Jump to content

User talk:Aeichler1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Monica Lewis

[edit]

Hi. You need to cite a reliable source when you make factual changes. Otherwise when others read the article they are unable to be sure about the accuracy of what they're reading. This is particularly true when the previous information's been there for quite a while and other sources also lists the same. Please readd your edit if there's a source, but there have been 3 of these changes made now in the last 24 hours, the two earlier ones an IP making the same edit. I also notice that of the 3 edits from this account 2 have changed birthdates without explanation like this ([1]). Please provide some sourcing for these so future readers can follow up if they need to, and we can all ensure accuracy. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Syosset High School, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. To add yourself to the article as a notable person, you need a wp article about you (or a ref showing how you are truly "notable") Epeefleche (talk) 08:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aeichler1. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 08:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references: 

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

== References ==
{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1], which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 03:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 10:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 16:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just to follow on to this, if you can find at least one more reliable, independent source that supplies significant, direct coverage of Kate Hall, this may be valid for inclusion. Right now, the article features an NYT obituary -- which is a decent start -- but no other references incorporate anything more than passing mention of Ms. Hall, generally as part of a list of performers. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 16:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annette Warren for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annette Warren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Warren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. wctaiwan (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB has been removed as a source and other sources have been substituted. Miss Warren is a reputable artist with substantial credits and numerous references within Wikipedia itself. Aeichler1 (talk) 06:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)aeichler1Aeichler1 (talk) 7 August 2011[reply]

Titles

[edit]

Please review: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles) before adding any more titles of books, television programs, films, episodes, etc., etc. Thanks. 209.86.226.57 (talk) 07:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Where does the link Hotel go? Please check your links. 209.86.226.56 (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Kate Hall

[edit]

Hello Aeichler1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kate Hall.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kate Hall}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Gray Harris has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Gray Harris. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 03:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Gray Harris (December 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
[In addition to the comments below:] Please augment the draft in such a way that it's clear Harris satisfies either WP:PERSON or WP:ARTIST. (It's not necessary to satisfy both.) --
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Aeichler1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian Eichler Watson has been accepted

[edit]
Lillian Eichler Watson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Incredibly interesting article, thank you! I followed a couple links and ended up here and frankly I feel pretty sold on it, she really was good at her job. You may want to nominate the article for a WP:DYK. Rusalkii (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lily Ann Carol has been accepted

[edit]
Lily Ann Carol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 06:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lillian Eichler Watson

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Lillian Eichler Watson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Eichler

[edit]

Hey, Aeichler1! If you are Alan Eichler, or a family member, you'll need to disclose that on your user page and stop editing directly. You can request edits via WP:Edit request at Talk:Alan Eichler. valereee (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lillian Eichler Watson

[edit]

Hey, Aeichler1. You're adding stuff from sources we can't use. Please go to Talk:Lillian Eichler Watson and let's discuss. valereee (talk) 21:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lillian Eichler Watson

[edit]

On 20 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lillian Eichler Watson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lillian Eichler Watson created "Again She Orders – 'A Chicken Salad, Please'" (pictured) to advertise her 1921 Book of Etiquette? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lillian Eichler Watson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lillian Eichler Watson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Gray Harris

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Aeichler1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Gray Harris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William Gray Harris

[edit]

Hello, Aeichler1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Gray Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Calling All Stars (1934 musical), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 07:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was simply adding Ella Logan as another cast member, which she was. It was her American stage debut. Aeichler1 (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ella Logan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look to the Rainbow. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aeichler1&oldid=1187198373"