Jump to content

User talk:Abune

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge

[edit]

Hi, feel free to add your entries to this, we don't have many coming in for Georgia! Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not interested, just say and I won't bother you again haha!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Thank you ! I do what I can 😉 ! User:Abune (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of botanical gardens in China

[edit]

Hello, Abune,

Thank you for creating List of botanical gardens in China.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add few references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Amkgp (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of botanical gardens in México

[edit]

Hello, Abune,

Thank you for creating List of botanical gardens in México.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It would be good to have a reference for the red links in these list articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 19:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gardens in Philippines

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gardens in Philippines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of botanical gardens in Ecuador moved to draftspace

[edit]

Please don't create lists that consist primarily or entirely of redlinks. Wait until there are more than 50% existing articles to link to before establishing such a list article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your efforts to keep wikipedia up-to-date. I'm doing the same since 2006 ! Anyhow since you are "ecologist dealing mostly with bird population dynamics and conservation ecology. I dabble in palaeontology and phylogenetics." I really appreciate if you actually contribute some content into page you just moved. Appreciate your contribution in advance ! User:Abune (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of botanical gardens in Honduras moved to draftspace

[edit]

Please don't create lists that consist primarily or entirely of redlinks. Wait until there are more than 50% existing articles to link to before establishing such a list article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your efforts to keep wikipedia up-to-date. I'm doing the same since 2006 ! Anyhow since you are "ecologist dealing mostly with bird population dynamics and conservation ecology. I dabble in palaeontology and phylogenetics." I really appreciate if you actually contribute some content into page you just moved. Appreciate your contribution in advance ! User:Abune (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No need to be passive-aggressive about it. We do have guidelines that ask editors not to put lists of mostly or all redlinks into mainspace, for the simple reason that they are of no use to the reader. Just publish it again once there are some pages to point to. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Botanical gardens in Honduras

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Botanical gardens in Honduras requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Abune

Thank you for creating Quito Botanical Garden.

User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

With articles where the subject's name is not in English, it's a very good idea to set up a redirect from the name in the original language. So that, for instance, if you're in Ecuador and you see the garden's signboard but don't speak Spanish well you can easily find the Wikipedia article. I've therefore redirected Jardín Botánico de Quito to this article and put that name in the article so it's easier to Google. Hope that makes sense!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Blythwood (talk) 04:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Botanic Garden of Latvia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mazan Ecological Foundation moved to draftspace

[edit]

I'm afraid the references provided don't demonstrated that the society is WP:NOTABLE enough in the Wikipedia sense to have an article - i.e., we need to demonstrate that multiple independent sources have written about it in detail. The sources currebtly provided are either not independent of the society, or don't constitute in-depth treatment. Can you have a look for newspaper or scholarly articles? These usually provide the best grounds for establishing notability. (University in-house publications can be considered to be at least partly promotional in character, and are not suitable for that - although facts can be sourced to these.) Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I had my own doubts about it too. However they got the initials of its herbarium AZUA. That's something not easy to get and it convinced me that they are for real. I can't find any more evidence of notability then this one. User:Abune (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(Sorry, that was kind of a "new editor" message - didn't check :) Hm. Is there some kind of precedent for assuming notability if in possession of an international herbarium denominator - e.g. via consensus at Botany wikiproject? One doesn't normally know about them unless active in the relevant project... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually each page has talk space to discuss matters like this one. I'm sorry but you took significant action - moved page to Draft without prior discussion. I'm not sure that's proper way to seek consensus on anything. User:Abune (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What I'm suggesting above is would be a special consensus that would allow publication of an article that under normal circumstances would not satisfy notability requirements. It is very much your (the author's) responsibility to make sure something like that exists - you can't just assume it. If you are not sure notability is satisfied, you should not have published the page, and it is definitely within new page review's remit to either draftify or AfD an article that does not meet notability requirements. Between "hoping it sticks despite dodgy sourcing" and "making sure it is suitable for mainspace before publishing", the preference should clearly be on the latter. - You are of course welcome to republish, but I'm not sure why you would prefer to have this sorted out at AfD rather than making sure beforehand. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you feel like doing this special consensus that would allow publication of an article with possession of an international herbarium denominator please do so !!! That will be real help !!! User:Abune (talk) 20:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi, re this edit. It's better to use {{ill}} template as it converts to a blue link once an article is created on English Wikipedia. Thanks, Renata (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Pyasino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. George Village Botanical Garden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tissue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One World Conservation Center moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, One World Conservation Center, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently it is only sourced by primary (or affiliated) sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mazan Ecological Foundation

