User talk:Alec Smithson

Welcome!

Hello, Alec Smithson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Oktagon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Seattle (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oktagon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oktagon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Seattle (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lordship of Nanteuil

Alec, is Lordship of Nanteuil a translation from another Wikipedia? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, not exactly a little bit yes from Signoria de Nanteuil only and I checked the sources, why is no good to translate? I have to change? --Alec Smithson (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is a draft I want correct and develop step by step Lordship and history of Nanteuil.

Translating is just fine. All we ask is that you use the template Template:translated on the talk page so that future editors know that. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if is correct to use the template translated because is not exactly the same text. Thanks to you. Best R.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lordship of Nanteuil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crusader. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you --Alec Smithson (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of House of Nyerere

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as House of Nyerere, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yopie (talk) 23:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Burrito Nyerere

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Burrito Nyerere, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yopie (talk) 23:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paolo Biotti

Hi, I'm Jorm. Alec Smithson, thanks for creating Paolo Biotti!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You need to provide references for the claims made on Paolo Biotti. Additionally, you should ensure that the article explains exactly why this individual is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jorm (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lierna page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Principality of Sperlinga

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Alec Smithson, thanks for creating Principality of Sperlinga!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Torre Archirafi

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Alec Smithson, thanks for creating Torre Archirafi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. ,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sulfurboy great, I will do. --Alec Smithson (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorirsation

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! I checked your latest additions to Wikipedia and I would linke to thank you for your contributions. Here is an advice: Please check the categories you add to the pages.

Categories ending with "...stubs" should not be added dirctly to the pages
Categories starting with "Lists of..." should not be added directly to pages about persons
Avoid adding the same caegory twice
Avoid adding a category when a more specific exists
Try adding categories as specific as possible avoiding overlapping

Hers are some examples of categories you added and I removed: [1], [2], [3]. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob Marchese

The article Bob Marchese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor with questionable notability and no reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luciano Caramel

The article Luciano Caramel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 10:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Natoli

added links pointing to Estrées and Schomberg

Lordship of Nanteuil

added links pointing to Estrées and Schomberg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Nyerere Society

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kevin Nyerere Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foundation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lista de Antigos Mestres (Old Masters) italianos listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lista de Antigos Mestres (Old Masters) italianos. Since you had some involvement with the Lista de Antigos Mestres (Old Masters) italianos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oktagon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pavel Zhuravlev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lordship of Nanteuil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valois. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mary?

I reverted your inclusion of Mary (mother of Jesus) in Category:House of Natoli, figuring that she predated that house by over 800 years. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Orioles

added links pointing to Senators and Patti

Domenico Ligresti

added a link pointing to Charles V

Giovan Battista di Crollalanza

added a link pointing to Carpi

House of Levis

added a link pointing to Gensac

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MACAM Museum

Hello Alec Smithson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MACAM Museum for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Jullien de Courcelles page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlo Bazzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlo Bazzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlo Bazzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Jullien de Courcelles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Or. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Fight1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Fight1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Achille D'Orsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfonso of Aragon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Carlo Bazzi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Competence is required

To edit Wikipedia, competence is required. You need to speak and understand the language of the wikipedia you are editing. That page says:

If someone's native language is not English and they can't communicate in English well—including discussing things with other editors—consider trying to encourage them to edit a Wikipedia in their own language. Those other-language Wikipedias need help from editors, too.

I strongly encourage you to leave this wikipedia alone, and edit some other. Yes, I know you are blocked on it.wp, and I now fully understand why.

