User talk:Acetic Acid

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

• Archive 1 (July 22, 2005 - August 1, 2005)
• Archive 2 (August 1, 2005 - August 2, 2005)
• Archive 3 (August 2, 2005 - August 4, 2005)
• Archive 4 (August 4, 2005 - August 6, 2005)
• Archive 5 (August 6, 2005 - August 19, 2005)
• Archive 6 (August 19, 2005 - August 26, 2005)
• Archive 7 (August 26, 2005 - August 31, 2005)
• Archive 8 (August 31, 2005 - September 5, 2005)
• Archive 9 (September 5, 2005 - September 25, 2005)
• Archive 10 (September 25, 2005 - October 9, 2005)
• Archive 11 (October 9, 2005 - June 8, 2008)
• Archive 12 (June 8, 2008 - September 3, 2012)

Welcome back

Good to see a 2005 old-timer back in the project, and doing well in real life. If you need any help getting used to the website again let me know, as a lot has changed. Thanks Jaranda/Secret ^account 21:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Ditto that; I don't recall seeing you around the first time, but it's good that you've come back. — Hex (❝?!❞) 14:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Fancy that!

	A baby hedgehog for you!
	Hey Ryan! No need to be jealous - here's an adorable baby hedgehog! And yeah, hi! I can't believe it's been so long - so much has changed! I keep meaning to get back on here, but just never seem to get around to it... How's your life these days? Up to anything exciting? —Celestianpower háblame 16:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Periodic Table Bugbear!

Hi Acetic Acid,

                       Sorry to bother you over something so incendental as this but I was wondering if someone could please correct a slight error to the Wikipedia Periodic Table.  These pages are a wonderful resource I regularly enjoy using, however every time I visit the front page displaying the table I notice that several 'other non-metal' elements are incorrectly coloured as 'halogens'. Would it please be possible to resolve this nerdy bugbear of mine?!
                                Yours over-enthusiastically,  Dameon (6 October 2014). 88.144.199.216 (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Acetic Acid

Hey, Acetic Acid. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Amanda Swafford for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Swafford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Swafford (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

introducing myself, and question

Hello, thanks for checking in and leaving a message a while ago.
I'm learning how this works in advance of needing help as I move slowly along (pls delete this if wrong). If I have a question about an edit, do I leave messages on my own talk page and tag you or post on your talk page? I only know you and one other contributor as you guys wrote on my talk page.
Thanks!
nabejero (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Nathalie (nabejero)

Proposed deletion of File:Essjay 666.gif

The file File:Essjay 666.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Essjay 666.gif

The file File:Essjay 666.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image that is unlikely to have future encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

I apologize. I should have checked the file's history. Since it had already been proposed for deletion, it cannot be proposed again. I will nominate it through another process.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Essjay 666.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Essjay 666.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Acetic Acid a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

"Properties" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Properties and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 25#Properties until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. D.Lazard (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

"Property (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Property (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Property (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)