[edit]

Hello, Abune. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mazan Ecological Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits that are not minor

[edit]

Information icon Hi Abune! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research moved to draftspace

[edit]

As discussed on my talk page, I've moved it to Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, in order for you to work on it at your leisure. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Kaņieris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skrīveri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A6.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birzgale Parish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurzeme.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ujarma fortress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dachi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Norio (village)
added links pointing to Round, Siba, Shout, Hawthorn, Zion Church and Smart

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghumurishi Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gali District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:One World Conservation Center

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Abune. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One World Conservation Center, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamani massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vandzene Manor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landscape park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ozolmuiža Manor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storehouse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Malta Golf Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marsa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One World Conservation Center has been accepted

[edit]
One World Conservation Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Alligator Point, Florida, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MOS:APPROPRIATEICONS Donald Albury 19:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alki Point, Seattle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Desert City moved to draftspace

[edit]

What's the idea here please? Not a single one of the general "sources" given has anything to say about this specific location - in fact they look to be dazzle. This is therefore functionally unreferenced, and should not be in mainspace in this state. Please make sure that there is sufficient referenceing for all the text. Translating an equally unreferenced version in another language (which you did not attribute BTW) is not a good motivation for this kind of thing. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sir ! Place got close to 5 stars (*****) at Desert City Tripadvisor. Travelers Choice 2021. Major tourist attraction up there. Including (this is my speculation of course !) English speaking folks ! It is not some obscure vacant Desert spot called city for no reason. But Sir ! you are absolutely entitled to change your mind any time ! Thank you Sir !!! User:Abune (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lancetilla Botanical Garden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bald Point, Florida for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bald Point, Florida, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bald Point, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Bagineti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kruševo Brdo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gradina and Javorje.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Desert City has been accepted

[edit]
Desert City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jyoti Roy (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prosjek, Prnjavor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prnjavor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ključ hatnote

[edit]

Hi, with regard to this edit, please read WP:NAMB. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kareri Lake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaddi and Chamba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gong River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historical and Geographic Museum of Campina Grande, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vila.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maja Zabel

[edit]

Did you notice that the recent edit at Maja Zabel gave two errors? Please fix that or revert. If you're not sure what to do, someone at WP:Teahouse would probably be able to provide information. Also, why did your edit at Small Korab remove {{coord missing|Albania}}? I don't see any coordinates in that article. Johnuniq (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gosaikunda

[edit]

What is your problem with connecting Gosaikunda and Silu? --Judithcomm (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a short paragraph about the connection, including references.--Judithcomm (talk) 09:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zenica

[edit]

Please check this diff /arch., alt. arch./ (maybe compare with other revisions after edit wars) before speedily reverting seemingly weird contrib. Thanks. --5.43.77.122 (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing cite in Barimo massacre

[edit]

The article cites "Institute for War & Peace Reporting & 9 November 2005" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata•3 01:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Dzhimara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lighthouse maps

[edit]

