User talk:Abbeysegun26

Welcome!

Hi Abbeysegun26! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you i need your help my account have more than 10 edits and is over four days, so i created an article on sandbox but i cant find move on my dashboard to move to main page on wikipedia, can you help me out Abbeysegun26 (talk) 12:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is only two days old, not four. Furthermore, unless you are highly experienced, you should not directly create articles and instead submit them for review, I've provided the information for you to do so.

Lastly, you took a professional image of this person and he posed for you. You must disclose your relationship with him, see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject gave right to use the image and I have uploaded letting Wikipedia aware of it. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But this article I published is on my sandbox yet can I send you the link to the article to see Abbeysegun26 (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the link and the subject has other sources and citiations to back this up User:Abbeysegun26/sandbox Abbeysegun26 (talk) 14:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must immediately request deletion of the image, which you are falsely claiming as your own work and putting this entire project in jeopardy. You must also immediately comply with the conflict of interest policy and formally disclose your relationship with this individual. If you work for him, the Wikipedia Terms of Use require you to disclose that, see the paid editing policy.

I have already seen your draft, you may submit is as the box at the top describes, but it is likely to be rejected quickly as highly promotional. You have not shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is on other sources like wikialpha, crunchbase, I will add this sources thank you for letting me know this 102.88.33.86 (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only considers the text and sources. It is not necessary to have an image yet, but if you want one, the easiest thing to do would be to have the photographer upload the image(or the copyright holder if not the photographer). 331dot (talk) 16:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not related to the subject I am not person on the article, 102.88.33.86 (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to log in when posting. You must disclose your relationship with him. You also have not yet requested deletion of the image. If your next edit is anything other than you declaring your relationship with this musician, you will be blocked. 331dot (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is just a producer that I listened to his song and I decided to do more research about him and I decided I should put up an article about him on Wikipedia, because the song he did really moved me Abbeysegun26 (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I declare my relationship with him because I am not related to the subject Abbeysegun26 (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said that Mr. Jatto gave you the right to use his image, so you either know him or communicated with him. 331dot (talk) 22:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reached out to him on his page where I was able to chat him up and he sent me a picture himself and said I should use it and I am free to use it for the sake of the article. 102.89.34.161 (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ive received your email and you should stop trying to publish the article (other than submitting through AfC) as you clearly have a COI concern here. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 00:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no conflict of interest because I reached out to him 102.89.34.237 (talk) 10:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, remember to log in when posting. That is absolutely a conflict of interest. Articles are typically written without any involvement from the subject. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked for a picture only if I can use for my work but he wasn’t aware of the article writing so what should I do now Abbeysegun26 (talk) 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to disclose the conflict of interest now, and go to Commons and request deletion of the image that you are still falsely claiming as your own work now.

As I said above, images are not relevant to the draft approval process. Once you submit the draft for review and if it is accepted, you may then worry about images. 331dot (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but i already told this article i am not related to the subject in anyway, and he has given me the right to use the image he sent to me, can i send you proof of it, how can i delete an image that i was given free rights to use and while uploading the image i told Wikipedia about the rights because i was asked and i stated it there. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how the copyright holder upload the image himself then Abbeysegun26 (talk) 05:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been marked as needing evidence of permission. That will need to be something on his personal website releasing the image, or a formal declaration of consent by the copyright holder(which usually isn't the person depicted in the image), allowing use of the image by anyone for any purpose with attribution. If you have or can get that, follow the instructions provided on the image page at Commons. It will need to be more than just a "yeah, you can use it" via email or Twitter/X.

You do have an association with this person- you contacted them about what you were doing here(to get an image). If you don't want to have to declare a conflict of interest, you shouldn't contact the subjects of your edits. If your next edit is anything other than declaring your conflict of interest(see WP:COI for instructions) you will be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author and photographer have declared their consent on the image that required a permission 102.88.70.40 (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in. Now the other thing you need to do is declare your conflict of interest; I will post instructions below. This should be the next thing you do. 331dot (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you declared the COI, thank you; I see that you posted the permission received for the image, but you still claim it as your own personal work- you need to change that on Commons to indicate whom actually took it. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abbeysegun26. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your support and I have learnt from it, I have just declared my conflict of interest. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you attempted to do so, but you (probably inadvertently) have coding in place to prevent proper display of the notice. It should also be on your user page(User:Abbeysegun26). As a courtesy I will place it there for you. Thanks 331dot (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me out, I have really learnt from you 102.89.22.214 (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GODSTIME Martins Jatto moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to GODSTIME Martins Jatto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal note about COI and my recent draftification of your article

Hi Abbeysegun26. I wanted to leave you a note explaining my recent draftification of GODSTIME Martins Jatto in addition to the template left above. Because you have declared a COI, the article is required to be revised by a third party at the WP:AfC process. In addition, there are numerous issues with your article including the use of WP:BAREURLS and WP:EXTERNAL LINKS in text, as well as general WP:NPOV concerns. These will need to be address before the article can be accepted.

