User talk:AbhijitSonavane

Welcome!

Hello, AbhijitSonavane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sonavane Keshavrao Sitaram, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 15:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have modified the page :Draft:Keshavraoji Sonawane. please let me know if this page qualify to get to into article space? If no please specify specific area's of improvement in this article.

Deactivating this request as this helpee was helped on IRC which resulted in the article being moved to Draft:Keshavraoji Sonawane and cleaned of copyvios. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 13:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
AbhijitSonavane, the draft is looking good! You should try to find some sources for the last section about the bank, but otherwise I would say that it's ready for submission. Primefac (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keshavrao Sonawane has been accepted

Keshavrao Sonawane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 11:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, केशवराव सोनवणे

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, केशवराव सोनवणे. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Keshavrao Sonawane. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Keshavrao Sonawane – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 15:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have improved my Wiki Article Keshavrao Sonawane. Could please help me improve the grading of my article? How can I get better grade than start class?

Hello AbhijitSonavane. Assessing articles is not automatic, and it can take a long time before someone reassess them. You did the right thing by asking for a reassessment after improving it. Here is a rough scale about what it takes to meet certain assessment levels. I think the biggest problem with your article is that there is an entire section ("The Latur District Central Co-Op Bank Ltd. Latur") without sources. Where did you get this information from? Likewise, most of the section "The Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963" is unsourced. I've reasessed it as C-class, but sourcing needs to be improved for a higher rating. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbhijitSonavane. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Katie^talk 12:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AbhijitSonavane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I received mail from KrakatoaKatie that I am abusing users and I never did any abuse on wikipedia administrators. also as mentioned on my wiki page I have never created multiple accounts. why I am being blocked? please unblock me. AbhijitSonavane (talk) 14:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The violations of WP:SOCK are confirmed. You are welcome to request another unblock if you address your violations of our sockpuppetry policy. Yamla (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to address your violations of our sockpuppetry policy with respect to above request? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhijitSonavane (talk • contribs)

@Yamla: ^{(unblock request reviewing sysop)} @KrakatoaKatie: ^{(sock confirming CheckUser)} Confirmed sock, yet user denies creating multiple accounts. Forwarding Template:helpme request ^{(provisionally marked as helped)}. --JustBerry (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... How to address violations of sockpuppetry policy with respect to above request by Yamla?

AbhijitSonavane (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing with user on IRC. Helpme template is incorrect, anyway, as needs a CU to overturn the block at this point. Waggie (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been asked to take a look over your block and confusion regarding not being unblocked. With your conversation in the help channel today, I still have several concerns relating to unblocking you. The point of requesting unblock is to acknowledge you made a mistake in the first place. While you may have done that in the help channel, you did not do so in your original unblock request. With taking a look at your conversation and edits I am not willing to unblock you as I have the following concerns:

You have not read the guide to appealing blocks and you admitted in the help channel to not reading the sockpuppetry policy. How can we know you will follow our policies if you are unwilling to read them?
You haven't admitted in your unblock request that you did sock, nor listed all the accounts you used to do so.
You have not acknowledged that you have wasted community time by doing what you did.

If you address those, maybe at that point an unblock will be considered. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AbhijitSonavane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I agree I did sock. I have stopped doing sockpuppetry. I just want to come clean and make good contributions to wikipedia. after unblocking I intend to improve article Keshavrao Sonawane and take it to the Good article category by improving all its grammatical mistakes,confusing statements and fine tuning of POV statements. also I want to tell you that I did IP edits on Keshavrao Sonawane to improve it after you blocked me. but I was unaware that it is also kind of being sock. I will not do it anymore please unblock at least see my intentions. anyways you block me again If you find me doing anything wrong. I also would like to tell you I read thesockpuppetry policy and I also acknowledged that I have wasted community time by doing what I did! I am extremely sorry please forgive me this big blunder mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhijitSonavane (talk • contribs) 12:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have stopped doing sockpuppetry: No you haven't. Less than an hour before this request you created User:Chunnukabhai. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please process above unblock as I agree on 3 points asked by admin — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhijitSonavane (talk • contribs) 13:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An admin will review the unblock request sooner or later. — Sam Sailor 15:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You just created another sockpuppet -- ShaileshLahoti (talk · contribs) (now blocked and unblock on UTRS declined) to continue your agenda here. Please stop posting frivolous unblock notices or your talk page access will also be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 15:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]