User talk:Abdullah.khaled

Welcome!

Hello, Abdullah.khaled, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 00:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Hizb ut-Tahrir, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hizb ut-Tahrir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah.khaled (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Abdullah.khaled Alerts (0)[reply]

thank you

I will fix mistakes later

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WassimDoureihi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WassimDoureihi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdullah.khaled (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What was done is unfair, it doesn't provide legitimate evidences for sockpuppetry. Wassim and I may carry the same ideas, that's probably why you saw similarities in the editing style. But it's not a reason to block both of us. Instead, you have to look at the edits made, weigh them to Wikipedia standards and approve/revert accordingly. Clearly, I am affiliated with Hizb ut-Tahrir. I am making edits to clarify and explain what is hizb ut-Tahrir and what they're doing from an honest perspective. Instead of blocking me, I expect you to guide me, and help me with your edits to the article not reverting them and blocking me. Abdullah.khaled (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

the checkuser Confirmed finding indicates that there is technical confirmation that your accounts are connected and abuse of multiple accounts has occurred. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.