French

The discussion has been moved to the appropriate Talk page where others may contribute to the discussion. AEuSoes1 20:14, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure what to do with your behavior. I am restoring the French section to the version before our editing dispute. I suggest that you make yourself involved in the dispute resolution proces so as to make consensus, as I have begun doing, before making any more edits to the section. This problem will not solve itself solely by reverts and re-reverts.AEuSoes1 23:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I’m glad you’ve decided to work on compromising. I do like most of your edits but I’ve kept the nasal vowel and distinct-articulation paragraphs out. You’re going to need some sourcing on those two. Although I took out the diphthong paragraph, I won’t argue with its reinclusion as long as you replace the question marks:

The English diphthongs /eɪ/, /ɔɪ/, /aɪ/, /oʊ/, and /aʊ/ do not exist in French and speakers may monophthongize them into /e/, /??/, /??/, /o/, and /??/ respectively.

Also, just to clarify, I prefer my examples of not reducing vowels to schwa because they are actual examples that appear on the link at the bottom. It’s also clearer which vowels should be reduced. I’m not sure why you’ve objected to them and preferred your example, but I’m willing to listen.

I also included [ɛ] as a possible realization of English /æ/ since it is phonetically closer to [æ] and various languages with [ɛ] and [a] but not [æ] usually realize /æ/ as [ɛ].

AEuSoes1 02:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Antenna" Paris Districts

Thanks for the correction. I've been living here too long : )

Take care,

THEPROMENADER 08:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rue Royale

Agateller,

I noticed your "rue Royale" addition - if you are interested in Paris streets, how about participating in the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Paris_Streets that's just getting started? Thanks if you can, and please sign up! It's no small task so it can use all the help it can get : )

Thanks, take care,

THEPROMENADER 23:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperspace

Hi, could you do me a favor and revisit Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hyperspace? I have added some comments which I hope will convince you to change your vote! ---CH 23:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Euro pic nomination

Just to let you know, I nominated your picture of the Euro symbol for featured picture. See Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Euro. BTW, where is the "official documentation" you based it off? Perhaps, you could link to the webpage where you got that documentation from. -Hyad 04:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is my pleasure to announce that Image:EuroConstLarge.png has just become a Featured Picture! Congratulations, and thank you for creating it for us. Raven4x4x 10:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Computer science

Hi! Just wanted to welcome you to WikiProject Computer science. Looking forward to collaborating with you in the future. --Allan McInnes (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Design

Hi, I changed your edit of intelligent design being a "theory" back to a "concept" as per wikipedia words to avoid. Dodo bird 10:42, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:HuntsTomb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HuntsTomb.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 11:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EuroConstLarge.png

Congrats, commons:Image:EuroConstLarge.png is Today's featured picture! I noticed that you created it, and w:Image:EuroConstLargeColor.png, using Illustrator. If you've still got the .ai files, could you please export them as .svg as well? Thanks, Melchoir 00:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(User:RainboxRed seems to have made an attempt with Image:Euro.svg, but it's a far cry from your version!) Melchoir 00:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut!

Hello! Due to your request for adminship, I went through your contributions list. :-) You appear to be the kind of editor wikipedia needs. If you don't get promoted this time, please contact me when you have around 1500 edits (so we can satisfy the silly edit-counters). I also know a number of people who enjoy writing featured articles. Perhaps you can hook up with them and have fun? :-) Drop me a line, either way! Kim Bruning 02:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the mean time, maybe you'd like to use irc to go to irc.freenode.net #wikipedia , and maybe talk with me there? I'd best ask you my standard questions anyway. :) Kim Bruning 17:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Collaboration

Greetings,

There is a task I am working on that I hope you can help me with. At the moment, the English language version of Wikipedia does not seem to have an article on Maissemy, and I would like to change that.