You also need to understand how Wikipedia articles are built and the requirements for notability, WP:verifiability and WP:neutrality (among others); and you need to pay attention to advice received from other editors. You demonstrate no ability to do any of this. You continue to add unreferenced content though you have been asked many times not to; much of it is completely incomprehensible, as your grasp of English seems to be very poor (se preferisci, ti posso spiegare tutto questo anche in italiano, ma tanto non ti frega nulla, vero?). Your understanding of our policies and practices is very limited, and your interest in improving it seems negligible. If I see any further incompetent editing on your part I intend to ask for your editing privileges here to be limited or terminated. If I do so, I will also ask for them to be limited or terminated on the other wikipedias you have spammed with your abominable translations of Carlo Bazzi. Oh, and that is a copyright infraction too – if you translate content from here to another wp, you must provide attribution of the source. I don't know what you think you are doing here, but you are definitely not helping to build an encyclopaedia at the moment. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the way I write I feel deeply offensive unjustifiably. It is false that I do not give a damn of your statements, I believe to contribute news of interest and as you can see there are always sources. The reasons for the block on wiki Italy is down to what you believe, but in a discussion with an arrogant editor who wrote news without logic and sense that I objected. You're right that I have to improve on English but this can also happen with a collaboration since errors are often solved in a few words. Carlo Bazzi tried more news and I always providing complete exegesis of the sources, the note of request asked to complete it. Best Regards --Alec Smithson (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alec, you do not have good enough English to effectively edit English Wikipedia. It is unfortunate that this offends you, but it is reality. My suggestion is that you post on the talk pages with suggested sources and ideas. Let people who are more fluent do the actual article work. Montanabw ^(talk) 02:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. FactStraight (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will work about. --Alec Smithson (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Brera Academy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pinacoteca di Brera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But I provided the reliable sources! for these integrations. I will improve.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 14:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Brera Academy while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Antonio Bernocchi while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An apology

A few days ago I responded here to a question from you. The way I answered you was well below the standard of courtesy that I require of myself, and that I hope to meet with in other editors. I was rude, I should not have been, and I am sorry for that. I have placed below an invitation to the Teahouse. Please give that a try – you may find people there who can help you more than I have been able to.

Please permit me to give you three small pieces of advice:

Be careful with accusations of vandalism; those can sometimes be considered personal attacks, and have unpleasant consequences
Log in to your account to edit; editing from an IP address can give an impression of misusing multiple accounts (which can also have unpleasant consequences)
Try reading some articles in Treccani; do they talk about "iconic" chairs, "the most important" painter, "one of the most famous patrons"? No they do not; they are written in serious academic language (usually!). That is the same "encyclopaedic" style of writing we want here – plain, clear, dispassionate and, above all, accurate. Who is Andrea Bernocchi, mentioned without explanation here?

Please try the Teahouse! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I read only now. I thank you for what you write, and you have admitted that you were rude and impolite, apology accepted.

I don't understand these: " Be careful with accusations of vandalism; those can sometimes be considered personal attacks, and have unpleasant consequences" If you complete erase a text without reason, complelty next my long work, sorry but I think that these is a vandalism? did you agree?

Treccani is an encyclopedia that has had a great Italian authorities but the majority of the texts were written over 50 years ago, when the writing was really wrong like manner, I invite you to investigate Treccani.

If it is true that a designer has been one of the most important in Italy, and is well known, I think that even in an encyclopedia is not a eulogy but an important element to the player and if that shared and reliable. Castiglioni on what is certain.

Bernocchi was the most important philanthropist of Italy, founded the museum of the three-year (see photos of license plates and the whole building is engraved with his name). Three years is the most important museum of Italian design today. Bernocchi has finziato riscotruzione the Brera and Milan's La Scala and more. The sources are all there. And very famous. You'll have to trust what I write otherwise documented at least better, I always carry literature and sources sometimes if I can also link to pages readable online.

Read: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Bernocchi These is the official page of italian Government Senate http://notes9.senato.it/web/senregno.NSF/0e10afcd14636769c1257134004b5171/0a92c123e7ef95894125646f0058dfb0?OpenDocument With pleasure boar in TeaHouse, thanks --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello! Alec Smithson, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please give this a try! Perhaps you will find somebody there who can help you to understand what it is we are trying to do here, and what kind of content is welcome in this project. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you nice invitation.

