Jump to content

User talk:Aafi/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Autopatrolled granted

Hi AaqibAnjum, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 23:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Beeblebrox for granting me auto patrolled right. However, my User Rights don't show that I've been added to Autopatrolled users group. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 00:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
That's weird, I must've forgotten to save or something.  Fixed. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Yasir Akhtar issue

Dear Aaqib,

Hope you are well. I have just read your message that by mistake I have removed something from your account. I am sorry but I didn't remove anything. If I have made a mistake, I am extremely sorry. I am making corrections in the draft. Still working on it but I can't figure put why the main profile image box is unbalanced and there is more space on the left hand side on the image box. Also, the info box is really confusing. I can't figure out. Please help.

Kindest regards, Ayesha Mallik (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Canvassed

Earlier today I placed a "canvassed template" on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarika-e-Maizbhandari, complete with diff.[1] . The canvasser referred to Tarika-e-Maizbhabdari, which looks like a typographical error for Tarika-e-Maizbhandari. If you think that my placing that label was unfair, I do not mind if you remove it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear @Toddy1:, Page Log for Tarika-e-Maizbhabdari says that 11:28, 4 May 2020 Obaid Raza created page Tarika-e-Maizbhabdari (←Redirected page to Tarika-e-Maizbhandari). Maizbhandariya had posted him message on 05:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC) and he voted on the AfD on 06:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC). Canvassing is crystal clear. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


Request

Hi dear Aaqib, as I am working to improve my Draft:Amjad Saqib for re-submission, would request you to please help me know how to raise unprotection request to lift block for page creation. will deeply appreciate. Thanks Jugni (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Jugni, made some changes in the draft and left a message to the admin who had protected it. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Urdu title question

Assalamu alaikum, I thought you might know the answer to this since your Urdu is better than mine:

I am working on a userspace draft for the Pakistani drama serial Wujood-e-Laraib. I am wondering whether the second part of this name would be written as two separate words (لا ریب), since this is the spelling used in Qur'an 2:2, or as one word (لاریب), which is what appears to be indicated by both the pronunciation and romanisation?

Jazak Allah khair, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 18:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

M Imtiaz Wa Alykumus salam Wa rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh. Dear brother, I prefer using Larayb. However, the serial is named as Wujood-e-Laraib, no issues. Its fine. As far as Urdu title is concerned Rekhta has used لا ریب, space in between. [1] However, a short note that it is an Arabic word and both spellings may be used in Urdu title. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Excellent! Have a blessed rest of your Ramadan, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 18:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ meaning of laa-raib at Rekhta

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

WikiProject India Hello Aafi. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: 
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (talk • work) 11:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Ismail ibn Musa Menk

Assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. Can you please look at the behaviour of the editor who continues to rm a well-referenced point that obviously offends him or her. Thanks so much. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

GorgeCustersSabre Wa Alykumus salam. Sad to see that, I was sleeping. Requested protection for the page. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Be noted: you have my respect. Regards — Hammad (Talk!) 02:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
@Hammad: Nice to know that. Thanks - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 12:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the Khyber Pass

The Khyber Pass has long been one of the most important trade routes and strategic military locations in the world. Nestled in the mountains that divide present day Pakistan and Afghanistan, it forms the bridge between Central and South Asia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.36.28 (talk • contribs)

@92.41.36.28: I would highly appreciate if you provide any context of your message? - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

The development objective Khyber Pass Economic Corridor (KPEC) Project for Pakistan aims to expand economic activity solely between Islamabad and Kabul by improving regional connectivity and promoting private sector development along the Khyber Pass corridor. This project has three components.

1) The first component, Expressway Development, finance the detailed design, construction and supervision of the proposed four-lane PTEX and associated road-user and administrative infrastructure facilities, the laying of fibre optic cables in trenches along PTEX, land acquisition and resettlement, afforestation along PTEX, and technical and independent reviews and studies for the preparation of new projects.

2) The second component, Development of the Khyber Pass Economic Corridor, has the following subcomponents:

(i) Technical assistance; and (ii) Infrastructure investments and institutional improvements to promote the integration of local producers into global value chains.

3) The third component, Project Management, is a lending instrument to finance the project.

