User talk:Aiman abmajid/Archive 5

Nomination for deletion of Template:RSA-OBR facilities

Template:RSA-OBR facilities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 18:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been moved to User:Aiman abmajid/RSA-OBR facilities, in case you wish to merge any of it with a more general infobox. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox consolidation

Members of WP:HWY, the global project for Highway articles on the English Wikipedia, have been working to consolidate all of the different infobox templates together. You may have noticed that already from several articles that now use {{infobox road}}. There is a second, companion template: {{infobox road junction}} that has also been updated. Both templates will use the same meta template to control the color of the headers inside the infobox, based on country, roadway type or some combination of the two. The two templates comply with color-usage restrictions in WP:COLOR, Wikipedia's section of the Manual of Style concerning Accessibility. If you have any concerns over how the templates are being used and would like changes made, please let us know. As of right now though, most of the templates you had created fail those Accessibility guidelines, which is why they've been consolidated into the one template. With as many as 80 separate templates at one time to make infoboxes for highway articles, it was felt that updating a few master templates to handle all the highway articles in the world would be simpler than redesigning the 80 templates. Imzadi 1979 → 18:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia state road routebox

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia state road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979 → 10:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia municipal road routebox

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia municipal road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979 → 11:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysia road routebox

A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysia road routebox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Imzadi 1979 → 22:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 175

Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 175 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 05:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To this nomination, the following templates were added:

Feel free to comment on the nomination if you wish. Imzadi 1979 → 05:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johor Bahru Interchange

The article Johor Bahru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable road junction

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 14:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:McDonalds signs

Template:McDonalds signs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Muhammad Faris Petra of Kelantan

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sultan Muhammad Faris Petra of Kelantan. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aiman, Earlier this year the community decided that all new biographies of Living People must have a source. As you are still creating unreferenced BLPs I'm afraid I've had to remove your wp:Autopatrolled flag as that has made it difficult for newpage patrollers to spot your new articles and tag them for referencing or deletion. We really appreciate your contributions, and if you would just start citing your sources I, or would hope any admin at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled will happily restore that flag. Cheers Ϣere SpielChequers 11:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correction of Asian Highway AH2 alignment in Malaysia

Greetings,

Recently I have read the Malaysian and Singaporean sectional database of AH2 and corrected the main article of Malaysian Expressway System. If you are free, please help me to correct the related routes.

According to UNESCAP, the AH2 alignment in Malaysia is like this:-

North–South Expressway Northern Route (Bukit Kayu Hitam - Bukit Lanjan - Shah Alam)
North–South Expressway Central Link (entire route)
North–South Expressway Southern Route (Nilai North - Senai North / Skudai; current status disputed)
Second Link Expressway (entire route; current status disputed)
FT 1 (Skudai Interchange - Johor-Singapore Causeway; current status disputed)

The southern part from Senai North onwards is currenly being disputed because Singapore claims the AH2 route alignment to be from the causeway to Bukit Timah Expressway towards Anak Bukit Interchange. Thank you. - Hezery99 (talk) 13:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elyas Omar

The article Elyas Omar has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yaacob Latiff

The article Yaacob Latiff has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelab Golf Negara Subang

The article Kelab Golf Negara Subang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006 micro stub - notability issues also?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelab Golf Perkhidmatan Awam

The article Kelab Golf Perkhidmatan Awam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2006 micro stub - also notability issues?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1975 AIA building hostage crisis

Hello, my friend: A group of us are working on clearing the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article in the above header has been without sources for the past four years and may be removed if none are added. I wonder if you can help do so. Sincerely, and all the best to you, GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jambatan Permatang Bendahari

The article Jambatan Permatang Bendahari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this subject as either name, Fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Motorcycle shelter for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Motorcycle shelter, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcycle shelter until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alor Setar North Interchange

The article Alor Setar North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join the Highways WikiProject

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
		Shortcuts WP:HWY WP:HWY/E WP:HWY/AS WP:HWY/AF WP:HWY/O WP:HWY/LA
Hi, Aiman abmajid, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject and its new regional taskforces! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, or anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new international highway WikiProjects. We have recently created five regional task forces focused on Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Latin America. To improve road and highway articles, here are guidelines for B class criteria. Please add any higher GA, FA quality articles to the international roads portal. Also, please help out by inviting new or unfamiliar editors with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/New articles/Invite template.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

JCbot (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

South Klang Valley Expressway interchange listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Klang Valley Expressway interchange. Since you had some involvement with the South Klang Valley Expressway interchange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia

This user helped promote Malaysia to good article status.

