User talk:Acetic Acid/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Acetic Acid. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Archives
- Archive 1 (July 22, 2005 - August 1, 2005)
- Archive 2 (August 1, 2005 - August 2, 2005)
- Archive 3 (August 2, 2005 - August 4, 2005)
- Archive 4 (August 4, 2005 - August 6, 2005)
- Archive 5 (August 6, 2005 - August 19, 2005)
- Archive 6 (August 19, 2005 - August 26, 2005)
- Archive 7 (August 26, 2005 - August 31, 2005)
- Archive 8 (August 31, 2005 - September 5, 2005)
Thank you for the welcome
It was good of you to offer the welcome. If it is not too much trouble, I could use some help. I have created a couple of pages. These pages are now gone. They now redirect to other pages that don't have my content. I understand that my contributions may get edited, or even removed; but what are the rules for this? Since the pages are gone, there is no history or discussion to read. Someone made a comment on my talk page that they thought one of my pages should be merged. I agreed with caveats, but never heard anything again. Was there a vote? Can I just recreate the pages? It seems a lot of energy is exerted by people to limit the scope of Wikipedia. Several times I have read interesting pages only to find there is a discussion about deleting the page entirely. Is this the official position of the Wikipedia, or only the result of one faction within it? Am I welcome?
Thanks, Peter --Gearspring 21:30, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Re:Erwin Walsh
I have blocked the user for 24 hours rudeness/personal attacks. Upon his/her return, should he/she do anything like that again, make we aware and I will take a gander. Regards and happy editing! Sasquatch讲看 02:17, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your strong support and reassuring comments in my recent RFB nomination. I'm now WP newest bureaucrat. :) Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:38, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
deleted edits
well, a user's deleted edits are still recorded (they must be to allow the undeletion of pages later), but at the moment it's too slow to extract the information because of how it's stored.. i'll keep the idea in mind though. -kate
Thank ya, thank ya very much ...
Ryan,
Thank you for the brief message when I logged on to Wikipedia. I've just put up a User profile. New User: Barry Wells of London, Ontario, Canada. Quite a remarkable project this Wikipedia. Barry Wells 21:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
re: Signature
Hi, thanks for the guidance. I was aware that templates caused a server drain, but I didn't realise that all the talk pages would have to be re-cached if I changed it. I made a template out of my sig so that I could change it not to include the link to my RfA once it was no longer applicable (so that older talk messages would be updated as well), but I didn't know that just changing it would drain the servers so much. I've gone back to not using the template now. - ulayiti (talk) (my RfA) 08:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
ulayiti's RfA
Hi Acetic, and thanks for your support and the kind words you left at my RfA. I'm an administrator now, and I hope that I'll live up to the community's expectations as one. Your vote of confidence is much appreciated. - ulayiti (talk) 15:48, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Splash's RfA
Hi there. Thanks for your strong support on my RfA and for apparently earning me another vote (#20)! I was amazed to see so much support. Please do keep an eye on me and my logs, especially while I'm learning the new buttons, and let me know if I can help you out. Next time you're on RfA, I imagine you can expect me to support you, by the way. Thanks again. -Splash 14:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Leonard G.'s RfA
Thanks for asking the question of The Fascist Chicken - I was about to ask the same question of him/her on their talk page (I thought it inappropriate to ask it on my own RfA page). I wonder, why do the negative comments come from users with monikers like "The Fascist Chicken" and "Angr" (Anger?). This admin stuff is looking like it is more trouble than it is worth - not to do, but to get - all I really need is some tools to assist in my anti-vandal efforts. Thanks for your assistance, and best wishes, Leonard G. 03:55, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
your signature..
...I like it. Neat idea :-) splintax (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
My RFA
Thank you very kindly for your support of my nomination. I promise your trust hasn't been misplaced; I will only be slightly buzzed with power, but never drunk. ;) · Katefan0(scribble) 21:30, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the Welcome
It takes time to learn. :-)
Calvin 05:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism by 204.209.247.2
Hey, mate. You're the first admin who popped into my head, so here I am. I could use your services with User:204.209.247.2 (Special:Contributions/204.209.247.2, User talk:204.209.247.2) due to its excessive vandalism. I can't block him myself if needed (I just gave him his last warning), so I'm just asking that you keep an eye on him. Thanks for the help. --Blackcap | talk 18:02, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Responded there. --Blackcap | talk 07:25, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I edited the Junko Mizuno article. I don't know if it's still no neutral. Cheers! --Julián Ortega - drop me a message 00:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your support of my RfA, which I have formally withdrawn. The full text of my withdrawal and statement of appreciation is on the RfA page. Best wishes, Leonard G. 03:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
WP:MIND 22:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the Wikipedia:Mind Benders! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by Deryck C.. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to Riffsyphon1024 for winning our logo competition! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!
Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 22:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
RfA
Go to that sekrit place where I prepare my RfA's and take a look at what's there. P.S. you're not allowed to edit it! ;) Redwolf24 (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ahhh... I so adore edit histories :) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 23:33, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Bmicomp's RfA
Well, my RfA has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 23:39, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the Welcome
I've been on fr lately, but thank you anyway ;) Comte0 10:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
The charter is here. (Relating to Esperanza)
Hello Acetic Acid, the Charter for Esperanza is up. Take a looksie :) Redwolf24 (talk) 02:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Archive bot
See User talk:Who#Archive bot. ; - ) Redwolf24 (talk) 05:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza made less bureaucratical
Hello again, I have (unilatterly) taken away the 'assembly' idea, as per my reasons at that edit summary and per Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Charter. I have left the admin general, as some leadership is good. Now, all you have to do is be a member to establish consensus, the whole assembly idea is gone. Also, I have added an advisory committee, of four members, with limited power besides watching over the admin general and making sure he doesn't do anything stupid. Please look at the ammended charter, and I would love a comment. Redwolf24 (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
CCW Agenda
I saw the redlink to the CCW Agenda; what was the intention for the agenda, and why is it still redlinked? -- Essjay · Talk 00:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
WP:MIND 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Acetic Acid/Archive 9! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.
Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!
Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
WP:MIND 06:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Acetic Acid/Archive 9! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.
Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!
Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
WP:MIND 06:24, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Acetic Acid/Archive 9! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.
Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!
Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:24, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
The last time I'm spamming you all with Esperanza stuff
Hello Acetic Acid. As you may or may not know, there have been some troubles with Esperanza. So now, as a last ditch to save the community, please vote at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Reform on all neccisary polls. P.S. I'm very sorry for spamming you all with these messages, and this will be the last time. I recommend putting ESP on your watchlist. Cheers and please look at that, let's stop the civil war then. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
question sir?
How do I get one of those fancy public domain logos in a picture I donated?
Alphalife 18:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
RfA
Just to say thanks for supporting my RfA. Please let me know if you see me screw up anytime. --Doc (?) 19:14, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one!You are getting a peer review!!!!!
here ..... *ducks* Ryan Norton T | @ | C 16:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)