User talk:Aks23121990

Please refrain from bombarding this talk space with random messages, which include, but are not limited to standard Wikipedia messages.

Polymer sponge

Putting this in the disability category is overcategorisation. see WP:SUPERCAT

I've put Category:Bionics as subcategory of disability. That seems more helpful. Rathfelder (talk) 08:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rathfelder.

February 2018

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rajiv Dixit, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hyperloop One, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --WikiHannibal (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD

Hi, I have reverted these edits. The information really should ideally come from an academic source but in any event the lead section is not the place to introduce citations and the point you are trying to make is already said in that section.

Feel free to reinstate the material at some appropriate location in the article body but please first read the entire article because I suspect it is already there. - Sitush (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be precise, the lead section already says There have been protests from groups outside the system who feel that it is inequitable.. That should be expanded upon in the article body. - Sitush (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Akhiljaxxn. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Religion in Kerala have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akhiljaxxn, you are being damaging to the complete information. Why would you not believe the news reports about the farce of secularism in Kerala? Atul Kaushal 05:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aks23121990. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aks23121990. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:7 Seconds: A Typical Teenager, Atypical Life

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:7 Seconds: A Typical Teenager, Atypical Life, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hello, Aks23121990. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Urmila Matondkar seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmin or Brahman

नमस्ते Atul Does it really matter what exact spelling is used for Hindi / Sanskrit / indian language words when the Roman script is so limited in its capability of transliterating Indian sounds ? For example, are you अटल, अतुल, or अटूल ? Since Brahmin is the more common transliteration of ब्राह्मण, I recommend that you leave that alone and spend your valuable time on more constructive edits.Regards.Jonathansammy (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Brahman is the only acceptable form for my Learner/Teacher creed.[reply]

Brahmin is the acceptable form here in English Wikipedia and most English sources I've seen in the internet. Brahman here means something else. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, I understand that this English language is very inferior and non-accomodating. Atul Kaushal 07:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC) By the way, the Brāhmäṇ cattle Brahman was imported from India to the Americas. I thought you were knowledgeable about it. Atul Kaushal 07:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about our knowledge or the "superiority/inferiority" of English language. English use the term "Brahmin" for the caste, so we write it as per WP:COMMONNAME. Nor to mention German is termed "Deutsche" by the natives but in English it becomes "German". BTW, I'm a Brahmin myself - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be a Brahmin but I'm a "Brāhmäņ" by birth. Atul Kaushal 15:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To each his own, I'm a Brahmin as per English but a Brahman/Baaman/Brahmon/Bamun in different languages of the subcontinent. Besides your talk is not the right place to discuss any changes. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chitpavan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. "Brahmin" is the WP:COMMONNAME for the caste in Wikipedia Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my user. Wikipedia is so bigoted. The research papers I need for completing my PhD are not here anyway. Atul Kaushal 12:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of stupid double-standard man are you? See your previous message. "User talk is not the place for such discussions." And now, "Do not add any commentary to articles." Atul Kaushal 12:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Aks23121990 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 12:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was an automated warning. You were trying to impose your POV to use the term "Brahman" in place of the commonly used English term "Brahmin" in this English Wikipedia. Rather ironic when you fail to understand simple guidelines and call other editors stupid at the same time. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need not call you anything. You are free to assume things. Atul Kaushal 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) You know what irony means right? I could have reported you for calling me names that time. Kindly maintain civility when conversing. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should anyway read my novel "7 Seconds: A Typical Guy, Atypical Life" (ISBN-10: 1520680961|ISBN-13: 978-1520680965) because the protagonist has the surname Kautilya. Atul Kaushal 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Date of birth of Jesus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Date of birth of Jesus appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Date of birth of Jesus. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Priyanka Gandhi. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akhiljaxxn, do you really think that a reference of the Economic Times is a poor reference? Give me a break! https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/spg-cover-gone-it-may-be-priyankas-bungalow-next/articleshow/71978639.cms?from=mdr Atul Kaushal 11:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And Akhiljaxxn, be my guest and delete my user. I have had enough of Wikipedia's double standards and bigotry.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aks23121990/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Aks23121990/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aks23121990! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aks23121990/sandbox

Hello, Aks23121990. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]