The Khyber Pass is the pass that connects Pakistan with Afghanistan. It is about 33 miles (53 km) long, traveling through the mountain range of the Hindu Kush. The pass reaches a maximum elevation of roughly 3,500 feet (1050 m), just at the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Once in the pass, it is incredibly difficult to climb the mountains to either side. In some rare places the faces become climbable, but generally are sheer cliffs ranging from 575 feet (175 m) to 1000 feet (300 m). At its widest point the pass is about 450 feet (135 m) across, and at its thinnest it is a mere 10 feet (3 m) wide. Despite this, two highways currently go through the pass connecting Peshawar with Kabul. One highway is used for traditional caravan traffic, while a second is used for modern motorized vehicles. The Khyber Pass is inhabited by the Pathans, a group of Pashto-speaking tribes. Pakistan nominally controls the pass, but in reality it is administered by the Pathans. The Pathans are very traditional, and are known to be very fierce fighters.

This pass is arguably the most important pass in history, with countless invasions and migrations using it to traverse the Hindu Kush. Some historians believe that it was used by the Indo-Aryans on their way to Indus Valley and India proper around 1500 BCE. This would make them the first major invasion of the Indian subcontinent to have used the pass.

Later, in the 6th century BCE, Darius the Great led his Persians through the Khyber Pass to expand the Achaemenian Empire into Indus Valley Region. Two centuries later, Alexander the Great followed in Darius’ footsteps leading his own army to India through the pass, but only after bribing local Pathan chiefs to allow him free passage. The Huns, the Scythians, the Afghans, all used the pass during their various conquests.

In the 10th century Islam made its way to Indus Valley through the Khyber Pass. Subuktagin began his invasion of parts of India through this pass, and his son later used the pass nearly twenty times in his own campaigns. In the 16th century Zahirurddin Babur led his army through it, using it to establish the mighty Mughal Empire in India, cementing Islam’s place as a major religion on the sub-continent. When the British Raj seized India, they watched the Khyber Pass with great concern. It was through the Khyber Pass that they feared a Russian invasion, and for many years the British attempted to seize control of the pass from the Pathans. During the First Afghan War the British suffered massive losses against the Pathans, before eventually recruiting the tribes to fight British army.

The language, dress, culture and temperament are totally different. Perhaps, afghans are not even Indo-Aryans but are Jewish by race. Pushto is as old as Persia itself. Hebrew, Persian, Sanskrit and Pashto are the four oldest languages, though the languages, by virtue of proximity have borrowed words from each other.

For centuries a trade and invasion route from central Asia, the Khyber Pass was one of the principal approaches of the armies of Alexander the Great, Timur, Babur, Mahmud of Ghazna, and Nadir Shah in their invasions of Indus Valley Region.

The iconic Bab-e-Khyber, the gateway to the Khyber Pass, in honour of Pakistan’s Heritage. Built in 1964 near the Jamrud Fort, the Bab-e-Khyber has come to symbolize this historic passage between East and West, connecting Peshawar in Pakistan and Kabul in Afghanistan. For centuries the mountainous Khyber Pass was a vital part of the Silk Road, a pathway for trade and migration that also saw Alexander the Great’s army march through. On this day in 1947, Pakistan attained sovereignty after decades of colonial rule by the British Raj. In Urdu, this national holiday is known as Yom-e-Istiqlal. The whole nation begins celebrating at the stroke of midnight, with the main festivities taking place in the capital city of Islamabad. National leaders attend a flag-raising ceremony followed by cultural events and parades with proud Pakistani citizens dressed in green and white, the national colours. Those same colours can be seen on the national flag, which flies on government buildings and private homes alike. Independence Day is also marked by solemn ceremonies at the tombs of leaders like Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Muhammad Iqbal, the poet and politician whose 1930 speech inspired Pakistan’s independence movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.36.28 (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

92.41.36.28 Request a redirect with reference which says National passageway of Pakistan is alternate name or anyway used for Khyber Pass. Long texts won't help. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Please Review My Page

I see that you originally denied my AfC request. I've resubmitted for review and have addressed your concerns. I hope you will take a second look at my page and accept for creation. Thank you, Meshell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ralina_Joseph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimilea1991 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mimilea1991, I would leave it for any other reviewer. I see, there is a COI issue. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Zakat

As I have stated on the talk page I am not comfortable with this topic and hence wouldn't feel correct giving my opinion for the consensus. Need to read more which will take time. Please go ahead and make whatever changes you need to. If someone has a problem it can be rectified as and when it occurs. Regards. DTM (talk) 12:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

DTM, I'm literary laughing. The section has been already removed back on 31 March 2020. 😄 - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
opps, 😅 DTM (talk) 05:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Yehiel Gozal

