User talk:Afernand74/Archives/2021
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Afernand74. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Rocket U-boat
 | Hello, Afernand74. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Rocket U-boat at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978: Thank you. Very much appreciated. --Afernand74 (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- No problem; it's an interesting article to read and work on. Good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Very much appreciated. Afernand74 (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for connecting to Wikidata and digging up another source on his year of death! I agree that 1794 is the verifiable date of death (printed in most sources), but I'm not sure it is true, so I'd rather keep that with a question mark. See this section. The source you gave mentions this as the original source, which says "At Edinburgh, Dr Charles Irving, late of Jamaica". This seems to be what everyone else has copied, and in conflict with other sources appearing earlier that treat him as dead. I'm not totally sure what to make of it, hence the question mark. Happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 21:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for John Coster-Mullen
On 11 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Coster-Mullen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Coster-Mullen discovered that the Little Boy was actually a girl? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Coster-Mullen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Coster-Mullen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Editing news 2021 #2
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hivernage
|
The WikiChevrons | |
| Hi Afernand74, just a note of thanks for your contributions to Hivernage. The camp at Courneau looks really interesting, have you thought about starting an article for it? - Dumelow (talk) 12:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC) |
@Dumelow: Thanks a lot for my first WikiChevrons :-) Creating a page of Courneau in EN wiki is certainly on my todo list. There are countless interesting FR pages and I don't have much spare time for creating pages from scratch. Would be easier to have the translation gadget available to speed up the creation of FR pages in EN wiki. One day may be. Afernand74 (talk) 15:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Hivernage
On 8 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hivernage, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the First World War, Senegalese Tirailleurs would be withdrawn from the Western Front to overwinter in camps in the south of France or northern Africa? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hivernage. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hivernage), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging