User talk:Ahmed Lutfe Inam

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ahmed Lutfe Inam! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on your talk page. middle message Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help it improve by becoming a regular editor with adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Inam (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Inam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahmed Inam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ahmed Lutfe Inam, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 04:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmed Lutfe Inam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahmed Lutfe Inam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Ahmed Lutfe Inam. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam, You can write about yourself on your User Pgae. Thank You Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 07:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddiqsazzad001: That's true to an extent. It needs to be primarily oriented toward Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a social media site or web host. This includes your user page. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Route 132 - YouTube

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Route 132 - YouTube requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ KN2731 {t ⋅ c} 09:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Route 132 - YouTube

Hello Ahmed Lutfe Inam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Route 132 - YouTube for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Route 132 - YouTube, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Effects of Indian Serials in Bangladesh. - Arjayay (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Effects of Indian Serials in Bangladesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Effects of Indian Serials in Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 05:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Effects of Indian Serials in Bangladesh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Effects of Indian Serials in Bangladesh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam

User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 13:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleo, Can you tell me what ressons behind this delection notice. Thank You Siddiq Sazzad (Chat)

@Siddiqsazzad001: please click on the above link to see the discussion and its nominator's rationale. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 14:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Have it Inam Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 15:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN

Hi there Ahmed, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. With regard to this talk page comment, where you tell Siddiqsazzad001 to check with you before editing Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College, sorry, but that's not how it works. Any editor who is editing in good-faith is allowed to edit and shape articles. You don't own that article, Wikipedia owns the article. Please see WP:OWN. If there are specific objections that you have to Siddiq's edits, you are at liberty to open a discussion on the article's talk page to discuss. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Uttara Town College) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Uttara Town College, Ahmed Lutfe Inam!

Wikipedia editor Chandan Guha just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I can see that you are new to Wikipedia. You need to add a link from an article, not a talk page. You also have to add more citations. Please improve this article. Don't be in a hurry to add too many articles. Take your time. Cheers.

To reply, leave a comment on Chandan Guha's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chandan Guha (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College

Please do not add external links to the bodytext of articles, or make unsourced additions, as you did at Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College.
Please read, and follow, Help:Referencing for beginners, and add proper citations for your edits - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But shouldn't I add about teachers and education system?Ahmed Lutfe Inam (talk) 03:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, as said so.Ahmed Lutfe Inam (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above warning about the removal of maintenance templates would also apply to this edit, where you removed the article orphan template and the refimprove template. Considering that no other article links to that article, and the bulk of references about the school come from the primary source, i.e. the school itself, there is no justification to remove those templates. When you repair the issues, then you may remove the templates. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your latest removal of maintenance templates here did not fix the issue. The article (again) has no other article that links to it, hence it is an "orphan", and (again) the bulk of references in the article come from a single primary source. Find more secondary sources please, and please do not remove the templates until you do. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check now, I've added a secondary source. Ahmed Lutfe Inam (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove those templates again without properly satisfying the issues, I will suspend your editing privileges. This isn't rocket science. To resolve the orphan issue, find another article that should intuitively link to that article and add a link. If you can't find an article that should intuitively (meaning, not forced) link to Uttara Town College, leave the template alone. Those directories are not sufficient secondary sources. I provided you with a link to our guidelines on how to determine what a secondary source is, but obviously you didn't read it. Find major news sites, magazines, books, something, not just random directories like this. We're trying not only to prove that the school exists, but that the information contained in the article has been checked by other established references. If you can't find a few, leave the template alone. The templates are not punishments, they exists to communicate to other interested editors that specific improvements need to be made to the article. Understand? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do.