Hi Abune, I like what you are doing with the lighthouse maps, but I also feel that one map is sufficient in the infobox. Would you be able to make your changes to the map at the top of the infobox without adding a new one at the bottom? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your friendly suggestion. One map gives general overview while other provides location details and very (!) often indicates how off coordinates are. So on many occasions I also correct coordinates. From reader prospective this local map offers proof that coordinates are somewhat good. Hope you agree with my approach. User:Abune (talk) User:Abune (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do and I don't. I can see the advantages of a close-up but I don't think we can justify the space taken up by two maps in the infobox. I have seen some infoboxes with a radio button to choose the view. Is that something we could explore on Template talk:Infobox lighthouse? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd guess that decision must be made by team who created and support Template:Infobox lighthouse. I'm not really interested in redesigning Template itself but other people might be. It works for me either way. User:Abune (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding additional maps to infoboxes. The purpose of using a template is to create a consistent look across different articles. If you think this idea is worth pursuing, please take it to the template talk page. I believe that your current actions are undesirable. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sir ! I have ZERO interest in engaging into editors war. You wrote before: "I do and I don't. I can see the advantages of a close-up but I don't think we can justify the space taken up by two maps in the infobox." I on the contrary DO see usefulness of close-up maps. Like I wrote before many bogus coordinates has been discovered with these maps, easy justification ! Frankly you are so far THE fist and only editor who opposes my edits. I'm getting thanks for them, not often, but I do ! User:Abune (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I invite you to seek consensus for your changes, and request that you stop making them in the meantime — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I cannot afford lawyer who will argue my position for next TWO WEEKS or more !!! So you can act as you pleased ! For me this conversation is over ! User:Abune (talk) 13:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are still doing this, as of yesterday. If this continues I will request action at WP:ANI — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sir ! You are actively provoking editors war ! You did not elaborate on your objections to my edits. You did not provide rationale for your edits while I did ! Like I sad before you are free to act as you pleased, I personally have ZERO interest in editors war of any kind !!! User:Abune (talk) 13:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maps in infoboxes

[edit]

Hi, I saw you added embedded maps to the infoboxes of several French communes, e.g. Bernières-sur-Mer. However, {{Infobox French commune}} already has this feature, hidden under "Location of Bernières-sur-Mer" just above the map of France, so I'm going to remove them. Markussep Talk 13:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, is this still happening, despite my requests above? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your changes to several articles, which appended an extra map to the infobox. Several editors have asked you to stop doing this. An infobox does not need more than one location map, and your actions are becoming disruptive. Can you also stop adding NOTOC to articles. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sir ! You are actively provoking editors war ! Why should I follow your PERSONAL PREFERENCES ? Are you Wikipedia Editor in Chief ? Like I indicated earlier I have ZERO interest in editors wars winch is obviously not the case with you ! User:Abune (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have asked you to stop making these changes until you have consensus to do them. But you still keep doing it! Next time I will open a report at WP:AN — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sir ! Stop stalking my edits and stop threatening me with horrible consequences!!! Find something more productive to do !!! We did head disagreement about lighthouse info box and I attempted to discuss that issue with you ! However you quickly stopped any discussion and started on insisting of YOUR personal preferences ! Again ! I think there are Wikipedia rules against stalking and harassing people ! That’s what you do !!! Find better ways to spend your time online !!! User:Abune (talk) 00:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nishiyama Zoo

[edit]

I'm not sure why you placed two different mapframes in Nishiyama Zoo. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The idea is to help with Zoo geo location. One frame is for general orientation within urban conglomeration, another one is more detailed and supposed to show Zoo boundaries. Some Zoos has boundaries visualized with red contours, while others like Nishiyama Zoo do not have that feature implemented as of yet. Hopefully it will done in the future. User:Abune (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, at Golden Beach, Florida, you added a mapframe, but there were already two maps in the infobox. This is a fairly short article, and the infobox now occupies about 70 percent of the right side. If someone adds a photo, it would poke into the references. Can you see any problem with this? Thank you again. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This map is different from a picture map. It's interactive map and can be used to zoom in or out with one "click". The article is not protected from edits, so anyone can remove map if he or she feels strongly about "space taken".

