User talk:Adpb

Speedy deletion of User:Adpb/sandbox

The page User:Adpb/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spencer^T•C 11:54, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the sandbox here: User:Adpb/sandbox. What is your relationship to the subject with that page? Best, Spencer^T•C 12:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spencer, thanks for restoring the Sandbox. The subject is a well known person in Sri Lanka and the relationship to me is he is my elder brother. In writing the biography I maintain full independence and maintain impartiality, this will be reflected by the biography referencing from reputed sources. I thank you again for your time and consideration this posting. Thanks! Adpb (talk) 10:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I uploaded a photo to the biography and have permission for it's upload and assigning licensing. I noticed that this photo had been deleted. I will re-upload the file for review given this information, however, if additional information is required please let me know. Thanks again for your time and consideration. Very Best! Adpb (talk) 10:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dr ADP Baddevithana 2020 - Wikipedia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dr ADP Baddevithana 2020 - Wikipedia.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Whpq (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whpq, I did leave this message on your page and unsure if I followed the correct process to ask you the following -

I uploaded a photo for use on a biography page and have the licence for the photo’s use in Wikipedia from the copywrite holder. I noticed that the image has been tagged for deletion. Since I do have the licence to upload and use this photo please advise the steps I need to take to prevent deletion - should I re-upload the photo stating more succinctly the granted licence and if so should I use the “commons.wikimedia.org” process as I did the first time. Many Thanks

You will need to have the copyright holder provide permission. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Note that the copyright holder is usually the photographer and not the subject of the photo. -- Whpq (talk) 22:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me on this. I just received permission in writing from the copyright holder and have forwarded the email and attached permission letter together with the link to the image as well as reference to this talk to the email address - permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I would be very grateful if you would let me know the next steps in the process. Many Thanks!

You should add {{subst:OP}} to the file description to indicate that a permission has been sent and is waiting on OTRS to process the permission letter. -- Whpq (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that permission was provided yesterday to Ticket#: 2020050210002018. Would it be possible to know when the delete order on the image will be lifted? Many Thanks!Adpb

Hello, Adpb. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(talk) 11:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Adpb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. As the subject is your brother, please see the above message about important ways to manage your conflict on interest. Spencer^T•C 03:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of note, instead of directly editing the page, suggest changes on the article talk page using {{request edit}}. Additionally, I am going to move the article to Draft namespace where the article can be given further review. It is located at Draft:Anil Baddevithana. I have taken care of the next step for you, to submit the article for review. Additional tip: please check out Wikipedia:Notability (people) for more information on drafting a biography on someone, especially the Basic criteria on that page. Best, Spencer^T•C 03:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spencer, thank you for the update regarding moving the article for further reviews. I was of the understanding that when the biography was presentable from the Sandbox version, the additional reviews would be made once the item was moved to Wikipedia, thus the reason for the move; apologies for moving ahead of this.

Regarding potential conflicts of interest, at the top of the affected talk page I have disclosed “This user has declared a connection.” Please let me know if I should add any further information or if I should remove this.

I have followed the Wikipedia criteria and as mentioned before, I have been very careful to avoid any undue influence in the reporting of this topic and reported only facts, and included newspaper and other referencing that show the notability of the subject.

If not too much trouble, I would be very grateful if you would let me know the next steps in the process. Regarding the timeframe, from where we are now, how many days does the review process take until a final decision is made for the article to be included in Wikipedia? Thanks for your time and consideration. Thanks! Adpb (talk) 11:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adpb, no problem. The talk page notice is appropriate and meets this requirement. As for next steps in the progress, you can continue editing and improving the page while it is in draftspace. For example, I would caution you that the "Dr ADP Baddevithana, Campaign Introduction" source from Facebook is likely not reliable per sourcing guidelines, and another published source like a third-party newspaper would be more recommended. I will be honest, I'm not sure the exact timeframe for article reviews in the Draftspace, but it could take several days at the very least. Spencer^T•C 14:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted regarding the source from Facebook, further evidence added to support this reference. Thanks!Adpb (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Whpq

Hello, Adpb. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 10:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anil Baddevithana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anil Baddevithana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr ADP Baddevithana 2020 - Wikipedia.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr ADP Baddevithana 2020 - Wikipedia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anil Baddevithana

Hello, Adpb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anil Baddevithana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]