User talk:AlexBalder01

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of YouTubers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. The mass addition of pointy Islamic terrorism categories not actually supported by the articles in question is not an improvement. Please desist. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These people were killed by islamist terrorists, I added the Victims of Islamic terrorism category to the category of these people, and you have taken back my contribution and are threatening to block me. Moreover, you claim that I violated Wikipedia's original research policy. AlexBalder01 (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Roundish. I noticed that you recently removed content from Index of Windows games (Y) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Roundish ⋆t c) 13:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Index of Windows games (Z), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Roundish ⋆t c) 13:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These changes were removing nonnotable entries from these lists, and I support them. They certainly do not deserve escalating warning templates. AlexBalder01, please fill in the edit summary field when you make such edits in the future - explaining what you are doing there should guard against future misunderstandings. MrOllie (talk) 14:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the insignificant entries. I'll write the description on my next change. AlexBalder01 (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same, please don't add unsourced material or add categories which are not supported. Egeymi (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i added the news source. AlexBalder01 (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

order of categories and linking of regular words/terms

Please do not change the order of categories in any article because there is no specified order for them. So just repect the established order. Secondly, please don't link regular terms. Sorry, but I will report you if you continue your edits, Egeymi (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

take back your report, okay, I won't edit it. AlexBalder01 (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to arrange the category in alphabetical order, I didn't do any vandalism. AlexBalder01 (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please add edit summaries and explain why you remove or add categories Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Did you gather support for your move at Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)? Semsûrî (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexBalder01: Further to the above message:

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In moving the Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) article to PKK–Turkish conflict (1978–present) and back several times, you have disassociated the article from its talk page, which now sits at Talk:PKK–Republic of Turkey conflict (1978–present). This now requires an administrator to repair the issue. Next time, before moving a page, please request a single page move, and reach a consensus with other editors on what the target name of the page should be, before attempting to move it, once. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The Night Watch (talk) 22:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 06:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

... And you've continued your unexplained and disruptive category-fiddling, like in this edit. Your editing patternis highly suspicious. Your attempt to force Category:Fugitives to be a Non-diffusing subcategory by fiat is highly disruptive. You are not welcome here. Graham87 06:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, once people die, it doesn't erase the fact that they were fugitives. Graham87 06:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing more of your edits, I notice that you;'ve been subverting deletion proceesses at Alaettin Çakıcı, Category:Turkish Nationalist writers, etc. ... there is absolutely no reason to trust you ever again. Graham87 08:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're a sockpuppet of CarlostheJackal01 ... Graham87 17:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:CarlostheJackal01 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CarlostheJackal01. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]