User talk:Aarem/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Aarem. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
File:Primesourcing.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Primesourcing.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
infobox edits
Hello Rajith,
The issue with your edits is, that there is no reference about the anglicisation of these names. So please don't revert it again.--Stopthenonsense (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerala FAR
I have nominated Kerala for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Stopthenonsense (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Now Commons
File:KU 2.jpg, an image uploaded from this account in August 2006 (log), was transferred to commons as File:Kerala University.jpg (Commons:File:Kerala University.jpg) by Roland zh. — Athaenara ✉ 14:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Tvm Central - Travancore.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tvm Central - Travancore.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Black Kite 11:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello about Thiruvanathapuram
Hello Sir, I have understood after viewing your posts that you contribute to Thiruvanathapuram based artciles.Thiruvanathapuram district is not 2nd largest in keral(i corrected)ts 10th largest. ie, its one of the smallest ditrict in kerala. However it has highest population density after alapapuzha
view this website http://cyberjournalist.org.in/census/dtpop91.html (its outdated. now density very high)
tk kumar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.244.169.30 (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mr.Kumar, The population is the primary measurement when talking about the largest/smallest places. In the article it is mentioned that Thiruvanananthapuram is the second largest district in Kerala; because its population is the second largest in the state after Malappuram.
Thanks for your suggestions. Please opt to create an account in wikipedia to continue with your contributions. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 08:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Thovala
A tag has been placed on Thovala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BejinhanTalk 04:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- I am removing the speedy deletion tag - It was meant to be a redirect. My fault, that I clicked "Internal link" button instead of "Redirect". Sorry for that. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 04:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, good. BejinhanTalk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Glorify Kochi?????
Mr Rajith Mohan, I do not know who you are and where you are from, but i know one thing. You do not know the history of Kochi and its surrounding areas. Otherwise you would not say that details about Kochi is glorified. Kochi is one city (if you include old Muziris in Kochi as the rulers of both the cities where same and both lay in 20kms range) that has the oldest history recorded in ancient south India. There is no need of Glorification of Cochin, already Kochi is glorified. I understand that you want to show Trivandrum as the best city of Kerala. I have no regrets. But what is in history should stay in history and should be mentioned. If you want to have adebate on Kochi and its history, let us do so, either by email or in person.
I have no hard feelings and i have nothing against you. I always want to support the Truth.
Cheers... Kerala Varma —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keralavarma (talk • contribs) 04:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Thanks for the message in talk page. I did not try to glorify or de-glorify any places. First you should understand why I reverted the changes done by Gantlet. Kochi is a featured article. The details included in the article were approved by the editors after much discussions (You can find the details in the talk page archives). Including more pictures in to each section will make it not only messy, but also will cause a slow download with low-speed connections.
- There are already 3 pictures in the economy section. What is the need in adding one more picture to the section? Also adding 2 more to the demographics section, which is already squeezed with pictures, make no sense.
- I dont possess any prejuidice against any thing. Please discuss before you make further changes, and we can reach a consensus. Happy editing :-) Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 04:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I've edited the population and the UA part in the first para. Please don't revert back the additional pics & information regarding the city, which I've posted. --Gantlet
- Your pictures are removed from the article because it doesnot possess a valid license, and is deleted as of now. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan
NPOV
Hi. Thanks for your edit on the BKWSU article. I appreciate the intention was to make the statement NPOV but using the words, "it has been claimed..." is problematic as it infers doubt WP:CLAIM. As a possible solution in this case, I suggest attributing the statement to the reference with a statement like, "According to Lawrence Babb, in the early days...".
I can't make changes to the article myself for WP:COI reasons. So would appreciate your help in improving the article if you are in agreement.
Thanks & regards Bksimonb (talk) 12:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi there. Even better ... rather be used by one of the cult members to do their organizations' whitewashing for them. Try reading some of the sources given on the topic.
