User talk:Ajnabh

February 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in several articles but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 13:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajnabh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ajnabh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like RhinosF1 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Suparak Nagari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Suparak Nagari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gajkesri

The article Gajkesri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems like a hoax, I can't find anything on a Google Search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ajnabh

A tag has been placed on User:Ajnabh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 04:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devi Jaratkaru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devi Jaratkaru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sheldybett (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gajkesri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gajkesri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 12:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Devi Jaratkaru, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 12:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suparak Nagari (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smartyllama was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What is this place? While articles can be approved even if they require cleanup, this draft is almost incomprehensible. It's not clear at all what this is referring to.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suparak Nagari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Suparak Nagari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smartyllama (talk) 20:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shado-Upchar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shado-Upchar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shado-Upchar (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shado-Upchar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shado-Upchar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Suparak Nagari

A tag has been placed on Draft:Suparak Nagari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nala Sopara Article already exists, this draft has nothing more than the existing article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mahishmati City

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mahishmati City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article already exists Mahishmati

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Avtar of Vishnu

Hello, Ajnabh,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Redalert2fan and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Avtar of Vishnu for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Redalert2fan}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Redalert2fan (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop creating pages of already existing information. You've done this several times and if you continue to repeat that you will be blocked. Please go though wikipedia to find if that info already exists, if it doesnt then create a page. Daiyusha (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Medha rishi

Hello, Ajnabh,

Thanks for creating Medha rishi! I edit here too, under the username QueerEcofeminist and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Subject of the article may not meet the WP:FICT, thanks and regards

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 12:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done That page is not protected, and your request is empty. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narayan Kavach moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Narayan Kavach is incomprehensible. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can improve the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chandragupta Maurya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 02:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think your belongs to nai caste i think you belongs to other Cate i know history of all Indian cast what i written in nai caste it all mentioned in puran granth so stop remove my edit your trying to remove history i don't know why ?your not born when history written. In Hinduism rishi write all things before it happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajnabh (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia is not a place to promote your caste: please use your personal website / blog for that purpose. If you continue to add dubiously-sourced caste-glorifying content, you'll end up getting blocked. If you haven't gone through the Wikipedia Tutorial yet, please do so before making any further edits. utcursch | talk 21:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not promoting caste i am adding true information about it and if you concern about caste promotion so why you do not remove other caste information they literally promoting them self .

And nai caste almost half information is false .

Daun(Caste)

Hi , Please show me any proofs about Nai clan belongs to Ikshvaku ?? I'm south india Sain(Nayi brahmin) Person. Nayeevaidya (talk) 08:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ikshvaku

IN tulsi das ramcharitramanas tulsidas ji using nau and nai in rapidly Ram ki nai ,ramchandra nau nau meaning in up language is using for nai comunity .

According to Devi Bhagvat puran when Ekveer (Nabhik) kill kalketu (talketu) the demon curs Ekveer his clan suffer from financial crisis in that time nai clan got first shrap clan became Shrapit in sout india site श्रापीत-नापीत they converted shra to na because according puran napit means who don't have son because pitar is son of devta but died before them. According to Buddhist literature they said Gautam buddha belongs to Ikshvaku but in Buddhist literature they told Ashoka he came in same clan in which Gautam buddha born but in Hinduism Ashoka belongs to Nai clan in Mahabharat, Devi bhagvat puran describe hole clan of Ikshvaku in that they mentioned name of chandragupt and Mahapadma nanda . But in my all caste name search i never heard or see daun caste in nai caste. And u written your name nayee vaidya

Fully fake news .. don't spread this type of news .. I'm sounth india nayibrahmin Nayeevaidya (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look you don't belongs to nai caste so stope removing my edit you don't know anything about nai caste and what i wrote it all written in puran understand.

Block

I consider your edits to Chaulukya dynasty were disruptive so I have blocked you briefly. If you continue in this way, you may find yourself blocked for longer. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samadhi vaishaya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samadhi vaishaya, is quite unclear, and does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs a rewrite and more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 09:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

I have indefinitely blocked your account, because your comments are distracting other users (eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nai(caste)), you are disrupting unrelated Wikipedia pages in pursuit of your goal (eg this edit to {{RfB}}), and you are consuming an inordinate amount of editor time (eg at Special:PermaLink/893872367#Nai caste). Sorry that this had to happen. You may like to know about the other language Wikipedias, as I think you could contribute to one and have the necessary, basic level of ability. AGK ■ 06:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How to delete my account permanently?

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Narayan Kavach

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Narayan Kavach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daiyusha (talk) 08:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shado-Upchar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shado-Upchar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daiyusha (talk) 08:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samadhi Vaishaya (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is impossible to understand.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samadhi Vaishaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samadhi Vaishaya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hayseera

A tag has been placed on Hayseera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:A10 duplicate of Hayagriva, also WP:G5

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as of July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaratkaru Devi

Hello, Ajnabh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaratkaru Devi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samadhi Vaishaya concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samadhi Vaishaya, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samadhi Vaishaya

Hello, Ajnabh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samadhi Vaishaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]