My recommendation - keep it ! User:Abune (talk) 20:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking you these question because you've added these maps to hundreds of articles, and many of these additions did not appear to be an improvement. At Beverly Beach, Florida, you added a mapframe in addition to a pushpin map. There was no consensus to do this at Template talk:Infobox settlement/Archive 30, and MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE specifically states "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." At the Beverly Beach article, there are now three maps in the infobox of this very short article, and the population template has been pushed a mile below the end of the article. Could you please seek a consensus before adding mapframes to articles that don't need them. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Abune — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I never roll back my changes that someone else considered “not an improvement” and edit out.

You certainly welcome to do whatever you consider the best course of action ! User:Abune (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will you stop adding unnecessary mapframes, as illustrated above? Magnolia677 (talk) 09:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ” latest National Geographic-Roper survey sparked editorials in newspapers across the United States. The National Geographic Society polled 510 Americans ages eighteen to twenty-four and found that the majority of them don't know, in the broadest sense of the phrase, where they are. Most people cannot locate the places flashed before them on maps shown on TV news programs, even places of war and disaster. We don't know if younger students were polled, but you can take the test to assess your level of knowledge. You might do better!”

quote from Edutopia also check how many “Thank you” notes from Wikipedia users I got before labeling me as “disruptive user”. Simply admit that your judgment and actions were wrong ! It happens !!! 🫠 User:Abune (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sir, you obviously abusing power given to you as administrator ! Instead of seeking consensus you are blocking users because they disagree with you !!! And why 1 week block ? Why not 10 months ? Or better yet 1 year ? How about lifetime ban ??? You certainly have no idea what you are doing !!! User:Abune (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abune (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Minor [editorial disagreement] escalated into unilateral action by the same administrator ([block]). I've been editing Wikipedia since 2006 and have not seen such a blatant abuse of power by any administrator ! This is request for disciplinary action against user MSGJ for an inappropriate use of administrative privileges  ! User:Abune (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think calling this a "blatant abuse of power" is excessive. MSGJ requested input and review from uninvolved persons at ANI and received no reply in two and a half days. While waiting, your disruption continued. MSGJ (as all admins do) had a responsibility to prevent disruption to Wikipedia and cannot just allow it to continue. After blocking you (for only a week) they again requested review by others. Hardly the signs of someone deliberately abusing powers in my opinion. My opinion is not the last word, once the block has expired, you are free to contribute to the ANI discussion, or you can attempt to persuade another admin to remove the block early if you acknowledge your disruption. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abune: are you going to stop adding these maps as many editors have asked you?
Reviewing admin: please see thread on WP:AN — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sir if you'd like to discuss this matter further we certainly can do that ! However please use arguments related to actual edits and not to your likes and dislikes ! As I recall there has been objections in the past to introduction of Infoboxes per se, however that discussion is now over and Infoboxes do exist. Are they best they could be ? Absolutely not ! So we use what we got ! I myself have limited online time and even so (I think !) I have sufficient skills to contribute to Infoboxes design I'm not eager volunteer to do that. Just not my piece of cake. I'm not going to do any promises as to my future edits whatsoever, however if you give me good argument like "Hey, I'm going to assemble team to redesign such and such infoboxes, give us some time !" I'd certainly will give you every opportunity to do that ! If you can't argue your point in reasonable fashion and simply use your administrative powers to roll over user opinion all bets are off ! User:Abune (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terra Nostra Park moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Terra Nostra Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 09:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for voting.