I will do it. --Alec Smithson (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stratigoto‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 19:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?? But I remove because I resolved the problems! the templeate asked categories and I insert category so I removed! Check it!!!

--Alec Smithson (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did add categories, but the article is still an orphan and a dead end, meaning nothing links to it and it doesn't link to anything else. Those are the issues that need to be addressed. ~~Also, the article should have some sources to back up its claims and make it verifiable~~. clpo13_(talk) 19:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

???? 1. before was not indicated orphan page in the template that I removed. 2. Fake also these, the page is not orphan page. Check.

3. i don't understand the soruces in bibliogaphy is verifiable. Thanks. P.S. You can erase the templates now, I did yest. --Alec Smithson (talk) 19:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from Italian Wikipedia: attribution is REQUIRED

Alec Smithson, as I wrote here earlier today, "if you translate an article from it.wp as you appear to have tried to do here, you must place a {{translated}} templated on the talk page to provide attribution for the work done by the Italian editors who wrote that content". Is that completely clear? Please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia projects. Please now add proper attribution to all articles you have copied content from into this project. Please be aware that copying from other Wikimedia projects without providing attribution is a copyright violation and can lead to you being blocked from editing. Please take this as a final warning. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Now please rebuild the page Lierna Chair of Castiglioni like before. Thank you. --Alec Smithson (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from Italian Wikipedia: attribution is REQUIRED

Much of Antonio Bernocchi is copied from the Italian Wikipedia article, but you have not provided attribution. Do you understand that this is an obligation? And that you may be blocked from editing if you do not do it? Please confirm here that you have understood this requirement. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but your message was given after the building of Antonio Bernocchi. However, the text is different not the same. Satis est --Alec Smithson (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Repet the text of Antonio Bernocchi is not the same of the italian version. Read and see easy. --Alec Smithson (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Museo Giannino Castiglioni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Museo Giannino Castiglioni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museo Giannino Castiglioni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo Bazzi/Cariplo

Hi, I just undid this edit. There's non evidence that works of Bazzi are in Cariplo Foundation art collection. Indeed, it seems the opposite. --Carlomartini86^{(Knock-Knock)} 12:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bianco di Lierna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bianco di Lierna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianco di Lierna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Lierna (chair). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user Justlettersandnumbers, specializing in goats, continued repeatedly has removed, without limitation but not limited to Lierna Chair bibliography correct and specified in the notes present as well as a model and policy of wikipedia, it did so without reason, without reporting any news or prodromal question.

Please analyze the ultimate elimination of Bibliography who admitted to having done. Check where was the mistake or inaccuracy of the Bibliography Lierna Chair cancelled? with nothing to report, ask, inform me, justify? But I can continue. Invitation to contain on every front that user. I'd rather not interact in any way as a result with this user, I do not think he's doing the intetesse texts produced. --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check Bibliography last eliminated on Lierna Chair in detail and you will see that what I say is true that the references risponderva what is to be reported in the policy wikipedia. thank you.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Alec Smithson, but I can't understand what you are trying to say. As I have repeatedly told you, you do not have the necessary WP:COMPETENCY to edit this Wikipedia. If you want to try to explain in Italian what you mean, I will translate it for you. But please be careful not to make any more inappropriate accusations of vandalism, and try to assume good faith. If you want someone else to look at this page, put a {{help me}} tag on it, with a clearly-worded explanation of what you think is wrong. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're erasing without reason my writings, continuing for months in every way, do not justify what you do never. How is it that for months I have one and only problem with you and no one else? how it is the rudeness was always and only yours and never with other users?.