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For recognition of work on Malaysia. SilkTork *^YES! 14:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very useful, readable and professionally presented article. One of the best articles I've encountered. Now get working on building up other articles. Well done. SilkTork *^YES! 14:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Changlun Interchange

The article Changlun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jitra North Interchange

The article Jitra North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jitra South Interchange

The article Jitra South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kepala Batas Interchange

The article Kepala Batas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gurun Interchange

The article Gurun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungai Petani North Interchange

The article Sungai Petani North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 03:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungai Petani South Interchange

The article Sungai Petani South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bertam Interchange

The article Bertam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungai Dua Interchange

The article Sungai Dua Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Permatang Pauh Interchange (NSE)

The article Permatang Pauh Interchange (NSE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seberang Jaya Interchange

The article Seberang Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perai Interchange

The article Perai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penang Bridge Interchange

The article Penang Bridge Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 14:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juru Interchange

The article Juru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Tambun Interchange

The article Bukit Tambun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jawi Interchange

The article Jawi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bandar Baharu Interchange

The article Bandar Baharu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alor Pongsu Interchange

The article Alor Pongsu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Merah Interchange, Malaysia

The article Bukit Merah Interchange, Malaysia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taiping North Interchange

The article Taiping North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Changkat Jering Interchange

The article Changkat Jering Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kuala Kangsar Interchange

The article Kuala Kangsar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meru Raya Interchange

The article Meru Raya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ipoh North Interchange

The article Ipoh North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ipoh South Interchange

The article Ipoh South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tambun Interchange

The article Tambun Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simpang Pulai Interchange

The article Simpang Pulai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gopeng Interchange

The article Gopeng Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tapah Interchange

The article Tapah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bidor Interchange

The article Bidor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungkai Interchange

The article Sungkai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slim River Interchange

The article Slim River Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Behrang Interchange

The article Behrang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanjung Malim Interchange

The article Tanjung Malim Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lembah Beringin Interchange

The article Lembah Beringin Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Beruntung Interchange

The article Bukit Beruntung Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungai Buaya Interchange

The article Sungai Buaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rawang Interchange

The article Rawang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 16:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rawang South Interchange

The article Rawang South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hospital Sungai Buloh Interchange

The article Hospital Sungai Buloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sungai Buloh Interchange

The article Sungai Buloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Lanjan Interchange

The article Bukit Lanjan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Permatang Pauh Interchange (BKE)

The article Permatang Pauh Interchange (BKE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Raja Interchange

The article Bukit Raja Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shah Alam Interchange

The article Shah Alam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Subang Interchange

The article Subang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damansara Interchange

The article Damansara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ebor Interchange

The article Ebor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seafield Interchange

The article Seafield Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USJ Interchange

The article USJ Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Putra Heights Interchange

The article Putra Heights Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nilai North Interchange

The article Nilai North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UPM Interchange

The article UPM Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kajang Interchange

The article Kajang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bangi Interchange

The article Bangi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Putra Mahkota Interchange

The article Putra Mahkota Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nilai Interchange

The article Nilai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seremban Interchange

The article Seremban Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Port Dickson Interchange

The article Port Dickson Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedas/Linggi Interchange

The article Pedas/Linggi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simpang Ampat Interchange

The article Simpang Ampat Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tangkak Interchange

The article Tangkak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Gambir Interchange

The article Bukit Gambir Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pagoh Interchange

The article Pagoh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yong Peng North Interchange

The article Yong Peng North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yong Peng South Interchange

The article Yong Peng South Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ayer Hitam Interchange

The article Ayer Hitam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Machap Interchange

The article Machap Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simpang Renggam Interchange

The article Simpang Renggam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sedenak Interchange

The article Sedenak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Senai North Interchange

The article Senai North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skudai Interchange

The article Skudai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kempas Interchange

The article Kempas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dato' Onn Interchange

The article Dato' Onn Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pasir Gudang Interchange

The article Pasir Gudang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lukut Interchange