If you wish, you may retain the following receipt as evidence of your vote:

SPID: 51774

BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

hQGMA8Wo2EpyHocMAQwAlBp4pJCV7VrlO/Va3EoAem1UcRbglJovWFlWKCgWKuHc TyUpL1wTOlEkkLWUGBQcpRZvK7HLMCB6Y7vYnE240sfDCOZDSclNGeyO4j7atuTx ua15GSTXvJQIhnb/RUOlQIzLmOz7O/dv99YMhAKW+ry6+yCj6ayqZ+w6B+ljZJ3f wVORqMXC7RZxss6EGUdlNerYwXBisoWDB4Lifc/3Em25DVsYwOVX4AnQ3saVDavx xLk6VVW3y086JrXMs4hg23cfOBsPmxFAXauES92njswpMkkI5mjgIYfmhSujOtfS W+dM2UZfsRyoicxqNvj2kTxXj85niZO3AkyITzy4g8sa7DdEUQgaBqaasNyGxpTi NgvZ0mew5G2pWQLu0hBSxWgbjHU9hL1596ggsAAlR+vQis+Kpv2DnPF0A0YKwfTI scfhdPSqkDdElWOWeuixOx5K8EwPk6fKf/yWAfBdgQQ6x3HCLmq93RvykLUw6rqa hODW+KconDEZ/DNVklMS0ukBtzfylRab6Zm6ZknzjIhW0g32H9kI9KZfwBRjzqsJ 6vY2yp0m+dH39Z2DCvaJuPQI6LiuQE6+zyWgYiU0rUXjV7spREcr4XxA10fw0NTq f4qnFHaOQhzNEpKhFf0SBvnqRS6lVPSGZN2mhjxUuOL6rRMdhsp5y7M6q/eo9a7E 5U46GoM+OtxswfaR0euX7Msi3ww++2bOhtxg7EIUW+e5nrMaX0RQI04sszBhaFLf J1HKWyhT9N4LQs1FXgTP0jPs72c598c1g7XxaliVSiN5aLkKFen9GbdEh2NqGC1/ 3xQ494QToK6dQih73CePL4SGKtFdIydKwaycBE65Gzc2xti0ZAt+pRj/CYQKgC+1 JKsKUTMLobauRhU+/tZBm6vDR9mfSfZj2/tFrEdsIMHXk+OtNMcd6F/5e1Qi91/I fNchbZdH/rLcsgCzIXXMviNush76Mr4lQhgdOYBgkY8EfPy65CDRDrhifp651i4J U3G6q9536aqV8Ou49bvw4yHVfZF0/YiQXghy1KEycaOSDOBVOquJXL5F/C5r0td2 FO49ow0Yg6cFzqmhLvV6vuvtIF2Mh5pl/lCvVy4l2igI6u0w5hb4LwuagBnOeQrX pROHlQ/achgtFvyi08AcwfyhqT1oAtpFlKhEjBBiBT5kbqY+q7RegywlMZnKsoVj ycDIq0N0xVmIZ0Trj/xECFA7FxYl/2+Z11CeWI4GwZthtTLxGSNwLqEfqGz80plG pK9lsy99aqvkDFZnu2P5OH90DLJ9OVf+v1uDM3r1hvL1xFckRiRcFxyNepWKbCv/ gSjlhx0H5nSFjpmJMLYN7K+Hg1DKeeATdFH/+Wicrn8DZ0lb0YQBHdJILhadJRzd wQvUgPa8GSb6s4lIIffyBevnVRRTG7JKKJPDSoOl1/mwBmZcHQ/OL5I4xN5JUye0 bkkrB1PXWBN7biSUV0/ty2E+0s7Kv9Tc2R1w4wVgEb/+1bou4Lin6x800SdtPJBF OoclZCgsaTKKSVftaLHkxkLhQ/szBqNtwpvhgrnnNOyoU5ucg+1M+1Nv+Jckr1P7 HlAawkpC/+i0PqcaZy33JJ/4UWzvTMmDL1AH0S44uou/9dhFbEoXX5IdR9dJlBg4 jxBfYqcVEW1dQIwsT33CNVi60tH6GZXE4jsUKgP+IuPR1t8XTqxLQqgYYq4IOvMW TyhFe91sneU8+9Q= =eRs0