If you have additional questions, you can ask at the WP:Tea house or ping me using the {{ping}} template and include {{ping|MicrobiologyMarcus}} in your reply.

Thanks, microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GODSTIME Martins Jatto moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to GODSTIME Martins Jatto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, Abbeysegun26, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not coordinating account with anyone Abbeysegun26 (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the other account is yours(as you responded to a question there with this account), I have blocked it as a sockpuppet, and blocked this account for a week. You should only be using a single account. 331dot (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a sock puppet

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abbeysegun26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was blocked for abuse filter and it was because I wanted to add the subject I was working on to a wiki source because my article was rejected I never knew it will go that way, I did not have it mind to go against Wikipedia policy because I know multiple account are allowed so I was blocked because I was trying to edit it for several times which was because of my server error which I did not so I plead to be unlocked thank you it won’t repeat itself

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for an abuse filter hit. You were blocked because you used User:"Icon240$%" in a manner that violated Wikipedia's policy on using multiple accounts. I'm not sure what a server error has to do with your block. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abbeysegun26 (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked for abuse filter was it not on wiki news would I be saying what I did not see, the message sent to me was blocked for abuse filter Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new comments below. This message makes no sense. You are blocked for using a second account inappropriately. 331dot (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The server error is from where I leave the internet supply is not that strong when my article was on speedy deleted I tried to edit not knowing that I have tried it several times not knowing my connection went off and went on again Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A server or internet problem did not cause you to use a second account- and on your second account you did not identify yourself as having used this account, making it seem like you were a different person. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you were blocked on Wikinews for an abuse filter, but that is a separate issue that you will have to take up with Wikinews. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not use a second account I only use that username to open an account on wiki news I don’t know about this second account of a thing Abbeysegun26 (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know about any second account I only created an account on wiki news Abbeysegun26 (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That just doesn't make sense. You responded to a post on User talk:"Icon240$%" as if it was you. You'll need to explain in a new unblock request why you did that. 331dot (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the page you will see it doesn’t exist I don’t know about that page I was even shocked when you made mentioned of it Abbeysegun26 (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account made the edit to that page. Are you saying you didn't? 331dot (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I didn’t Abbeysegun26 (talk) 23:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you didn't make that edit from this account, that means that someone else did, so that person must have gained access to your account; that requires me to block it as compromised. See WP:COMPROMISED for more information. 331dot (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t block it as compromise I was able to check it today and noticed I did it out of not reading the instructions below Abbeysegun26 (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=the block is no longer necessary because i understand what I am blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead;:

);}} Abbeysegun26 (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is globally locked, contact ca

wikimedia.org for assistance. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.331dot (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abbeysegun26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

after you told me this I went to check my browsing history and noticed that you were right but I never intended to use it for any illegitimate reasons I did not know when I did not read the instructions fully before I proceeded in adding my username and password, I took it for another thing i am sorry.

Decline reason:

In that case, you should remain blocked for sockpuppetry and promotional editing. Spicy (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abbeysegun26 (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #85321 is closed.

What Spicy said. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you are using some predictive algorithm AI to write unblock requests, they never get it right. First we laugh, then we decline. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abbeysegun26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did create another Wikipedia account but I made a mistake by taking the former account for the new account meaning I did not properly check the username of which one I was working on at that moment, which caused a compromised account, I regret this account and won't do it again. thank you i plead for clemency Abbeysegun26 (talk) 09:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is nonsense. This would not cause an account to be compromised. Yamla (talk) 13:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to remove the nowiki tags surrounding your request if you want it to be seen. That's also not the reason this account is compromised, you said someone else operated it. 331dot (talk) 18:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say someone else operated it, I did opened the account because I know about the username icon240 be used because I use that username for some accounts apart from wikipedia 102.88.36.35 (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me remove the no wiki tags, I sincerely regret my action 102.88.36.35 (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Log in when posting. 331dot (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say someone else operated it, I did opened the account because I know about the username icon240 be used because I use that username for some accounts apart from wikipedia, please help me remove the no wiki tags, I sincerely regret my action Abbeysegun26 (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