Chair Lierna has had a long work of literature search, on wikipedia you should always report the texts in the bibliography present in the notes, and you can not say anything and you erase all!! And this is unacceptable. And then ask to canceled my texts Bianco di Lierna. Maybe if you're in good faith is the case that you check better what you do. Also now you ask to remove wine Bianco Lierna, a wine that is produced as described in references from ancient Rome!!! But I ask yiy what skills and know how do you have to evaluate the high desing Italian (i remember you that you don't know who is ACHILLE CASTIGLIONI!) or Italian wines when you only ever write about goats ?! If you want to collaborate correct grammar and form of my script, but not afford to clear and erase more suddenly without reason nothing otherwise I reserve any action. Best Regards --Alec Smithson (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IS very clear and transparent what is wrong and what I have written, even in good faith it is trivial and guessed without written. Solve the problem or I reserve any action, against your behavior, rudness and persecution.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "reserve any action"? clpo13_(talk) 05:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marco Ghibaudo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Alessandro Riguccini. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are not notables athlete verify! --Alec Smithson (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alec, if you want to write to someone, you have to do it in his talk page. If you do it here you have to use Template:Reply to. --Carlomartini86^{(Knock-Knock)} 07:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Alec Smithson (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

good morning

I need you help urgently, i develop for long year and long research the page Lierna, an amazing village. The page was completly destroy and ereased without a real reason. All the content was true and I used a lot of references and bibliography. Please did you can check the history of LIERNA page? and check these? and said something against these vandalism? Thank you, --Alec Smithson (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Having read over what was removed, the content was very promotional and I am not surprised that it was reverted. When editing Wikipedia it is important to maintain a neutral point of view. In other words, phrases like "its precious grapes characteristics" and "a place of relaxation and strong privacy" should be avoided. Wikipedia is not a promotional space, it's an encyclopedia. You are welcome to re-add some of the content, but avoid WEASEL words and FLOWERY language. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As an additional note, please do not spam the talk pages of multiple editors without reason, this is called Canvassing and is disruptive. Primefac (talk) 15:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Филиппинцы, Франческо

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Филиппинцы, Франческо to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. IsraphelMac (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of works by Giambattista Pittoni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Roch, Penitent Magdalene and Finding of Moses. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Lierna Castle

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lierna Castle, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castello_di_Lierna, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lierna Castle and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Lierna Castle, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lierna Castle. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Lierna Castle with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Lierna Castle saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have told you again and again (see above) that attribution is required when translating from a Wikipedia in another language. You have always chosen to ignore that advice. Your abominable Google-translation of Lierna Castle from it:Castello di Lierna is unattributed, and is thus a copyright violation. I have blanked it and listed it as such. You should not edit the blanked content until the matter is resolved; you may not remove the template. As several editors have told you, you do not have the necessary WP:COMPETENCE to edit this Wikipedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lierna Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Random message

You left this message on my user page which I didn't understand and have removed. Talk pages are the place to communicate with other editors not user pages. If you need some help why not try the teahouse where you may find a sympathetic editor. Jodosma (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Lierna Castle. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Lierna Castle/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gino Polli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gino Polli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino Polli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too many categories

You are adding far too many categories to your articles. Only the most detailed level should be added - so if he is an "Italian sculptor" don't also add "Italian artist". Don't add "Italian art" etc to ANY biographies. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Thank you. --Alec Smithson (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antonino Natoli (insurance man) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonino Natoli (insurance man) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonino Natoli (insurance man) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo Bazzi/Cariplo (2)

Come on, Alec, you knew this is not true. --Carlomartini86^{(Knock-Knock)} 20:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Castle of Sperlinga, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are 8 line writing and 10 sources and yoy insert hoaxes ?! did you think is right?!

Look House of Orioles. --Alec Smithson (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxing

Alec Smithson, it appears that not all that you write in Wikipedia is true. Would you like to tell us exactly what source states that the supporters of the arms of Giovanni Natoli were:

Dexter a lion rampant gardant Or crowned with the coronet of the Prince of Sperlinga, sinister a griffin winged and unguled Or, gorged with a coronet Or composed of crosses patée and fleurs de lis a chain affixed thereto passing between the forelegs and reflexed over the back also Or

and whether you do not find it just a touch curious that the supporters of the arms of Diana, Princess of Wales were, according to this test-case page,

Dexter a lion rampant gardant Or crowned with the coronet of the Prince of Wales, sinister a griffin winged and unguled Or, gorged with a coronet Or composed of crosses patée and fleurs de lis a chain affixed thereto passing between the forelegs and reflexed over the back also Or?