- You will discover that it is all widely recorded and publicized, even by the sect themselves. Thank you. --Dadi says, be accurate too (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- FYI. The comment above was made by a user indef blocked for massive trolling, harassment and disruption. An old friend of mine, unfortunately. Bksimonb (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Bksimonb , Since this is about a spiritual organisation, there will be obviously blind followers who always tries to decorate the article. I would be glad to help in the improvement of the article. Unfortunately, I lack the subject expertise. Anyways, I will try to do basic copy-edits and will try to neutralise the tone of the article. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 09:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Rajith,
- You did do the right thing in that the article can't make an outright statement that anyone did have a vision since it is a subjective experience. It is, however, widely reported in the sources that many followers reported visions in the early days of the organisation. Would you be happy with replacing "it has been claimed..." with "it has been reported..."?
- I also see that there are other similar problematic statements such as ,"Its mediums also directly channel a messages from deceased senior Brahma Kumaris leaders". So Wikipedia believes in channelling? If you look at the reference how much does the quoted text relate to the statement being made in the article? There seems to be some WP:SYNTH going on.
- You are also correct that there is a risk of blind followers wanting to decorate articles about their beliefs and organisations. Please understand that I personally have no desire to do that. I really appreciated your efforts to improve the article.
- Thanks & regards, Bksimonb (talk) 10:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Just to clarify Rajithmohan, User:Bksimonb - ( as in Brahma Kumari Simon b) is a deeply involved adherent of this sect who has spent years attempting a clear, honest and well referenced documentation of the sect and has been involved in legal actions suppression open discussion of the Brahma Kumari sect.
- His manipulation of yourself, and persistent attempt at discrediting the topic by placing a huge tag at the top of it, is just another episode in several years worth of attempts by the sect to gain control of the Wikipedia page and discredit other non-adherent editors.
- Thank you. --The Murli says, be accurate (talk) 16:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like my friend is back again. The question has to be asked why someone goes to such lengths to repeatedly evade an effective ban to wiki-stalk and harass anyone who goes near the article he thinks he still WP:OWNS. FYI I've addressed most of his daft claims on my user page and blog. Apologies for the drama on your talk page. Bksimonb (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Edit war between users : Shrieekk and Dewatchdog
please send same message to your friends who try to hide facts in kochi article. Or somebody can do it on other articles also like 'TRIVANDRUM".We have put facts only. somebody else try to hide it and you support them ! We have not done anything on Trivandrum page. we edited kochi page only. We can not put facts on our city page? if it is not solved decently, we will contact administrators. regards shrieekk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrieekk (talk • contribs) 06:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have given the warning to both the parties who were involved in the edit war (not only to you). This is an encyclopedia, and not a place to glorify "your city" or "my city". Before editing the article, it would be good if you read the basic policies of wiki. Having said that, I request you to stop the edit war on the article. You can discuss your part in the talk page of the article for acquiring consensus. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 06:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
It is the user called shrieekk from oman who is doing the edit war. I am just reverting his disruptive edits. Being an admin, please block him. Thank you, --Dewatchdog (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I am from Oman and more accurately I am from Muscat.I have put facts only.They are need to be put back who deleted it.Kochi is the corporation with highest dencity of population in kerala. so what is wrong with it? why did you delete it? regards shrieekk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrieekk (talk • contribs) 07:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Kindly block the user Dewatchdog. He is deleting the facts which I added to the article, Kochi. Regards Shrieekk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrieekk (talk • contribs) 07:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Mr. (or Mrs? )Shrieekk, The infobox already states about the "dencity" (as you said). Adding it again in the article means you want to state that your city is first in some thing. If you blindly love your city, please dont take it here, and use wiki to propagate your love. If I can track your location (muscat, oman), i can track your company too. And I can report to your company about using company work time to vandalise wiki. Count on it. --Dewatchdog (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok, then population also given in infobox. then why "largest " and "second largest" etc should be given?Also some statements like "most populous city" etc in the article "trivandrum" can be removed? It is ofcourse notable thing that Kochi having highest dencity of population. Why cant you tolarate this statement? And dont try to THREATEN other users.It is my time and I would decide how to use it.Please discuss about the article. Not about personal things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrieekk (talk • contribs) 09:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Shrieekk and Dewatchdog,
Please dont use my talk page for discussions/messages between you. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 11:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Hai...Malayalam related articles need a boost....