331dot made my account compromised I did not create another account to violate wikipedia policies, how I came about a compromised account was one of the administrators saying I said I did not create an account I created an account and I know the username, i never said someone else operated the account, Abbeysegun26 (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1= My block is incorrect or I am been taken for another user, I created another wikipedia account and it was never created by another person and I know the username for that account, one administrator here once told me here that I did suckpuppet which I did not and all of a sudden I just saw my account blocked after I know about the account creation, does Wikipedia now block for an account create by the right user, the username for the account created is Icon240$% so that you know that I am aware of this account I am been accused of.~~~~}}

. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted Wikimedia Foundation and I was asked to tell the administrator to unblock me

page: {{unblock|1=I contacted Wikimedia foundation about my block and they told me to tell the administrator to unblock me here is the message I got Tom Paine (Wikimedia Trust & Safety / Legal)

Feb 28, 2024, 00:15 PST

Hello Emmanuel Abbey,

Thank you for reaching out to us. We are sorry to hear of the situation.

As we have no way to verify the ownership of your account we are unable to lift the block. However, as you have mentioned, this also doesn't look like a compromised situation.

If you wish to have your block appealed, you are advised to follow the appropriate community process.

Best regards,

Trust & Safety Team

Wikimedia Foundation ~~~~}} Abbeysegun26 (talk) 08:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have a lot of junk coding in this which prevents proper display. I would fix it, but there is nothing to this request other than the email. You need to make a new unblock request where you explain why this account is not compromised, your use of other accounts, what was wrong with your edits, and what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback do you mean what I will Edit about in the future or what? Abbeysegun26 (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbeysegun26 (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's how it works. Trust and safety need to post here confirming this. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have received email from T&S saying they found no indication of compromise in the server logs and referring to Community processes. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir Abbeysegun26 (talk) 13:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My account is still blocked Abbeysegun26 (talk) 10:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please be patient while waiting for a volunteer to review your request. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Abbeysegun26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, My account was not been compromised because the administrator who blocked me said I said I was not the one that created the account In question and I was the one that opened that account he made a mistake of not understanding what I said to him, the username of the account is abbeysegun26 please I want my account to be unblocked. The use of the other account is not to violate wikipedia purposes but it is been known by users that wikipedia supports multiple accounts which is what I just created that account for, what was wrong with my last edit was that I was told the article I was creating about has not shown enough reasons for it to be notable and show worthiness and what I will edit about is articles of notable people that have won accolades, awards and high profile people that have contributed to my community, state and region. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

per discussion below Girth Summit _(blether) 08:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to remove the "code" and "nowiki" tags you have around your request, this is preventing proper display. You may need to use the source editor to do this. 331dot (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me remove it’s not loading sourcing editor on mobile and I’m not close to my laptop now Abbeysegun26 (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think you're going to fool anyone with this drivel?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raul Morar III (talk • contribs) 15:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your interest here? There isn't usually a need for non-admins to comment on an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stay out of it if you'd prefer 331dot, but users lole this really make my blood boil. They just waste everyone's time when they know full well they don't stand a chance at getting unblocked. Raul Morar III (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is a particular need for you to comment on an unblock request, it usually just "kicks the bear" unnecessarily- especially with comments such as the one you made. Unless you are trying to assist a user with getting unblocked, or something about a situation pertains to you, my advice would be to stay out. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hear! Hear! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:This is hard for me to understand, but the original 1 week block would have expired by now. OK to unblock with one account restriction? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy for you to proceed as you see fit, thanks for asking. 331dot (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for showing concern and interest Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right It is over one week and I am still blocked Abbeysegun26 (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll endorse this as well. Fundamentally they look like a new user who was editing subjects they are interested in with a positive slant and they ended up being railroaded a bit. Seems there has been a lot of confusion and misunderstanding and the situation has been largely overblown because of it. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the discussion above, it looks like there isn't any opposition to an unblock at this point. Abbeysegun26, will you accept a one-account restriction going forward if I unblock your account now? In other words, you would undertake to do all your editing from this account, and not to create any more. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I, Abbeysegun26, accept the one-account restriction. If my account is unblocked, I undertake to do all my editing from this account and not create any additional accounts or engage in sockpuppetry. Abbeysegun26 (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm going to unblock. The editing restriction is recorded at Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions/Voluntary. Note that 'voluntary' does not mean that following the restriction is voluntary, it means that you entered into it voluntarily as a condition of unblock (as opposed to restrictions which are imposed on people by community consensus or other mechanisms). The exact text of the restriction is as follows: As a condition of unblock, Abbeysegun26 is subject to an indefinite one-account restriction. They may not edit Wikipedia under any other account, or while logged out. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I understand Abbeysegun26 (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto

Hello, Abbeysegun26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GODSTIME Martins Jatto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]