I suggest that the chances that Natoli had the same supporters as Lady Diana during her marriage to Charles (that on the left from her husband's coat of arms, that on the right from her father's) are disappearingly small. It appears that you are, for whatever reason, trying to make fools of us.

Furthermore, if you copy text within Wikipedia, you must, as you have repeatedly been told, provide attribution. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Diana and Prince Charles (Sic!)

But let me satisfied that you saw that the coat of arms is fair, you can not see that is the exact description of the emblem? without anything c'entrino Lady Diana and Prince Charles that you made up you?

Do not you see that the description is harmonized with the graphics of the emblem?

the way you ask is offensive, like you normally do with me. Everything written is true. And sources on the description of the emblem numerous. I not only nothing Dina and Prince Charles, that have nothing to do. when there is something obvious and everyone knows that the powers are useless.

disappearingly? disappearing ??!! I repeat are who sees everything is clean clean and I never play. You're just like always offensive and attack me constantly in every way with foolhardy unjust accusations.check that it is always and only him to continue attacks persecutors always rude to me and against me.

Now you MUST explain what does Lady Diana ?! and what enters the media with a coat of arms Blasonico? heraldry but you know her? the media is not worth anything if not for beauty except in rare cases. What does it has to do with it? Recurring and rampant lions are in many European coats of arms millennial. Also the emblem of the Prince Natoli is more ancient than English.

These is a translation the original in italian (not in latin) is: Il fusato è d’azzurro, alla torre d’argento merlata alla ghibellina, fondata verso il fianco destro dello scudo sopra uno scoglio uscente da unmare in tempesta nella punta il tutto al naturale; al leone d’argento coronato dello stesso fermo sullo scoglio e rampante a sinistra della torre affrontata, battuto dal mare agitato d’argento, fluttuoso di nero uscente dalla punta The site of The Castle of Sperlinga, about the Prince Giovanni Natoli http://www.castellodisperlinga.it/subpagina.php?idmenu=1&&idsubmenu=6 In New York Pubblic ANNUARIO DELLA NOBILTA ITALIANA ANNO XII, 1889 https://books.google.it/books?id=kLgTAAAAYAAJ&q=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento+merlata+alla+ghibellina&dq=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento+merlata+alla+ghibellina&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKqeap7tHJAhXk6HIKHX5yAbMQ6AEIITAB

But you can also see online IN LEOM Heraldic : http://www.leonemarinato.it/ (from Spreti 4°) In Enciclopedia storico-nobiliare italiana: famiglie nobili e titolate viventi riconosciute dal R. g̊overno d'Italia compresi: città, comunità, mense vescovili, abazie, parrocchie ed enti nobili e titolati riconosciuti, Volume 4 BY Vittorio Spreti. https://books.google.it/books?id=AygbAAAAYAAJ&q=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento+merlata+alla+ghibellina&dq=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento+merlata+alla+ghibellina&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKqeap7tHJAhXk6HIKHX5yAbMQ6AEIHDAA • Vittorio Spreti, Enciclopedia storico-nobiliare italiana: famiglie nobili e titolate viventi riconosciute dal R. Gverno d'Italia, Vol. 4, pgg 788 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Spreti In • Is write about in Giuseppe GALLUPPI, Nobiliario della città di Messina, Naples, 1977, page 132 • Antonino Mango di Casalgerardo, Nani, Nelson, Nobiliario di Sicilia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonino_Mango_di_Casalgerardo and https://books.google.it/books?id=4YwZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA646&dq=rampante+torre+d%E2%80%99argento+merlata+alla+ghibellina&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiR-fCE7tHJAhWGjnIKHcUBBWcQ6AEIHjAA and http://www.famiglia-nobile.com/links.asp?CatId=1006 and https://books.google.it/books?id=cnJJAQAAIAAJ&q=natoli+stemma++leone+rampante&dq=natoli+stemma++leone+rampante&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj54_Kg6NHJAhXH4w4KHTTRA6MQ6AEIHDAA in Annuario della nobiltà italiana https://books.google.it/books?id=H48ZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA859&dq=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZkPSF79HJAhWFhSwKHW3yCnoQ6AEIHDAA in page 97 of Il Bartolomeo Borghesi https://books.google.it/books?id=63HkAEwivE4C&pg=PA97&dq=Natoli+rampante+torre+d%27argento&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZkPSF79HJAhWFhSwKHW3yCnoQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=Natoli%20rampante%20torre%20d'argento&f=false