The article Lukut Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Senai Airport Interchange

The article Senai Airport Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saleng Interchange

The article Saleng Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pulai Interchange

The article Pulai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nusajaya Interchange

The article Nusajaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nusa Indah Interchange

The article Nusa Indah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Indah Interchange

The article Bukit Indah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:North-South Expressway interchanges

Template:North-South Expressway interchanges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 17:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The remainder of the navboxes in Category:Malaysia expressway and road templates were added to the nomination as well. Please feel free to comment at the discussion. Imzadi 1979 → 18:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bandar Saujana Putra Interchange

The article Bandar Saujana Putra Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paya Jaras Interchange

The article Paya Jaras Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Subang Interchange

The article Bukit Subang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Jelutong North Interchange

The article Bukit Jelutong North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jelatek Interchange

The article Jelatek Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ampang-MRR2 Interchange

The article Ampang-MRR2 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hulu Langat Interchange

The article Hulu Langat Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bandar Tun Hussein Onn Interchange

The article Bandar Tun Hussein Onn Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Damansara Interchange

The article Sri Damansara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penchala Interchange

The article Penchala Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bandar Utama Interchange

The article Bandar Utama Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TTDI Interchange

The article TTDI Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damansara Utama Interchange

The article Damansara Utama Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SS 2 Interchange

The article SS 2 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taman Megah Interchange

The article Taman Megah Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelana Jaya Interchange

The article Kelana Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jalan Majlis Interchange

The article Jalan Majlis Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Freescale Interchange

The article Freescale Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PJS Interchange

The article PJS Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Puchong Jaya Interchange

The article Puchong Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jalan Kuching Interchange

The article Jalan Kuching Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sentul Pasar Interchange

The article Sentul Pasar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Setiawangsa Interchange

The article Setiawangsa Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taman Hillview Interchange

The article Taman Hillview Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenwood Interchange

The article Greenwood Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Tinggi Interchange

The article Bukit Tinggi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bentong East Interchange

The article Bentong East Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karak Interchange

The article Karak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lanchang Interchange

The article Lanchang Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Temerloh Interchange

The article Temerloh Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chenor Interchange

The article Chenor Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maran Interchange

The article Maran Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Jaya Interchange

The article Sri Jaya Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kuantan Interchange

The article Kuantan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Semenyih Interchange

The article Semenyih Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pajam Interchange

The article Pajam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mantin Interchange

The article Mantin Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Setul Interchange

The article Setul Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ampangan Interchange

The article Ampangan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bulatan Darul Ehsan Interchange

The article Bulatan Darul Ehsan Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bulatan Jubli Perak Interchange

The article Bulatan Jubli Perak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alam Impian Interchange

The article Alam Impian Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kemuning Interchange

The article Kemuning Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jengka Interchange

The article Jengka Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kewajipan Interchange (NPE)

The article Kewajipan Interchange (NPE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pantai Interchange

The article Pantai Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pantai Dalam Interchange

The article Pantai Dalam Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pantai Baharu Interchange

The article Pantai Baharu Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ulu Tiram Interchange

The article Ulu Tiram Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cahaya Baru Interchange

The article Cahaya Baru Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Rimau Interchange

The article Bukit Rimau Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hicom Interchange

The article Hicom Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kewajipan Interchange (SAE)

The article Kewajipan Interchange (SAE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinrara Interchange

The article Kinrara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:25, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Awan Besar Interchange

The article Awan Besar Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sukom Interchange

The article Sukom Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Petaling Interchange

The article Sri Petaling Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SKVE Interchange

The article SKVE Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:28, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mont Kiara Interchange

The article Mont Kiara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Hartamas Interchange

The article Sri Hartamas Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pusat Sains Negara Interchange

The article Pusat Sains Negara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of INTAN Interchange

The article INTAN Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Kiara Interchange

The article Bukit Kiara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kerinchi Interchange

The article Kerinchi Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kayu Ara Interchange

The article Kayu Ara Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Section 17 Interchange

The article Section 17 Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TTDI North Interchange

The article TTDI North Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as a separate entity. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 07:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2006 Nibong Tebal bus crash

The article 2006 Nibong Tebal bus crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS and no indication of continuing notability or maintenance, wholly unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salak Interchange

The article Salak Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. The pertinent information on this subject should be already covered in the appropriate roadways' junction lists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 15:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]