User talk:AgambensreMarx
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, AgambensreMarx. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
AgambensreMarx, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi AgambensreMarx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC) |
July 2019
[edit] Hello, AgambensreMarx. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.
Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.
Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
GermanJoe (talk) 17:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Please carefully read WP:SELFCITE and suggest further similar additions of the same author on the articles' respective talkpages instead of adding them yourself. Assuming you have a possible conflict of interest, mass-adding your own publications is not acceptable. I will revert the recent additions, but please feel free to suggest such changes on article talk following proper procedure. GermanJoe (talk) 17:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Refspam again
[edit]Please stop refspamming Michael P. A. Murphy's publications (e.g., most recently, here and here), as MrOllie and GermanJoe already warned you about above. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 12:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)