--Alec Smithson (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC±)

Alec Smithson, please read what I wrote above. With this edit you added to the page Giovanni Natoli this text: "Dexter a lion rampant gardant Or crowned with the coronet of the Prince of Sperlinga, sinister a griffin winged and unguled Or, gorged with a coronet Or composed of crosses patée and fleurs de lis a chain affixed thereto passing between the forelegs and reflexed over the back also Or" (please don't bother to protest that that was added by an IP, not by you). That text is copied from our article on Diana, Princess of Wales or from Template:Infobox COA wide/testcases, with the one difference that you have replaced the word "Wales" in the original with the word "Sperlinga". This raises two problems:

You are adding text to Wikipedia that is demonstrably false; that is a description of the arms of Diana, Princess of Wales, not of Giovanni Natoli
You have again copied text within Wikipedia without providing attribution

A further problem is that your translation from the Annuario della nobiltà italiana of 1889, which is presumably in the public domain, is not attributed. As I have told you many times on this page, attribution is REQUIRED. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of House of Orioles

The article House of Orioles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Noticeably suggesive of being a joke article as none of the listed links ever mention this especially the one URL and my searches instantly found nothing better at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 19:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I also had to question this article's accuracy as my searches found nothing better and the one URL link listed says "page not available". If this is accurate, it would help if you added better sources especially URLs which are quicker and easier to confirm. SwisterTwister talk 19:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is a really and important page. Is full of evidence and sources. Maybe is wrong 1 links that is possibile to corrects. A link errors is possibile or the links change some times you don't have to think that is wrong.

https://books.google.it/books?id=ZY0aAAAAYAAJ&q=principi+orioles&dq=principi+orioles&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0s4SbitLJAhUDlA8KHa-TD3AQ6AEIPjAI

http://www.famiglia-nobile.com/links.asp?CatId=1036

I checked the links: working http://www.archive.org/stream/ilblasoneinsicil00pali/ilblasoneinsicil00pali_djvu.txt

Where is the link that don't worl or page not available? --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the link dosen't work? why? because where was no a space bar next the URL Check

Now is correct and you can check here the offical page of THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT REGION OF ITALY Sicily

http://www.regione.sicilia.it/beniculturali/bibliotecacentrale/mango/oneto.htm

Government official site of Regione Sicily of the Beni Culturali italian Ministery http://www.regione.sicilia.it/

Scroll Down you have Orioles. Do you think is a good think to said is a joke? or to ask to erase a page for an error od a bar space near the URL? jumping conclusion.

Is not a good approach to investigate the truth. --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emilio Polli

Dear "Alec", why you lie in the article Emilio Polli? You added categories "Olympic medalists in swimming" and "Olympic medalists in water polo", but he newer won olympic medal. You added category "International Swimming Hall of Fame inductees", but was not honoree ([4])And you say, that he was European Aquatics Championships medalists in swimming, but he was not. Why you lie in the article?--Yopie (talk) 21:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

do not you think that he exaggerated in calling me a liar? at no point in the text it is written that he won Olympic medals where? as I have not found category participant in the Olympics I was wrong to put the category.