END PGP MESSAGE-----

December 2022

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Terra Nostra Park has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir! Just want to clarify that basic information, such as size of the park, specific names of particular gardens, number of species, etc. shouldn't be removed from suspected copyrighted material.( see Parque Terra Nostra ) This is still a draft, not a final product ! Are you administrator at Wikipedia or just regular user like myself ? User:Abune (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. The text that I removed from that page was sufficiently creative and can't be copied to Wikipedia. When we talk about things below the threshold of originality, we're talking about things like lists of awards, proper nouns, and bibliographies. It's not okay to copy sentences verbatim and present them as original prose, even in draftspace. DanCherek (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarification and especially (!) thank you for not pretending that you are just a regular user ! This sets boundaries even in casual conversation ! I wish Wikipedia change it rules and it will be mandatory to all administrators to sign with clear indication as to who they are ! You will agree with me that you are not talking on the street in the same way with regular folk and with policeman ! Since you whipped out my text really clean ( I can’t even see the difference between my version that included description of one flower that I literally took from the source which I heavily referenced, the description that I should have quoted and that I believe triggered your actions. ) I will post extensive quotes from my source on talk page of the article so may be someone will be able identify which of two flowers that description fits. User:Abune (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terra Nostra Park has been accepted

[edit]
Terra Nostra Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Turnagra (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gomismta has been accepted

[edit]
Gomismta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whiteface Mountain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Placid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chikuma mountains moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Chikuma mountains, is not suitable as written to remain published. Simply showing that a place exists is not enough. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your efforts ! These mountains are in Japan, so English language sources are in short supply. Obviously there are plenty of citations in Japanese language. After all Japanese people for sure explored these mountains. We face however much more difficult situation in remote areas, such as Antarctica on Earth or mountains on Moon or Mars. Articles about these mountains, lakes, glaciers, etc has to be removed from Wikipedia based on WP:GNG ? Or there is double standard here ? What is good for Martian mountains is not good for mountains in Japan ? Pleases clarify your comment ! User:Abune (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question

[edit]

Why do you continually pushing the Mtianeti map over the Georgian map (diff1, diff2) but don't do the same with the Ossetia map over the Russian map in the case of the Dargavs? Country maps are more important than their subdivisions. Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 16:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Good question ! While for most countries (including Georgia !) this infobox: Infobox settlement is used In case of Russia different one is used: Infobox Russian rural locality. And that infobox for Russia has built in maps. So to change maps one has to redesign infobox itself. Too much for me ! Developers might do that if you ask them. User:Abune (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Natural Park moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Our Natural Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 TT me 16:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sturge Park

[edit]

Hi. You recently added Wikidata to the article in the form of a Wikimap location. Not sure how, but the Wikimap data is about 100 metres out from where the ground is currently location, but here on Wikidata the coordinate data looks correct, so no idea what's going on there. Any ideas?! StickyWicket (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is artifact created by parameter in Wikidata "Manual" with value "special (±0.00937943°)"
I unchecked "Manual" and now map location looks different with the same numeric value of coordinates. Let me know if Coordinates itself need correction.User:Abune (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. They still appear out on the article page. The centre of the cricket ground was located at 16.7144, -62.2250 (on your screen just north of the red marker you can still make out the ruins of the grandstand on satellite). StickyWicket (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing up-to-date coordinates. I put your rounded data 16°42'52"N 62°13'30"W into wikidata. Hope now it looks OK. I looked on Google terrain map and can see only greenery there. User:Abune (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, looks all accurate now to me. Nature has done a remarkable job of reclaiming the playing area over the last 26 years, from how it looked when it was a top-class venue. All the best, StickyWicket (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Illuminata, Massa Martana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for improving gusuku-related articles! ミラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 12:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ! I'm glad you liked my contribution ! I was banned from editing and now got "The Original Barnstar" for doing EXACTLY SAME THING !!! Life is full of surprises !
Thank you again, it lifts my spirit ! User:Abune (talk) User:Abune (talk) 13:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1260s establishments in Germany has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:1260s establishments in Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bosencheve National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lago Verde.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pommel horse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pommel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abune&oldid=1237942989"