User talk:Emmanuel JARRI

Image copyright problem with Image:GPE_2.7.png

Thanks for uploading Image:GPE_2.7.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:GPE 2.7.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GPE 2.7.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RabidDeity (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tools used for Euro sign

Thanks for the compliments. I built the Euro sign image with Adobe Illustrator, but I don't have any tool to convert it to SVG, which is why I didn't upload it in that format. Agateller (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
131	MP/M (talk)	Add sources
77	Phoronix Test Suite (talk)	Add sources
993	GNU (talk)	Add sources
9	OpenZaurus (talk)	Add sources
25	Gmane (talk)	Add sources
4,975	Eastern Time Zone (talk)	Add sources
511	Apache Hive (talk)	Cleanup
1,725	Free and open-source software (talk)	Cleanup
60	Sugar (software) (talk)	Cleanup
10,388	Linux (talk)	Expand
248	Database trigger (talk)	Expand
201	Multiuser DOS (talk)	Expand
388	Comparison of relational database management systems (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
62	Sharp Zaurus (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
75	Psion (company) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
176	Window manager (talk)	Merge
87	X window manager (talk)	Merge
100	Burroughs MCP (talk)	Merge
118	Enlightenment (software) (talk)	Wikify
512	Wayland (display server protocol) (talk)	Wikify
44	Query Rewriting (talk)	Wikify
2	Whitix (talk)	Orphan
22	Scriptcase (talk)	Orphan
3	Amyris Fuels (talk)	Orphan
11	Familiar Linux (talk)	Stub
24	Olwm (talk)	Stub
32	Qvwm (talk)	Stub
36	Wm2 (talk)	Stub
37	Swm (talk)	Stub
54	Information schema (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hi Emmanuel JARRI! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at National Association of Realtors that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK I understand, thank you for the clarification.

However, my modification was still appropriate. I don't have any link with this trade association. I was doing researches and as it says on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Home_Builders : The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) is one of the largest trade associations in the United States,[1]

with ~ 140,000 members,

then, when I saw NRA has 1,4 millions members, it is definitely one of the biggest.

If not the biggest, as states this article : https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/careers/jobs/national-association-of-realtors-nar/

Out of precaution I simply added "one of the biggest", which is definitely true.

Thank you. Emmanuel JARRI (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]