Hello there, I dont understand why you declined this draft.. this is clearly a person worthy of an article as well as there are amny cites and sources. I have resubmitted it (will add a few more sources) and ask you to kindly give it a second look... Thank you. Dovlib19 (talk) 07:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Dovlib19: Biography and Military section and later subsections are unsourced still.- Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muhammad Taqi Amini

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Muhammad Taqi Amini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Muhammad Taqi Amini

The article Muhammad Taqi Amini you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Muhammad Taqi Amini for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AhmadLX -- AhmadLX (talk) 18:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Help develop articles

I know wikipedia gat other cool stuffs but please help update and create article. One of the thing is zee music please look at the talk page see my suggestion and how we can enable that.Tbiw (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@Tbiw: Can you provide me the link? Thanks. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting this offer. I will first give you the zee music link zee music. If we start to look into India articles that are undone we do a lot. I want you to also improve Zee Bollynova the structure is not so good. In Zee World let create help more articles. Let also help in completing plot summary of some shows. Please let improve Dehli darlings it is an ongoing show I want people to know about it. Thanks I will appreciate if you can help look into this. The best you did is that you accepted the offer thanks man. Tbiw (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Tbiw, there's nothing like I have accepted the offer. If you think the articles need any improvement, you're free to improve them. I may do my part, if possible. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 08:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay cool. I did not mean all job on you. Tbiw (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, AaqibAnjum

Thank you for creating Karwan-I-Islami.

User:Naypta, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, I've just chatted with the user who wrote this article on IRC, and I've significantly tidied up the grammar of the article, along with improving the quality of the inline citations. I think it probably meets GNG in the way it is now, as there's at least three sources that I think meet SIGCOV - I'd appreciate a second opinion though, if you have a moment. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Naypta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 09:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@Naypta: I am satisfied. There is also good coverage in Urdu sources. The organization is definitely notable. Thanks - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Semwal

Please could you add Semwal to your watch list. If you look at the article history you will see why. If you think that the IP editor's edits were good, please post a message on the article talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done - Dear Toddy1, I've added it to my watchlist. However, I'm running on 2g Internet. I'll try my best. Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jitendra Soni

Hi Aaqib, Well i am not able to understand that you have declined this draft, this person is worthy to be included as an article on wiki. I have resubmitted the article by making some changes. Please go through it and do let me know if i am doing something wrong. Thank you!!! Pkpunjab(talk)

@Pkpunjab: Decline is not reject. After having a look on draft again, I see you've improved it and there are already editors like Toddy1 checking it. Have patience and wait for another AfC review. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
@Pkpunjab: When people give you feedback, it is to help you do better. The feedback on Draft:Jitendra Soni was as follows:
You can see that User:Theroadislong did a copy edit at 11:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC) to address tone.[2]
That leaves the layout issue unaddressed. Let us look at the structure of an example article, Saeeda Imtiaz:
  1. lede - (note there is no heading for the lede) - this consists of one or more sentences that summarise the article, and tells the reader why the subject is notable.
  2. Early life
  3. Career
  4. Filmography - this is her list of works. You have one of these for Draft:Jitendra Soni, which is good.
  5. References - You have one of these for Draft:Jitendra Soni
  6. External links - You have one of these for Draft:Jitendra Soni
In Draft:Jitendra Soni, there is no lede. There is a bit on his early life in the first paragraph, all the rest of the bit before the first section heading is on his career. It should not be too difficult to restructure the existing content into an early life and a career section. Then you need to write two sentences that summarise, and put that as the lede.
Further improvement is possible. Can you find out the circumstances in which he saved 8 lives? What happened? Can you tell the story? If there are reliable sources that say what happened, then tell the story. What happened is far more interesting than his getting an award for it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello

I gave a link there but yeah alright. Take care of yourselves. Mubashirsyed014 (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Karwan-I-Islami

Thanks for your feedback You seem to be a Muslim Probably a kashmiri Muslim (your user page). If you are interested than you can also contribute in this article .Most probably you are aware of this organization more than me thanksMariyaibrahim (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Assalamu Alykum Mariyaibrahim; You get it right. Sorry for the contributions part because I do not know Kashmiri organisations except for few Darul Uloom's like Darul Uloom Raheemiyyah and other top institutions. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Academic studies from regional universities (from countries like India and Pakistan) are often biased or unverifiable. They often contain large portions without any inline citations or references.

Note: Feel free to add references from top Indian universitis like the Delhi University, the J. N. U., the Jamia or the Aligarh.