Most of the documents I have found so far are written in French, and I do not understand that language Do you have any suggestions on where I might find appropriate resources for creating such an article? Any constructive information you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. --Folajimi 14:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've translated the French Wikipedia article and added it to the English Wikipedia. I'm not sure where one would find English-language resources for a French commune with a population of only 195 people, but there are some links to French resources, which I can check out as time permits. Do you have a specific interest in this particular commune? Agateller 16:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the article. The only reason I was looking to create the entry was because I got tired of seeing the red link in the encyclopaedia's entry on Pierre Fouquier. There is very little information I could find on the subject; I figured that the links should be blue at least... --Folajimi 17:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's as good a reason as any. I don't like red links either, and I sometimes spend a lot of time writing stub after stub just to eliminate the red links (sometimes I write a full article if I know about the subject). Agateller 01:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A while ago, I gave up on some planned contributions because I couldn't find someone to translate the documents, which were written in French. Would you be available to help out with this effort? Your rather invaluable experience would be greatly appreciated. Folajimi 02:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation can be a very time-consuming activity and I'm often short on time, but I can certainly try to help with some translations, as long as I don't have to meet any deadlines or anything. Agateller 07:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a firm believer in the following mantra:

"Don't visit your neighbor too often, or you will outwear your welcome!" Folajimi 10:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance, could you please tell me what this article has to say about Deschamps? I know that he was a surgeon of great renown during the late 1700s, but that is about as much as I do know.

There is a brief reference to him about a third of the way into the article; I'd appreciate it if you could tell me what was said about him in the article. Folajimi 23:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

I am minded to change my vote, if you can explain/retract/otherwise reassure me about your 'angry young male' epithet. I am an irritated (and I am told irritating) middle-aged male, and the description is uncomfortably close to being me. I wouldn't want an admin who was prejudiced against a gender. Hope you understand, and don't mind my putting this in your talk rather on the RfA. I will paste from here and/or my own talk if I decide to change my vote as a result. Best wishes --Guinnog 22:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The mere fact that my epithet irritates you does indeed imply that you are in the category of persons for whom I use it as a euphemism. Angry young males take everything personally and base their opinions on the strong emotions they feel as a result, like spoiled schoolkids on a playground. That's a very poor basis for making decisions like RfA, but I won't retract the epithet, as it is simply too descriptive of reality (as your bargaining request itself demonstrates). I've spent decades working with computers and interacting in cyberspace, and angry young males are a constant and overwhelming pox on the medium. I cannot in good conscience overlook the trouble they cause. Agateller 01:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. It certainly clarifies things for me and helps me to decide my vote. Best wishes --Guinnog 06:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on your RfA

I rarely participate in RfA these days, in part because I find the attitudes of those on RfA so annoying. I've supported your candidacy, even though it seems likely to fail, because I think you're a perfect example of the sort of person who is very likely to be a good admin on Wikipedia but fails to meet the absurd requirements that those who frequent those pages have seen fit to enforce. These people seem prefer obsessive-compulsive power control freaks to rational people whose edit Wikipedia casually and dispassionately, and since you seem to fall in the latter category more than the former, your candidacy was doomed from the start. I was especially impressed by the editor who opposed your candidacy because you had the sense to walk away from a conflict. The mind boggles.

Anyway, my condolences on being run over by the drunken steamroller that is RfA. I hope that you don't take this as a personal setback and continue to participate in the project; hopefully some day in the not too distant future we'll have an admin promotion system that actually makes sense.

Regards, Kelly Martin (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't really have put it better myself. I'd just like to add that I think it's rather a shame it did fail and was delisted; two comments, that of "angry young males", and the "treehouse club" comment, I thought were hilarious, but smacked the nail right on the bonce. robchurch | talk 21:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

Hi Anthony, Since your RFA was failing badly, and further continuation would be pointless, I have gone ahead and closed your nomination. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EuroConstLarge.png

Do you have a vector version (SVG) of this image? It might be useful to upload such. Ss181292 09:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France

A proposal for a WikiProject France was made at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#France, it is still in the pipe line. Would you like to contribute to it? STTW (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab

I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) --Zantastik talk 00:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:FritzScreenshot6.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:FritzScreenshot6.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meryl Getline