I just accidently fumbled to our page...I also saw u contribution to Kerala related articles.....and also saw that u r ready for anything....So i was thinking wether u will help me in developing Malaalam related articles....ie articles such as Malayalam, which is way behind of many language articles in standard such as Tamil,Kannada etc..... We need an active wikipedia group for this purpose... So awaiting ur reply.....
ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 07:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hi ARUNKUMAR P.R, Nice to hear from you. I would be surely happy to help in improving articles related to Malayalam. I will create a sub section under WikiProject Kerala, if you feel that we need to form a group for this. Please let me know your plans. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 07:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Pls see this article- Tadiandamol....This is a peak in Kodagu, Karnataka......The name of the peak has malayalam origin....So pls check out the etymology of the name.....Also...Malayalam language article needs a section that specify its old script and lost archaic letters.....Pls do help me......As in Kasaragod, i hav only little resources....
tc.. ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 05:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Your edit of wiki Loan_words_in_Malayalam on 04:10, 16 December 2008
Can you please explain your edit of Loan_words_in_Malayalam on 04:10, 16 December 2008 Rajithmohan (talk | contribs) (2,637 bytes) (→Portuguese: varanda is sanskrit). As per what I understand, the English word Veranda originated from the Hindi word which was based on the Portuguese word Veranda. Please refer [1] for this info.
Can you confirm which Sanskrit word is varanda originally derived from? If a Sanskrit word already existed, then how come Hindi word is based on Portuguese?
Kindly clarify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.102.242 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- The word Veranda went to English from the Indian languages including Hindi, Malayalam etc. Many linguistics says that the Indian languages adopted this word from Portugese. Its also said that the Sanskrit word Varandaka was the root word for the Portugese Beranda also. Please check the book Goa and Portugal: their cultural links By Charles J. Borges, Helmut Feldmann (ISBN: 8170226597, 9788170226598). Its also claimed that the root word is not Sanskrit, but Persian (barāmadah) (C. Defréméry, in Revue Critique, 1869, 1st Sem.p.64.). Malay language/Old Malay, which has Sanskrit influence on it also have the word Beranda. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 05:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Trivandrum
I have nominated Category:Trivandrum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to a different name. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rajithmohan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- T. K. Rajeev Kumar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out. References are now added in the lead of the article, and the BLP tag is removed. I will try to provide more citations for the sub sections later. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 10:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Please see the changes in the article and the comments in the Talk page. Chaipau (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Malayalam films of 2007
Thank you for your excellent articles like this one; it's excellent to see contributions to an area we don't have much on. However, all articles on Wikipedia have to reference reliable sources. Could you please reference all the articles you've written? Feel free to contact me on my talkpage if you need help. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you for pointing out. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 11:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Brilliant, thanks. You might want to use a more modern form of tabling as used here; it looks nicer, imo. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Emblem Travancore Brigade
I am looking for the emblem of the Travancore Nair Brigade. Can you help me. i need a good resolution picture of the emblem.
Ravi Chowdhury —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.210.95 (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Ravi, Sorry; I am not having the emblem of the Nair Brigade now. I will try to obtain it by April end(when I visit Thiruvananthapuram). Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 10:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Biggest Hit of 2007 : Malayalam films
Hi,
I have edited the 2007 biggest hit based on a valid reference. If you want to "undo" it please produce a better reference link...