PSS: Eid Mubarak!! MohamdRizwwa (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

If you feel so, you can raise a request at WP:RSN, but as of now academic studies from valid universities ain't depreciated. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Kindly help regarding article Vicky Manhas

This article is tagged for speedy deletion. Kindly revert it back. You can search about Vicky Manhas on Google also. He is working under label Kalpanik Films.

The reason why I am interested in this article is only that he is artist from Jammu and Kashmir. TheChunky (talk) 03:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Non-administrators can only contest the deletion. If an admin finds out the deletion tag to be geniune, they delete the article and if otherwise, they decline speedy deletion. The speedy deletion has been declined for that article. However, a friendly advise: create and improve articles in form of a sandbox or draft and once you are done with all sourcing, only then move to mainspace. You won't face any such problem then. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You. Brother. One more help required. The article is now counted as Wiki Item code attached to it.

I just search Google, and what I find there is a big error. Can you fix it.


The Google show separate tab for the same artist before this article. Now the article is attached to it. But it showing incorrectly bio.

When I search Vicky Manhas on Google

click to see results)

there the bio line says Kalpanik Films. Vicky Manhas (born 1993) is a rapper...

The word Kalpanik Films need to be removed to get shown it clearly.

Kalpanik Films is the label and inside the article Vicky Manhas, I have added in label. But I don't know how google indexed it above. TheChunky (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky: that's not a big problem. Its all done by bots. In the google search, there's a feedback option given, send a feedback to google mentioning the problem. Done. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok thanks bhai Jaan. Will do it after Iftar. I have heard 4G is going to restore in our Jammu and Kashmir, hope that will help us to improve our work more. TheChunky (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Best. Ping me if you need any help. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Numan765 (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Muhammad Sufyan Qasmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Sufyan Qasmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sufyan Qasmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Numan765 (talk) 09:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of All India Majlis Sada-e-Haq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All India Majlis Sada-e-Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Majlis Sada-e-Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Numan765 (talk) 10:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gori (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gori (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gori (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Numan765 (talk) 10:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Tip

It is one thing to reply to one comment you disagree with on an article for deletion discussion, but it is not a good idea to post a reply to all of them. This is especially true when you are essentially saying the same thing:

  1. Sorry but. Sources like Al Jazeera, BBC etc ain't non notable. On the Wikipedia, nothing is complete and nothing belongs to any single editor. If creating editor does a mistake, other users rectify it and this is how Wikipedia works. The national and international reliable independent media coverage passes WP:SIGCOV and so, WP:GNG. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 12:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  2. Would you like to expand your vote? How is the subject not notable of having WP when they have received significant coverage in reliable national and international media including BBC, Al-Jazeera, Gulf News etc. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  3. Would you like to address the issues of national and international coverage? Which clearly passes WP:GNG. How doing protests against government is not notable? How protests ain't notable? - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  4. How do you say it fails SIGCOV and GNG when there's national and international coverage including BBC and Al Jazeera. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 09:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

The more often you say the same thing on the same page, the less people take any notice of anything you have said.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1, Thanks for the tip. I'll be taking care. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Would removing the duplicate comments be right? If yes, I will remove them. We participate in AfDs for a good outcome, not merely for Keep and Delete. I agree. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
No. Just learn the lesson.
There are various Wikipedia essays that contain advice based on experience of how things usually work. Since you seem to find yourself in deletion discussions, you might want to read some of them:
  • Wikipedia:Catch Once and Leave
  • Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
  • Feinberg, Ashley (14 March 2019), "Facebook, Axios And NBC Paid This Guy To Whitewash Wikipedia Pages, And it almost always works.", Huffington Post
-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm going to read these essays. Thanks very much for guiding me. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak to you عيد مبارك

Have you seen any Eid greeting template on Wikipedia as yet? DTM (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the wish DTM. No, I've not. We celebrated our Eid already. 😷 - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
But I wished on the correct day at least, right? DTM (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Yes. Exactly. Thanks a lot. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding help for this article

Asalamualaikum, I wrote the article Ababeel about 20-30 days back.

Actually, when I got news on National Media (mentioned in references of Ababeel) about harassment of volunteers due to it's name.

Actually this is an Charitable Trust (Regd.) founded in Chenab Valley of Jammu and Kashmir. The work done on ground level is 10x more than it covered online. Due to some policies of this trust, they don't show their faces in videos for preventing Arrogance in them.(belief)

Read out the article you will get to know what it is.

Now the main problem is, I didn't know how to fix the minor edits by which bots index it on Google.