MfD nomination of Draft:Ahmed Inam

Draft:Ahmed Inam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ahmed Inam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ahmed Inam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 05:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed, please stop creating articles about yourself. Wikipedia is not a social networking platform. We only care about notable subjects and you do not yet qualify. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Uttara Town College, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siam Ahmed

Hello again. I noticed your {{delete}} at the article (which you rightfully removed). If you think the article should be deleted, since it's already listed at WP:AFD, please consider voting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siam Ahmed. These are not votes done by count, but by arguments supported by policies (WP:!VOTE for more information). Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 12:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bioscope (Live TV), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Global (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of user page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Please do not recreate pages that have been deleted per discussion with the same content. You were aware that the delete discussion had occurred and could see the notice about that deletion on the page before re-creating it. —DIYeditor (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of speedy deletion templates

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove speedy deletion templates from Wikipedia articles without providing a valid reasoning in the edit summary, as you did at User:Ahmed Lutfe Inam. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop recreating promotional user page, per MFD decision. Stop evading/removing speedy deletion template and follow instructions above if you wish to contest it. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Request for user page

Hi, I agree that my user page was promotional. But please, I am new here. i didn't know the rules. Now how can I make my user page again? :'( I will not mention my personal info again, I promise. Just there will be a short description, contribution to Wiki and social links. Isn't that OK? AhmedLutfeInam 10:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I think that social links may have been part of the issue. But since the page was protected, I suggest asking an administrator for help (like Shirt58 who protected it). —Paleo Neonate – 10:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. AhmedLutfeInam 10:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, I think as a new user a little less leeway is given, but the user page is supposed to primarily relate to Wikipedia. As PaleoNeonate says I think the major thing that contributed to the problem was linking to social media (or mentioning it). Also linking to/mentioning the "Upwork" stuff is questionable. Generally the things about your business, social and personal life are less appropriate, and Wikipedia is not a social networking site or webhost (WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK). You have been provided these sort rules repeatedly before and it would pay to read links you are given in detail, as well as things like template instructions and notices on your talk page, so you do not, for example, repeatedly remove templates when the instructions clearly say not to do so. To be honest, I feel that you were either intentionally ignoring the personal information/web host issue that was raised so many times, or have so much difficulty reading and understanding English that things are going to be difficult for you here. Creating a user page is not the important thing here. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Siddiqsazzad001 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. I understand that you and this other person are friends; still, it is not advisable for you to edit his userpage. We have no way of knowing whether you are doing it with his consent. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for user page

Hi, I strongly understand your opinions. I understood that Wikipedia is not for userpages. But as I like writings, I just want to add some writings about me. And previously I promised that it would not be promotional again. And sorry for the edits on userpage of my friend. He has some lackings of grammar and so I just fixed it. I will be very happy if you allow me to create my userpage again. And their will be no social links, I promise now. AhmedLutfeInam 05:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I suggest commenting on the WP:ANI discussion about you then. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahmed, and thank you for your message.

Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. It explains why I have decided that you should not be able to re-create your user-page.

Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I get it. Wikipedia is not like social medias. But is there any way I can create my userpage again? I already mentioned that I would not do those mistakes again. AhmedLutfeInam 10:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

You have not already mentioned the issues from Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. It should be obvious what Shirt58 is referring to. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

People are not watching Wikipedia talk:Guidance for younger editors for administrative actions, so posting there does not speak well for competency. A talk page is about discussing the contents of the page it is associated with, not for administering the topic. At this point I think you need to convince Shirt58 since he is handling this. Also you have not explained removing deletion templates when the instructions clearly say not to. Like I said, finding the WP:ANI report about you and responding there might be helpful. Seems like you need things repeated several times, which wastes other editors' time. —DIYeditor (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing templates if you don't know what purpose they serve

I don't understand why you removed this template. This template adds the article to a category so that interested editors know that the article needs geocoordinates so that readers will know exactly where on the planet this school is. Why would you remove it? Are you opposed to articles having geocoordinates? See the article on Dhaka? Notice the geocoordinates 23°42′N 90°22′E in the infobox? This tells us exactly where Dhaka is. Please stop removing templates if you don't know what constructive purpose they serve. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]