User talk:Ahshoja

Welcome!

Hello, Ahshoja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fairfax internal medicine associates, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairfax internal medicine associates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fairfax internal medicine associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James G. Zumwalt

The article James G. Zumwalt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfax internal medicine associates

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fairfax internal medicine associates, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fairfaxinternalmedicine.com/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairfax internal medicine associates

Hello Ahshoja,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fairfax internal medicine associates for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 22:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Sideways713. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ghazal Omid, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sideways713 (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ghazal Omid. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Note that you may add negative content in the articles of living people, provided that it's reliably sourced and not given undue weight, but that unsourced claims and original research will never be acceptable. If you wish to dispute the validity of a claim already made in an article, raise the matter on the article's talk page and/or tag the claim appropriately. Sideways713 (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iranian missile boat Paykan (1977

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iranian missile boat Paykan (1977 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://overlord-wot.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-battle-of-missiles.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 06:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khosrow Rezvani has been accepted

Khosrow Rezvani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahshoja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had not committed a copywriter infringement in the past: specifically, the warning about "Fairfax Internal Medicine Associates" page did not speak about "copywright" at all. Let alone that I was working for that entity at the time. I did not pursue the matter then, as the outcome would have had minimal effect on our day to day operations. With this posting, ALL the posts, were referenced. A statement about posting without permission, when reference is mentioned, is not conform the scientific writing rules. I need to be unblocked in a timely manner, otherwise this page will be deleted and all my effort to add an important contributor to apoptosis research to Wikipedia, will be lost, as I will not be allowed to repost the deleted article. Ahshoja (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's hard to understand what you are saying. You were indeed warned about copyright issues with regard to Fairfax Internal Medicine Associates, back in 2014. Now you seem to be claiming you worked for them, or on behalf of them. On that basis, I'm extending your block to an indefinite one, for violations of WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:PROMO, WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:SPAM. Yamla (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indefinite suspension

Hi,

I was suspended because “I was being paid to create a page for the medical practice where I was a partner in”. Does this mean that whomever is working in a medical practice, is not allowed to inform their patients of their expertise and which services are available for them?

Thanks 173.79.209.173 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]