I like what you did with this article. I don't have a particular interest in the subject, but I originally rescued the article from some mysterious (and libelous) Biblical numerology stuff. (Also see Ellen Church.) Getline seems to have made some enemies in her career; I'm glad to see you toned down some of the comments that had been added. --Brianyoumans 19:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

flypaper formulas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flypaper

Hi Agateller, I'm asuming you wrote most of the text for the flypaper article? I was wondering if you know where I could find the recipe(s) for some of these various "formulas" for the sticky stuff that goes on flypaper? I'd like to make my own, so any help or resources you might know of would be most appreciated. Thanks. --TextureSavant 19:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opera Ischia

Hi. I'd support deletion if you want to propose it. -- Kleinzach 01:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The use of disclaimers on Image:KEWB_ILS_5_approach_plate.png

I'd like to make a note that I plan to remove the disclaimers on that image as per Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. The disclaimer on the image is made redundant by Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer. I thought it may be a good idea to flag this up on your user page first, since I didn't want to start an edit war. tommylommykins 14:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits

Thank you for your generous edits towards the Aircraft landing lights article. I started the article and it is good to see the wonderful work you have done to it.Senators^{Talk | Contribs} 05:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Re Incandescent lamp: Moving pages by cutting and pasting text from one to another is not permitted, because it breaks the edit history (potentially causing copyright problems for WP, since we don't have a record of who the authors are). Pages must be moved with the move button. Controversial moves or moves where the move button won't work must be discussed first on the article's talk page. There is a defined procedure for requesting a nontrivial page move. See Wikipedia:Requested moves.--Srleffler 17:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

You deserve a barnstar. Axl (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Technology Barnstar
		To Agateller, for contributions to articles about vehicles. Axl (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of MULTICOM

A tag has been placed on MULTICOM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please note I am only putting this notice up as a courtesy to you as it seems that you were not notified by the person actually tagging the article - and as an admin working through some tasks - I prefer for editors to be given a chance to 'save' articles.--VS ^talk 07:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Run-up

An editor has nominated Run-up, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run-up and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delco Carousel

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Delco Carousel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gurwitch Products

I worked on it a bit for you. {[;-)} Hamletpride (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Blacklight (band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Blacklight (band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Blacklight (band) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Blacklight (band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image wanted

Hi. I noticed you commented on this engine image. You may like to comment on the planned new image here Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your EKG/ECG picture

nice job, there's two minute errors, that is, it's not called PR-segment/PR-interval, but PQ-segment/interval, as it ranges from the end of the P wave to the beginning of Q, maybe you could fix this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryonic (talk • contribs) 20:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated banner for WikiProject Computer science

I have made a proposal for a integrated banner for the project here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 04:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New image project

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:TokyoRoseMugshot.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TokyoRoseMugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of VIVENDI

I have nominated VIVENDI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIVENDI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Agateller! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 293 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Laura Mercier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of A86 (software)

I have nominated A86 (software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A86 (software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 09:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Oleo Strut (restaurant)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Oleo Strut (restaurant), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.myspace.com/oleostruttx. As a copyright violation, Oleo Strut (restaurant) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Oleo Strut (restaurant) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Oleo Strut (restaurant) and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Oleo Strut (restaurant) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Oleo Strut (restaurant).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Herb143 (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pack (aircraft)

The article Pack (aircraft) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dicdef

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FALANT

Thanks for starting the FALANT article. I changed some things about it being originally an aviation test. I've included a reference. I'm actually researching color blindness and military policy. Where did you learn that the Air Force discontinued the FALANT in 1993? I know they have, but this Wikipedia page is the only reference I can find the a date. Thanks so much. Huckfinne (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GrandeArchePD.jpg

Salut, je vois que tu parles Français donc je me permets ! J'ai fait pointer l'article français sur l'Arche de la Défense vers ton image, qui est sur la page anglaise et semble sans restriction de réutilisation. Par ailleurs, à propos de ton super logo Euro.png, il est vraiment top, et la façon dont il est dessiné laisse supposer que tu l'as fait via un outil vectoriel. Si c'est le cas et que tu as encore les sources, pourquoi ne pas l'ajouter en SVG ? Bravo et respect pour toutes tes contributions ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel JARRI (talk • contribs) 23:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC) De Rien ! Visiblement, certaines versions de Adobe Illustrator peuvent exporter en SVG : http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Illustrator/14.0/WS714a382cdf7d304e7e07d0100196cbc5f-655ba.html A bientot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel JARRI (talk • contribs) 01:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GrandeArchePD.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GrandeArchePD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heinz Stucke Photo

Hi,

I run the bike touring site http://travellingtwo.com and I'm writing a book about bike touring (a practical guide).

