This is an archive of past discussions with User:Adambro. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→

10 July 2007

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dftlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dftlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

11 July 2007

Shakespeare authorship

I'd like to draw your attention to User:Smatprt who, in my opinion, has been intent on rewriting the Shakespeare Authorship article for the last year to promote his view that the Earl of Oxford was Shakespeare. I am only interested in article balance. See here for the list of his edits [[1]] (Felsommerfeld 16:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC))

Hi. Sorry you've been dragged into this. It's true, I have an expertise and I make edits about what I know. Felsommerfeld wrote the following about this article: "*I mean why are we even having this discussion? The guy from Stratford wrote it all, period." If he had his way there would be no article on the authorship question at all. Since he cannot kill the article he is trying to edit out anything which challenges his position, including deleting whole sections without input or discussion. Now you know...the rest of the story.Smatprt 01:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Felsommerfeld's accusations of sockpuppetry have gone way too far. He knows, as do the actual long-time editors of this article (of which he is not), that Ben Jonson and I are two very different individuals that happen to see eye to eye on the authorship issue. Feel free to investigate, research or whatever you need to do to confirm this. For starters, BenJonson lives fulltime on the east coast, I on the west. Check our IP's or whatever (I am not that technical to know how you check, but I know you can and immediately clear this up and stop Felsommerfeld from his one-man war.Smatprt 01:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Smatprt is smart enough to use different IP addresses. Please check out the Shakespeare Authorship discussion about user BenJonson and read the evidence in detail. You can form your own opinion. (Felsommerfeld 01:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC))

15 July 2007

Thank you.

I appreciate the speed in which you resolved this situation.

-Robert Cargill

No problem, I'm glad I could help. Regards. Adambro 18:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

(ec)Me too. And thanks for the message at my talk so I could unblank the page right away. -- But|seriously|folks 18:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

11 August 2007

Regarding my block

Notwithstanding the fact that my block was bullshit and you completely abused your "power" as an admin by blocking me and the other user without going through the proper processes of reporting and allowing a judgement to be made, I also take serious issue with your conduct in regards to PeeJay. You obviously [2] saw his vile, insulting personal attack, and issued a warning. However, when the comments persisted [3], you chose to tuck tail and cower as opposed to issuing a deserved block. It's nice to know that wikipedia utilizes admins who show such disregard for accepted practices and who choose to ignore insulting personal attacks. Batman2005 00:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

16 August 2007

mw:User:Adambro

I hereby confirm mw:User:Adambro to be my account. Adambro 19:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

17 August 2007

The Apprentice (UK)

Hello, Adambro/Archive 8 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK Series Three)'s Peer Review-Review now please! 15:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

25 August 2007

Re:Hornetman

As far as I know subpages of banned users are deleted because they are useless and no longer needed. SLSB talk • contrib 16:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I have replied on your talk page to make it easier to follow the conversation by keeping it in one place. Adambro 16:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

26 August 2007

Hello.

Hi! Please find somewhere for the following pictures, as you deleted them from the Lincoln Central article. (May I note that not all of them should have been deleted from the article.)

Please dont upload them to the commons. Thanks AC Best 20:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

29 August 2007

Deletion of Dewsbury Museum entry

Regarding your deletion of Dewsbury Museum's entry as a "blantant copyright infringement of http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/events/documents/DewsburyMuseum-AHistory.pdf". As curator of Dewsbury Museum, I posted the entry in addition to being the writer of Dewsbury Museum- A History pdf" - I would be grateful if you could restore the entry.

G. Scanlan Museum Officer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.173.35 (talk) 15:57, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

8 September 2007

deleted wiki page

You delted my page?! how do i get it back?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jothri (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

???

im confused what was wrong with it?

13 September 2007

Pennine Waterways links

There is a discussion about the appropriateness or otherwise of some links that have been added to a number of pages, and subsequently removed. As you are a member of the project, you may wish to comment at

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Waterways#Pennine Waterways Links —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayalld (talk • contribs) 14:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

16 September 2007

Birmingham meetup

Hi there, I noticed you put your name down as interested in a Birmingham meetup. Just letting you know, the date is now set as Saturday 20th October. We really need input on where, and what time we will meet, so comments would be much appreciated on the page. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

28 November 2007

Danny The Third Grader

I've seen you have deleted the page.But it is an upcoming Nickelodeon show/animated.Even though it's not on google webpage.It would be nice if you wrote the page of it.

Classification of admins

Hi Adambro. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 22:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)