It seems an easy mistake to occur because the text properly report what I say. You'd be right if it were written in the text that won Olympic medals do not you think? Managing categories is very complicated. In no way are I am a liar and not in any way about I can ve your injuries.

There is no a the category Olympic or participant at the Olympics. Where I wrote in the text these?!! only in the category.

and YES he was in the hall of fame, these online version are not complete. --Alec Smithson (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yopie why your erase the correct category and you vandalism with the wrong category? * List of Italian records in swimmin --Alec Smithson (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Olympic swimmers of Italy]] Any other questions? --Yopie (talk) 23:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

well done, find it enter. It was a mistake not a lie. Let me I would expect your apology.

Any anwer ?List of Italian records in swimmin --Alec Smithson (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dont understand [5], because no such category was corrupted. By the way, as boy I was taught, that nobles shall not lie and liars are losing honour. --Yopie (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yopie

a) check about your work https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emilio_Polli&diff=694647850&oldid=694647800 b) exactly so good in fact I never lie. c) Are doubly offended because a lie like that would well short legs and very easy to check medalist worldwide, no?, and was not intended, check omnia munda mundis. d) I expect your apology Best Regards --Alec Smithson (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no, instead of excuses I ask you to fix a problem of false accusation of copyright that ruin the page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lierna_Castle --Alec Smithson (talk) 00:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxing #2

In the article you wrote on Gino Polli, you ascribed to him the Order of Vittorio Veneto, even though, as you were later told here, "Polli died 42 years before the founding of the Order of Vittorio Veneto. the statute establishing the Order did not provide for posthumous awards". I note that you have not since supported your claim with any reliable source, nor attempted to have that medal restored to the article. Do you understand that it appears that you may be attempting intentionally to deceive other editors and the readers of Wikipedia?

You also attributed to him the Croce di Guerra al Valor Militare, which was instituted in 1922, after the end of the First World War, and can be awarded only in time of war ("La croce di guerra al valor militare non si conferisce altro che in tempo di guerra" – you do understand Italian, right?). I asked you here "… in what war did Polli receive that medal, and what is your source for this claim?" I note that you have not troubled to reply. Again, by not doing so, you make it appear that you may have intentionally added false information to that page (for what reason I cannot begin to imagine). To avoid this suspicion, please cite the reliable sources which support this claim. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've surprised when you ask a thing not only polite but also right, you've made a good point. All the People involved in Battle of Vittorio Veneto had to become knight of the Order of Vittorio Veneto. But Gino Polli yes died before these law, and I studied recently this week that the official law documents details that said that is not postumus awards, so really he was not Knight of the Order of Vittorio Veneto, these is wrong. We need to erase these award. he was entitled to the medal, I had not found that the statute did not delivered posthumously and have occurred recently.

then I correct. --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I checked now, I correct these in past! is not in the dept. Honors and awards is NOT ascribed to him the Order of Vittorio Veneto, where you see?!?! --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not to say that I have intentionally put false news because then I consider DEFAMATION! ... always add a piece to your offensive writings. Thank you. And more than legitimate that I checked only after the Official Gazette with the law that takes away the right posthumously. However I REPEAT do not understand where you saw this because I had already corrected itself. --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC) "Alec Smithson, do you agree that with this edit 2. Point: Croce al merito di guerra is not the same medal that you said, there 2 different medals of Valore di Guerra. These medal is NOT instituted in 1922 ! These is a different medal called " Croce al Merito di Guerra " and was instituted on 19 January 1918 at the end of World War I. I checked and these 3 medals are ok. It was released to the military and militarized which had been recognized service for at least five months in a war zone[reply]

3. I wonder what you are interested in these justifications since you have proposed the deletion of this historical document?

I summarize I've still accused of fraudulently cite false facts. I refuted this is the first that I alone had already corrected, given that you were right in the observation but without looking at the current documents I denied the second because you have confused two different medals. Perhaps once again I expect an apology from unjust accusations, always and only of you.