I'd like to use your Heinz Stucke photo in the book (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HeinzStueckeParis.jpg). Would that be possible?

I can credit you and offer you a free copy of the eBook when it's done.

If you can email me, that would be great: friedel at travellingtwo dot com

Thanks!

Friedel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.210.36.237 (talk) 13:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Uris

While nationality is what's required in the lead, there is no requirement for later sections of the article that could possibly justify this edit. I've reverted and linked the whole term rather than just "Jew". Yworo (talk) 20:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your comment about the Grande Arche image

Hello, Agateller. You have new messages at Bkell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Again at my talk page. Also, in the future, please provide some context for your questions. Many administrators deal with hundreds of images a week, and it's unlikely that your particular case is particularly memorable, especially five months later. Asking about "the photo of the Grande Arche that I uploaded" without providing a link, a date, a filename, or any other kind of context is going to be confusing. I've added a note to User talk:After Midnight explaining what you're talking about. —Bkell (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hunt's Tomb

The article Hunt's Tomb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 17:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MassExtinctionTimeline.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MassExtinctionTimeline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CRAFT (aviation)

The article CRAFT (aviation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A four year old article that has never had any references, seem to be a non-notable subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Double-take, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClearTypePixels2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ClearTypePixels2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thelion

The article thelion is up for deletion. Can you explain where this definition came from? The validity of the term is in question, as can be seen from the talkpage. Thanks Lucy346 (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Folies Bergere after renovatation of facade 2013.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Folies Bergere after renovatation of facade 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Day length into Daytime (astronomy),

At Talk:Daytime (astronomy). Pierre cb (talk) 15:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Tomb of Oscar Wilde, Père Lachaise cemetery, Paris, France.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tomb of Oscar Wilde, Père Lachaise cemetery, Paris, France.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:KEWB ILS 5 approach plate.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KEWB ILS 5 approach plate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the lockstitch png file / Ward Christensen

First, thank you for your contributions!

However, I was trying to see how a sewing machine worked, and came across the image of the lock stitch, which I find "impossible" -- it showing the BOBBIN thread being brought ABOVE the material every other stitch. OK, it MAY be possible, but another commenter who has many years as a taylor said it was all wrong but didn't get into the details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WardXmodem (talk • contribs) 23:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Agateller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

light bulb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Light bulb. Since you had some involvement with the light bulb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 19:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the fine heart rhythm EKG diagram. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 15:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barlow's disease

See Talk:Barlow's disease, where I have answered a question you poised in 2006.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Agateller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agateller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agateller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Human Writes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Human Writes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bateaux parisiens

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bateaux parisiens, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"David Robert Hayward-Jones" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Robert Hayward-Jones. Since you had some involvement with the David Robert Hayward-Jones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. The Anome (talk) 10:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Confiture de lait

The article Confiture de lait has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the same as Dulce de leche, does not give the difference between the two and it cites no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ReyHahn (talk) 10:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peroxisome image misspelling

Hey, just wanted to let you know that there is a minor typo in the image of the peroxisome you made for the Peroxisome page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peroxisome#/media/File:Peroxisome.svg

Should be "crystalloid" instead of "cristalloid."

23.25.142.37 (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ProgramCallStack1.png

The file File:ProgramCallStack1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File has been exported to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BateauxMouchesLarge.jpg

The file File:BateauxMouchesLarge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, replaceable with files at c:Category:Bateaux Mouches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ASRCExtract.png

Thank you for uploading File:ASRCExtract.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]