If anyone search Ababeel on Google, it shows Ababeel (Missile) article on top. This is the main reason, police harassed them. When anyone wants to know about this organization online. First result make another image. Due to which Many people call them anti national etc. According to a news report about FIR on 8 volunteers of Ababeel while distributing food to poor.


Look at the article.

Fix the grammar, references, and format.

Thank You TheChunky (talk) 07:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky:,  Done: made a move to Ababeel (NGO), please add citations to the history section, so that it becomes verifiable. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
and please follow the citation format when you add references. See some at any of my articles. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

It is not NGO actually. It is just called as NGO.

As per their registration record I got. It is registered as Charitable Trust. And no NGO work is done by them.

They only do everything from Charity donations. TheChunky (talk) 07:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear TheChunky we mostly use common name in the titles and avoid full registration name, only because it is known to people as so. If you feel there can be words like organization fitting in title, feel free in making a page move. Best - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Actually they believe that only Charity (Zakat, Sadkaat) should be used to help people. No funds from Government. As per their religious belief. And I think article should be known as what actually it is.


And also as per research Ababeel NGO is a registered NGO in Assam.

Ababeel is a charitable organization. TheChunky (talk) 07:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

The word organization is not good in TITLE.

I thought only word Ababeel should be there. Because there is not article which use only word Ababeel. TheChunky (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky:, please have a look at Wikipedia:Article titles. Hope it helps. What about using the title Ababeel (charity organisation) - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I think Ababeel NGO is good than this. Cuz that is known as NGO. Whatever, if anyone reads the article get all the clearance. What actually it is.


Now kindly set the References in good manner as I know only simple referencing. Also check grammar in this. So that google index it easily. TheChunky (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Muhammad Taqi Usmani

Dear friend. السلام عليكم و رحمة الله تعالى وبركاته. I hope you are fine. Can you please look at the Muhammad Taqi Usmani page. There’s a disruptive editor. Many thanks, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Wa alykumus salam. Alright. Fighting such vandals is one of the most difficult task here. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Muhammad Qasim Nanautawi

Wikipedia is not a forum and definitely not one to discuss sectarianism. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 06:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh habibi

You seem to be putting out false information about Deobandi leader and refusing to allow to honest and objective statements. You are clearly a Deobandi because you post Deobandi scholars on your page. It is not objective or impartial for a Deobandi to be controlling pages about Deobandis and giving undue praise and credit to them. It is an exaggerated and unrealistic claim that a Deobandi scholar is Hujjat al Islam among Imam Ghazali. This is not recognized by scholars outside the Indian cultural sphere. Please stop attempting to hinder other Muslims from making statements especially when those statements are fair and objective. Eid Mubarak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk) 05:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Wa Alykumus salam. You may add a neutral statement, that he is regarded as Hujjat al-Islam by his followers, without issuing the fatwa's in edit summaries as you did earlier. In various independent works, his name is titled with Hujjat al-Islam. You need to check WP:NPOV. Definitely, you shouldn't edit war when a fellow editor disagrees with you. Thanks for resorting to my talk page at last. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 05:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
My writing about Deobandi scholars doesn't make me wrong, everyone has his field of interest, so is mine. Hujjat al-Islam title isn't just used with Imam Ghazali, though more used with him. Wikipedia is definitely not for sectarianism. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 05:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia should not be for sectarianism, yet you said "Non-Deobandis? Its a lie. It is yet again Barelwism" 21:39, 18 May 2020‎ ... This is takfiri and sectarian which is exactly what I was correcting. Yes this scholar has been called Hujjat al Islam by several Deobandis but never by any Sunni Muslim outside the Deobandi movement. Deobandis are maybe a population of 50 million muslims at most, the remaining 1,850 million muslims do not want to get involved with Deobandi fighting Barelwi and Barelwi fighting Deobandi. Honestly my dear brother I mean this from a good place of love for my fellow Muslim, the fighting between Deobandi and Barelwi is making both groups look bad and hurting the name of Islam. Islam needs unity. Wikipedia cannot be bias to a certain group. There is no problem with me that you are Deobandi, but Barelwis make takfir against Deobandis and vice a versa. The rest of Sunni Muslims do not make takfir, but definitely do not give special titles to scholars of either group. That is only something that Deobandis and Barelwis do to their own scholars to try and sound good and make it seem like they are legitimate and represent all of Sunni Islam, which they do not. Sorry I did not message this board earlier, but I am not as skilled with wikipedia as you. I saw you made 10k edits, masha Allah. I have probably made 10! hahaha. Sorry I did not even know there was a page for you or a way for us to communicate. I promise you honestly I have no problem with you or with Deobandi. I am Shafi'i student of knowledge at madrassah, I see you are also student of knowledge. Please just know that Islam is bigger than this little conflict in India. Sunni Muslims have no part of the Deobandi-Barelwi conflict and you need to stop dragging all Sunni Islam into this fight, actually you need to stop fighting at all! Make peace with the Barelwis. Nothing about Deobandi is superior to Barelwi and also Barelwi is not superior to Deobandi. I hope your madrassah is not teaching you to look down at Barelwi because that would be a bad character and harmful to the Ummah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk)
I replied that due to your earlier edit summaries which spew hate, that salah behind Deobandi's is not valid. That's completely violation of Wp policy of WP:NPOV plus, don't assume where do I study. I wouldn't have reverted your edit, if you had not dragged it unnecessarily to where it didn't belonged. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
That is untrue. Firstly, my edit was simply to correct the false claim that Sunnis see Nanautavi as Hujjat al Islam. You undid that, so I edited again with my references. You undid that again. I added even more references this time I included the fact that a movement which is larger in size to the Deobandi movement makes takfir against the Deobandis. Look at the facts objectively. Sunnis do not consider Nanautavi to be Hujjat al Islam. Barelwis consider him to be a kafir. Deobandis consider him to be equal to or better than scholars like Imam Ghazali. These are the facts. Being fair and objective shows that Nanautavi does not represent Sunni Islam. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write your opinions or have debates. Wikipedia should be a fair and objective encyclopedia which states the facts from all sides. Yes Nanautavi is considered Hujjat al Islam by his followers, but not by the rest of Sunni Islam. I never stated anything hateful, and the idea you would say my edit spew hate is so hyperbolic is makes me wonder if there is any use talking to you. I never said solah behind Deobandi is invalid. I reference a fatwa from Barelwis which said so in the comment section so that normal readers would not see it, but this mysterious person who keeps erasing my references because he did not like what he saw could read it and realize that he is being totally biased and irrational. Besides, that fact was mentioned only because I was repeatedly blocked from stating the fact that Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah does not recognize any Hujjat al Islam except for Imam Ghazali, so I repeatedly had to come back with more evidence and references. The truth is that Deobandi scholars are not studied or revered outside of the Indian cultural sphere, and even within the Indian cultural sphere they are a minority. Barelwis have more followers and the Grand Mufti of India was a Barelwi before the recent Shafi'i one was elected. By the way, I did not assume where you study ... it is posted on your page ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk)
69.144.111.231, Give me some time to go through your edits. In India, every single Darul Ifta has its own Grand Mufti. The incumbent is at dispute on the related article. That's not a good example. As of the former, he was regarded as Grand Mufti of Barelwis only, and not of all Indian Sunni Muslims. Ahlussunnah wal Jama’ah is not limited to few groups. And definitely using takfiri fatwas is attack on Wikipedia, because we need a independent, neutral, reliable source to reference any claim. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I would be analysing each of the sources and edits you made to this article, and answer to your claim that The revered scholar is respected outside India as well. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 08:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do look at the various sources I cited. Several academic articles and books. As to the fatwa it would be partisan if I posted the fatwa as if it was a fact. A fatwa is a legal ruling, not a fact. However, to say the Barelwis have such and such a fatwa would be a statement of objective fact, which is exactly what I did. I simply stated the objective fact that Barelwis make takfir of Deobandis, and likewise I could mention fatawa of Deobandis who make takfir of Barelwis. These are neutral statements of fact without taking sides, rather simply pointing out the position of both sides. Brother Deobandis are not studied or known outside of the Deobandi movement, and they are less well known than the Barelwis who are larger in number. Saying the Barelwis are larger in number is also a statement of fact, totally neutral. I never said which group is better in my opinion because Wikipedia is not a place for opinions. Let the facts speak for themselves. And yes the Grand Mufti of India was rejected by Deobandis, but accepted by Hanafis (non affiliated), Barelwis, and Shafi'is. He is elected by the Electoral College. It is not for one person to reject him just because he does not agree. That is very partisan and sectarian. When someone you do not like gets elected he is still your leader. That is how things work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
You're totally going the wrong side. Deobandi Hanafi ulama and mashayikh have been known world-wide, from Africa to America and Australia to Europe. The particular BIO pages ain't there to mention at the lead that so and so makes takfir. Is Wikipedia a new takfir machine? Just because you haven't known them, doesn't make them unknown. Plus, there's no electoral college here. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Brother you are the one who makes takfir against the Barelwis. "Barelwism" is not a thing. I point out facts. I am objective. You are the one trying to assert your agenda. I simply tried to stop you from claiming to speak for all Sunnis when you speak for Deobandis, not all Sunnis. The comment I make about Barelwis making takfir was never on the wiki page. It was not on the bio page at all, it was pointing out a fatwa to you in the edit comments.. that Deobandis are far from normative Sunni thought, in fact a group makes takfir of them, so obviously they are not normative Sunni Islam. Secondly, you can believe what you want about Deobandis being known all around the world. It is a very haughty world view. That self importance is one thing which makes people who learn about the Deobandi movement turn away from them. Deobandis are only in the Indian cultural sphere, and a minority of the Indian cultural sphere at that. Yeh you can find Deobandis anywhere you find Indian immigrants who are Deobandi (UK, south Africa, Trinidad, etc) but you can also find Barelwis there. You will not find any Deobandis who are not Indian. It is an ethnic religious movement which strayed from normative Sunni thought. That is why they have their own name and their own scholars instead of following the scholars which the rest of Sunni Muslims follow. Even taking the books of Ibn Abidin and Abu Hanifa and teaching them in different ways than the rest of Hanafis I know in Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Turkey, etc. Believe me or not, that is your choice. Try to learn more about Islam from normative Sunni thought, not Deobandi movement. Study with a Hanafi who is not from Deobandi movement and you will see a whole different world than what the Deobandis have been telling you about. See Islam and see the world for yourself, do not just take people's narratives as if they are facts. Allah bless you and increase you and draw you near amin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nomination of Noor Alam Khalil Amini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noor Alam Khalil Amini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noor Alam Khalil Amini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KST981 (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Vipin Kumar Tripathi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vipin Kumar Tripathi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipin Kumar Tripathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KST981 (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha Badhwar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Natasha Badhwar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KST981 (talk) 09:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Archiving

As you know canvassing is wrong (see Wikipedia:Canvassing). It is nevertheless useful for people who might be interested to know that a discussion is taking place. If people post a notice on your talk page of a discussion at WP:ANI, or a deletion discussion, or the placing of a speedy deletion tag, then people who have your talk page on their watch list may find the information useful. Your talk page is not just for you. If you archive too soon, then people who have similar interests to yourself will miss out on the opportunity to contribute.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Exactly dear. I never thought that my talk page has that much importance lol. - I'm changing the archiving frequency today onwards. Thanks for teaching me a new lesson. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:47, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Aafi, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Adoption

I saw that you are adopting new user. I have also added Adopt me tag on my userpage.

Can you help me in learning Wikipedia. I don't know how to add tags to get adopted. TheChunky (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky:  Done - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

What to do now? Do we get connected here or we connect on social media? Or something else? TheChunky (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll be designing a separate page in my userspace. I'll ping you once I'm done. Best - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Ayushi podder article

Hi, I am not a professional wikipedian and I did few edits only. To this article I started adding content and doing citations. It asked me to add categories but I don't know how. You help me rather getting it deleted please Vishal 12:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalttplayer (talk • contribs)

Dear Vishalttplayer, Copyvios tool noticed about 95% copy right violation, and it is against Wikipedia policies. If you are about to improve it, I'll move it to Draft, where you can expand it, and later submit through AfC. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Numan765

Asalamualaikum brother, I don't know why you mentioned me in this conversation subjected above.

I am new. Can you please elaborate things what are that?

Kya mujhse koi mistake huwi ha kahi???? TheChunky (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Wa Alykumus salam. Dear TheChunky you made no mistake. You may see WP:SPI to see that what the discussion is all about. As I saw behavior of Numan765, and other user who AfDed your created article Ababeel (NGO). Both, AfDed a number of articles created by me and Ngrewal1 and also one of your articles. It made me assume they are not two but one. At Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Numan765, I have put forth my analysis to the behavior of these two accounts being one. If you also can analyse any part of their behavior which violates Wikipedia policies, you can add comments there. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
In Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Numan765, where it says "suck" do you mean "sock"? The words have different meanings.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
@Toddy1: Oops, typo. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
I looked into two of your allegations:
  • That Numan and KST981 are sock puppets of Sturdyankit. The editor interaction analyser shows that the only page that Sturdyankit has edited that either Numan or KSt have edited is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safoora Zargar. The diff you showed merely meant that KST981 was agreeing with the reasoning given by Sturdyankit. Since Sturdyankit made good arguments, that is not surprising. I see no evidence that they are socks of Sturdyankit. And in any case, you have not listed Sturdyankit as a suspect to be looked at by Checkuser/
  • That both Numan and KST981 welcome new editors. This is interesting - and I have tried to explain why this is suggestive. Both Numan and KST981 use the Twinkle tool for this. And many (but not all) of the editors welcomed have made no contributions.
-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
@Toddy1:. That's good work you have done. I assumed due to the diff I attached that possibly they are both his socks, but that is necessarily not true. And this is why I said "I assume so and there is someone else" and that thing came in my head later, when I had opened the SPI. And it is first ever SPI case I opened. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

