User talk:Adiraihaja

This is Adiraihaja's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

unreferenced?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Adiraihaja/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Adiraihaja/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Adiraihaja, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 21:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen

Hello Adiraihaja,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adiraihaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to create a Biography for Kalvithanthai Haji SMS Shaik Jalaludeen. He was a famous philanthropist who lived in Adirampattinam, Tamil Nadu, India and he established a number of educational institutions in Adirampattinam town. Therefore, I request you to unblock me in order to complete the contribution to the Wikipedia 08:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Adiraihaja

Decline reason:

It's possible that this gentleman is a suitable subject for a Wikipedia article, but there were so many problems with your submission that it would require a complete re-write before being considered. Before unblocking you, we need to know that these problems will not occur again. Please explain, in your own words, what was wrong with the draft you submitted, and why you were subsequently blocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adiraihaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The draft article was poorly sourced and sometimes unreferenced. I would resubmit the article according to the Wikipedia policies Adiraihaja (talk) 08:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There was a lot more wrong with it than that. Please have a read of WP:NPOV and then think again about what you wrote. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, as Yunshui asked you above when declining your first unblock request - please explain, in your own words, what was wrong with the draft you submitted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adiraihaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As advised by you, I have read the WP:NPOV fully and accept the norms of Wikipedia while writing the article. The draft article contains some unbalanced sentences that need to be removed. I assure you that I would follow the required guidelines in the future. Hence I request you unblock me to edit the article. Adiraihaja (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your responses, it would clearly harm Wikipedia to unblock you at this time because you have no idea how to write a neutral article. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As one example, you wrote "The darling son of Adirampattinam became very dear to Allah and reached His abode on October 2, 1986. He set an example to others. Haji.S.M.S.Shaik Jalaludeen was born great and also achieved greatness by his immortal activities. Thus he lives in the midst of us forever." How would you rewrite that if you were unblocked? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As indicated by you, the sentence will be rewritten as " After achieving greatness by his immortal activities, Haji S.M.S. Shaik Jalaludeen died on October 2, 1986. He lives in the midst of us through his valuable service to the society. Adiraihaja (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Firstly, you should not rewrite the unblock request that I replied to and only include your latest reply in it, as that will make it confusing for other people to follow. Just add your reply below mine, as I have reformatted here.
Next, sorry, but that shows you really don't understand the problems at all. A Wikipedia article should be factual and neutral in tone, not full of praise for the subject - and your draft was full of sycophantic praise from start to finish. An article is supposed to be informative and educational, and not an obituary, a memorial or a monument. So "After achieving greatness by his immortal activities" should not be there, and "He lives in the midst of us through his valuable service to the society" should not be there. The sample I quoted should be written as simply something like "Haji S.M.S. Shaik Jalaludeen died on October 2, 1986." and nothing else. Fact, verifiable sourced fact, and only fact - no opinion, no praise, no editorializing. The whole article suffered from the same problem. Please thoroughly read WP:NPOV again, and also please read WP:PEACOCK. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have read both WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK. I would correct all biased sentences in the article and rewrite in a simple style. I extend my thanks for you speedy replies and constant guidance. Adiraihaja (talk) 11:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've demonstrated that you are not capable of doing so. Very likely, you won't be unblocked without a promise to avoid editing in that subject area. --Yamla (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have understood the problem. If you unblock me, I would contribute to the Wikipedia within the policies and guidelines. The mistake happened since it is my first article on Wikipedia. I assure you that I would not commit such errors in writing an article in the future. Adiraihaja (talk) 05:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]