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chengroop (talk • contribs) 10:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your time to edit the wiki articles. Please make sure that the links you provide is always valid and conveys the citation claim completely. The link you provided to cite the biggest Malayalam movie hit of 2000s is not fully true. The link : http://www.malayalamcinema.com/News-24/ONAM+RELEASE+2007.html?newsid=228&linkid=24 says only about Onam releases and doesnt have a complete analysis of the hits in the year. Please feel free to drop me a message in case you need more clarification. Thanks, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 10:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for the message.Mayavi was released in February 2007. Hallo was released later (July).The link which I have given was an update up to August,2007. Here it is clear that Mayavi was not the biggest hit as you claimed. So please do not list Mayavi as the biggest hit of 2007, till you get a proven link to substantiate your claim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chengroop (talk • contribs) 11:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I am not claiming any thing, but just reflecting what other citations are telling. I have provided two valid links in the article itself. One: India Glitz Hit chart and Two: Web India Hit Chart. You can even check other authenticate sites like sify movies or rediff movies too. Here in wiki, we need to arrive at a consensus after checking different opinions, as different sites may quote different lists. So, going by the median average, Mayavi is the biggest hit of the year 2007. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 11:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
The links you have provided are from sites like indiaglitz.com and webindia123.com which are not reliable sources. As you mentioned consensus should be reached but not by depending on unreliable sources. Hindu, a respected newspaper should not be wrong. This data is again till Onam, but then, that is enough to show that Hallo is a bigger hot than Mayavi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chengroop (talk • contribs) 11:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Indiaglitz and such sites are the only movie related sites available in the web to refer about Indian films. The Hindu report is not complete, as it is more about Onam releases. Where as, the links i provided talks about the gross collection of films released in 2007. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 09:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Please help
Hello,
I am blocked saying that I am a sock user of usr:rajithmohan. Please help me in proving that I am not. Since they think that I am your sock user, I think you can help me in this matter. Since I am very new to wikipedia, I failed to understand some of the policies, and I am learning from my mistakes. I will be more constructive in my edits and will be positive towards other editors. Kindly help me in lifting the block. Thanks a lot, Dewatchdog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.12.234 (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
KITEC
Hello Rajith! I only now noticed that Kochi International Trade and Exhibition Centre was put through AFD. I was a little surprised that you put it forward as a hoax. The details of the building had come in almost all major Malayalam newspapers, and the initial rendering is also there in Zoom developers' annual report. Will have to search the archives of KochiNow for it, but it is the same as that shown here. It was also put through environmental ministry's sanction, where the 100 floors are clearly mentioned. I'm unsure about the current status or about the notability of the building as such, but it was certainly not a hoax.--thunderboltz(TALK) 18:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
File:Tvpm taluks.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tvpm taluks.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Move request
Your recent move request was mishandled, since you do not need to add it to the requested moves page, the bot will do this automatically. PatGallacher (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Thank You
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
I am giving you this Barnstar because you selflessly extended a helping hand to me. You encouraged me to do more edits in Wikipedia. Thank You. BINOY Talk 14:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks Binoy, for the barnstar. It is my pleasure to help you here. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 04:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated List of most populous cities in South India, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most populous cities in South India. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong confabulate 22:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Suggestion for a new photo of trivandrum
I sadly can't understand the method or way to upload a photo into a wikipedia article , plus I also don't know how to check whether the following pic of trivandrum is copyrighted .As I think that the main pic of trivandrum is not so 'cool' , I have pasted some links [having good pics ] which you may please see and try to upload if you like it . [btw , I am a resident of trivandrum ] .
LINK 1 : http://www.meriyatrra.com/photos/images/thiruvananthapuram--trivandrum_3.jpg LINK 2 : http://i29.tinypic.com/2lt1rna.jpg LINK 3 : http://img114.imageshack.us/i/10016330be.jpg/ Jsgenius (talk) 05:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
Trivandrum UA
Hello Rejith,
Why u continously undoing my edits about Trivandrum UA? Actually it is the second largest UA in kerala. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bijuts (talk • contribs) 10:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Your edits were on the city page of Trivandrum and mentioning that Trivandrum UA is the second largest in the state is suited in Trivandrum UA page. -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 07:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Aarem. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |