User talk:Aecis/Messages 469-480

Regarding Yuri Schukin

I changed the nationality because he is no longer a Russian citizen. The Association of Tennis Professionals website, as well as the tournament website that Schukin is playing in, both list him as a Kazakhstani now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GAThrawnIGF (talk • contribs)

• The last time he was in the main draw of an event, I know he was Russian. It must have been a recent change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GAThrawnIGF (talk • contribs)

Vereniging Basisinkomen

I am kindly asking you to remove the notability tag from Vereniging Basisinkomen. I can understand that you do not like the deletion of a comment from a user talk page, but this is no way to behave. Guido den Broeder (talk) 07:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the tag. Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Note my comment in Talk:Vereniging Basisinkomen#Vivant - it's still a small mention, but two political parties recognizing the organization is enough to settle things for me. Also, based on the AFD extant I'd say that the page is here to stay. WLU (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Well fuck me what a pain in my ass. I think I'll just leave the page until the AFD plays out. If the page gets re-nominated for deletion, I'll reconsider with a bit of distance. It's hard to delete a page you've edited : ) The issue of POV-forking and coatracking should be considerably reduced but the notability is still very, very tenuous. Sorry for the potty-mouth, I hate changing my mind and I'll have done it twice now if I re-visit the AFD. WLU (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, many more political parties have recognized the Vereniging. Agalev, EVP and PvdA were members of the Werkplaats. Later, GroenLinks, De Groenen and the JOVD (VVD youth section) based their advocacy of a basic income in part on the work of the Vereniging, just like Vivant and the Natuurwetpartij. We just don't have the online proof yet. Guido den Broeder (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Print sources are viable for sourcing notability, they're just harder to work with. WLU (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

And harder to locate. I wish I had known at the time that I was going to need them here... :) Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Dutch

When posting to public discussion pages like WP:AN3, please post only in English. Comments should be understandable by all users. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

BiH Croats

You are going to merge this article with those 3 sugested, right? Just, please don't delete them. Ceha (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Cool, thanks:) Ceha (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ver. Basisinkomen

Beste Aecis. What is the difference. I thought I did do so by suggesting it to be deleted on [1]. What did I do wrong? Migdejong (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Eredivisie 2007-08

Based from Eredivisie#European competition.

Also the number 10 to 13 enter the playoffs, with the 10th ranked team facing the 13th, while the 11th team faces number 12. Then both winners meet each other in the next round and finally challenge the loser of match G for a special situation spot. The special situation spot comes in hand when the KNVB Cup winner is among the top 7 ranked teams. In that case this team is already qualified for Europe and does not need to qualify through the playoffs, resulting in the special situation spot team to get an Intertoto ticket.

The current situation of Roda is, Ajax would finish above 5th. This may lead Ajax joins UEFA Cup, at least, from Eredivisie directly. Being the another finalist, Roda cannot finish 7th or above. According to the article, Roda would likely, I don't dare saying "certain", getting a UEFA Cup spot from KNVB Cup. Raymond Giggs 02:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. My fault. Raymond Giggs 02:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh my goodness. So who could make a change in Eredivisie? When seeing your words, I felt very confused.
So I didn't made any changes in the next year's UEFA Cup article. Not certain, but very complicated. Raymond Giggs 02:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say that you did an absolutely fantastic job keeping this article up to date. Amazing job. I haven't done much on the article at all, mainly because I got lazy thinking "whatever, Aecis will take care of it" :) I hope you'll keep it up! Cheers, JACOPLANE • 2008-04-20 21:29

I'd like to redraw the format again. The top 5 failed to play in KNVB Cup final made a messy situation.

PSV - direct UCL GS slot
Ajax, Breda, Twente, Heerenveen - UCL 3QR playoff
Ajax──────────┐

             ├──┐

Heerenveen────┘ │
　　　　　　　　　　 ├UCL 3QR slot
Breda─────────┐ │

             ├──┘

Twente────────┘
This is pretty sure that the losers of final and the winners of 4rd/5th-placed match will get a UEFA Cup ticket... well, so what's then? Raymond Giggs 06:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Eerste Divisie 1956-57

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eerste Divisie 1956-57, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://medlibrary.org/w/index.php?title=Eerste_Divisie_1956-57&action=edit. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Paraguay

Can you please change the Paraguay blurb to delete the phrase "single-party rule" as that implys that all other parties were illegal. I think the blurb works perfectly with just those words removed, but it has also been suggested that the phrase "dominant-party" or a variation thereof would also be acceptable. Thanks. -- Grant.Alpaugh 11:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Re Mark Mullen Deletion

Sorry but I'm a bit new at this. You deleted my Mark Mullen article earlier and messaged me about it. How do you contest deletion in the Deletion review discussion board? Thanks.

NewsGuru (talk) 21:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)NewsGuru

GDB again

Note. WLU (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Guido den Broeder

Hello, a discussion you started is used as evidence in this RfC/U. Fram (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

One last (?) edit at vereniging basisinkomen

Hi Aecis,

Guido den Broeder is asking for an edit at Talk:Vereniging Basisinkomen. I'm disinclined to make it given my inability to read the sources, the lengthy and unpleasant request for comment on his actions, and my ongoing dismay at his representation of sources. Could you please comment for me, given your ability to read Dutch and status as an admin, ergo an editor recognized for your ability to interpret policy? I would be most appreciative, but unfortunately you can't e-mail candy. WLU (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Note that I've also posted at the Netherlands wikiproject [2], and the section that spawned this request can be found here, at the bottom. Thanks, WLU (talk) 14:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)