IP addresses. There are also threats coming from them to the discussion page. Why don't you deal with it? AlexanderVolkov123 (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It might be strange to you, but I am "not suspicious of those who edit from anonymous IP addresses" by default. If you have something you'd like me to review — link the pertinent WP:DIFFs. El_C 14:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El_C yes, I would like you to pay attention. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JeILoenita here I have written in detail. AlexanderVolkov123 (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "detail." My sense is that that SPI is not gonna go anywhere because you have zero WP:DIFFs. Maybe I'm wrong and it'll be intuitive enough to a patrolling admin/CU, but I'd wager against that (then again I'm not an SPI regular so who really knows?). El_C 05:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El_C yes, I’m specifically asking for details of the situation. As there is commercial promotion of the persona. There was a story with Forbes Georgia recently. An article was published there about Tamaz Somkhishvili and a few days later the article was removed. The story was written in an investigation [1]. And so what happens on Wikipedia is very much like a bot farm. AlexanderVolkov123 (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh... I can't read that and I'm not clear on what what happens on Wikipedia is very much like a bot farm means exactly — but good luck with all of that. Hope it works out. El_C 10:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hennadiy Gufman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hennadiy Gufman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hennadiy Gufman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Edit.pdf (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kharkivska Square moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kharkivska Square, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gennady Gufman

It is completely inappropriate to recreate Hennadiy Gufman as Gennady Gufman after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hennadiy Gufman determined the subject doe snot meet the inclusion criteria for an article on Wikipedia. If you believe the deletion process was not followed properly, you can speak to the deleting administrator (User:Star Mississippi), but I will note that you did not participate in the deletion discussion, and the consensus was clearly to delete the article. If you have new sources that establish notability, you can create a draft and use articles for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 12:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kharkivska Square

The article was moved to User talk:AlexanderVolkov123/Kharkivska Square by NortonAngo (talk · contribs) without leaving you a notice. I have moved the article back into mainspace, where you can find it at Kharkivska Square. I have redirected Draft:Kharkivska Square to Kharkivska Square. Let me know, if I can help you with anything. Sam Sailor 21:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Apel8 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Apel8, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]