User talk:Adhurim Jakupi

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GeneralNotability (talk) 22:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Standard WikiProjectAlbania Invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

--Maleschreiber (talk) 01:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Adhurim Jakupi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Maleschreiber (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please respond in Talk:Battle of Košare

I see you're a new contributor, so I just wanted to give you a heads up. We should try to avoid edit warring (per WP:EW), so please respond in the Talk section on the Battle of Košare article if you disagree with my edit to the infobox. Thanks.--Aleksamil (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Battle of Paštrik. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Paštrik; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –User 45 65 41 15:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting or I'll request XCP. –User 45 65 41 16:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adhurim Kacupi, you are reverting on an article which falls under Arbcom sanctions and you run the risk of a strong reaction. You've already been blocked once and that seems to have made no impression on you. You are continuing to push your version, on the grounds that only you know the truth. This would be a good time for you to patiently wait for consensus at Talk:Battle of Paštrik. Administrators who notice this dispute will probably have to decide whether to indefinitely block you from Wikipedia or to ban you from editing Balkan articles. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Battle of Paštrik. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, edit summaries like this one are unacceptable. Note that for Wikipedia, ethnicity of contributors is irrelevant. Only the strengthen of sources is relevant. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at Battle of Košare. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adhurim Jakupi: Can you, please, explain those edit summaries: [1][2][3]? Vanjagenije (talk) 18:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sali Çekaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Košare. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ekrem Rexha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ekrem Rexha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ekrem Rexha

Hello, Adhurim Jakupi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ekrem Rexha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ekrem Rexha

Hello, Adhurim Jakupi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ekrem Rexha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ismet Mustafa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ismet Mustafa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 20:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ismet Mustafa

Hello, Adhurim Jakupi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ismet Mustafa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ismet Mustafa

Hello, Adhurim Jakupi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ismet Mustafa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]