Now at least try to save this historic document erasure, thanks. --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Smithson, I don't think it is I who is confused. Do you agree that with this edit you added the text "Croce di Guerra al Valor Militare" to the article Gino Polli? And that the Croce di guerra al valor militare was instituted by royal decree 195 dated 7 January 1922? Do you not see that, unless you explain how and when Polli received that medal and how you know it, it looks as if you are intentionally misleading us? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Justlettersandnumbers, I do not think it's easy for your wife. I really wonder what is your job.

1. the first medal is not answered because you ask me about something that I already erased first ?! Now there is in the text Vittorio Veneto. Has at least the courtesy to respond to clarify. So in the first question I erase without you and your usually attack and are NOT intentionally misleading us? 2. NO war Cross Merit, but 3 War Merit Cross Medal . Are 2 differents kind of medals, and NOT was instituted on 19 January 1918 by Royal Decree of the King Vittorio Emanuele Re d'Italia in January 19, 1918 (I Write you up before), with the numbers 205. It was granted to all combatants Italians who had honorably served on active duty for a minimum period of usually five months in a war zone. 3 crosses x 12 months x 3. Satis est. What do you say I'll see you in person for a meeting? So as he received the medal? The medal he received for five months on the battlefield at the front, but you can not receive more than one medal every 12 months, then in three years at the front are received in each case 3 medals. More than 3 you can not have. And clear and not misleading, and everyone knows it. But how is it that you are always and only you to ask these questions? and with this tone? Think about it. Get a life. --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A WRONG WAY

Incorrectness and 'witnessed by internet page of Gino Polli discussion to a page that has the same the early commissioning CANCELLATION. THESE are the evils of wikipedia. that utilities had questions about Gino Polli and medals? --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian Art Prize

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Category:Italian Art Prize, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
The category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yopie (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

At this time, I've blocked your account indefinitely from editing. I'm afraid that the ability to communicate effectively and clearly with other editors is required to edit here. You may appeal this block through the normal process at the guide to appealing blocks, but I strongly advise that you first consider the feedback from other editors before you do so. If it's hard for you to read this message, please say so and I'll try to clarify it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of House of Orioles

The article House of Orioles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no Google hits, and no reliable sources. Does not appear to actually exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of the Three Mountains

The article Battle of the Three Mountains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

For "the biggest battle of field artillery of the First World War", suspiciously little has been written about this battle. I was unable to find any reliable, in-depth sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francesco Natoli

The article Francesco Natoli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No one outside of Wikipedia and mirrors has ever written this man's full name down. I do not think he existed, especially since the "Orioles" seem to be a hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francesco Natoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francesco Natoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Natoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of House of Orioles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House of Orioles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Orioles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giuseppe Galluppi

The article Giuseppe Galluppi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable local historian of Sicily. Supposed "biography" is about noble family Galluppi, not about him and his works.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yopie (talk) 16:27, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natoli

What is meant by "Italian of XVII" in "Giovanni Natoli, the noble Italian of XVII" ? JMK (talk) 12:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He was the First Prince of Sperlinga in the XVII century (also called Giovanni Forte Natoli or Gianforte Natoli). ask this? there's another John II, always prince.

--Alec Smithson (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fix more clearly.

Nomination of Vincenzo Cinque for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vincenzo Cinque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Cinque until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adriano Gajoni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adriano Gajoni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriano Gajoni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fernando Carcupino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fernando Carcupino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Carcupino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giovanni II Natoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giovanni II Natoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni II Natoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alec Smithson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stagno d'Alcontres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stagno d'Alcontres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stagno d'Alcontres until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gio Matteo Natoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gio Matteo Natoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gio Matteo Natoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antonino Mango di Casalgerardo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonino Mango di Casalgerardo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonino Mango di Casalgerardo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Art Craft Merchants Association (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]