What is this Urdu title?

Assalamu alaikum brother,

Hope you are doing well in shaa Allah. I know this is probably a silly question, but could you please take a look at this image and type the title in Urdu? I'm struggling to figure it out; I thought it might be پرچھائی, but the image has two dots under one of the ی, which isn't the case in my guess...

Jazak Allah khair, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 23:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Wa Alykumus salam, Dear brother M Imtiaz - It could have been پرچھائی, only if there was no Noon Ghuna at the end. It has a noon ghuna and thus shall be transliterated or read as Parchhayeen. At [Library System, M.D.University, Rohtak], it says parchaayen. I am damn sure it is the same. It is پرچھائیں in Urdu. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Excellent, brother! I am truly grateful for your help. May Allah bless you, M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 20:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Ibn Adam

Do you have access to Ibn Adam's book? If so, can you email it to me?VR talk 22:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@Vice regent: I've sent an email. Looking forward. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

The placement of citations

Salam my dear friend. I hope you are fine. Actually the citations were not “right there”. They were far below in the paragraph, and quite a long way down at that. It will help if you don’t add too many individual points and then rely only on a citation at the end. Thanks so much. Best wishes ever, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Titles and honorifics

Salam again my dear friend, your articles are a great credit to Wikipedia. They provide important information and are well constructed. I’m very glad to work with you on their copy editing. Please allow me to make what I hope will be a useful observation. On Wikipedia we aren’t supposed to use titles (such as Sheikh, Dr, Imam, Rev or Hon) or honorifics (Sayed, Maulana, Hadrat, Hadhrat, Hazret, Qari, Hajji, etc). Two sets of useful guidelines are Wikipedia WP:MOSISLAM, which says “In keeping with the neutral nature of Wikipedia, Islamic honorifics should generally be omitted from articles (whether Arabic or English), except where they are part of quotations”, and WP:CREDENTIAL. Also, on English Wikipedia we should not use Arabic or other languages for words or phrases than can be said accurately in English ((Muhaddith = scholar of hadith, tafsir = commentary etc). I offer this as advice and not as criticism and thank you again for your great work. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

@GorgeCustersSabre: Thanks a lot. Azhar Shah Qaiser, Anzar Shah Kashmiri, Muhammad Miyan Deobandi etc are articles which I created when I was new to Wikipedia, and definitely there would be MOS issues. You won't find such issues in my recently created articles like Noor Alam Khalil Amini. Thank's again for the note. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
AaqibAnjum You’re right. I can see great progress as an editor. I’m proud of you. If you think any page needs my attention, please let me know. It’s fun for me. Best wishes always, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
GorgeCustersSabre, However, I was in kashmakash about Hafiz Muhammad Ahmad, I tried to use Muhammad Ahmad Nanautawi and then saw it is rarely used, and then tried Muhammad Ahmad, I was confused about it as common name but then added Hafiz with the title as Barbara Metcalf had used. If you think it too needs a move, go with it. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 12:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Tatfazani

as salamu alaykum. Please avoid an edit war reverting edits needlessly and without cause. Wikipedia is a place for collecting the best information on a subject and a edit with source is better than a revert without source. You might be flagged for edit waring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.111.231 (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

User:AaqibAnjum/All India Majlis Sada-e-Haq

Userfied per request Spartaz Humbug! 22:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Use of fake video on YouTube as a source

If the editor responsible for the following edits reverts you again at Safoora Zargar, my advice would be to report him/her/it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.

  1. 02:28, 6 June 2020 by CaptchaGotcha
  2. 18:28, 6 June 2020 by CaptchaGotcha
  3. 18:31, 6 June 2020 by CaptchaGotcha

Please note that the editor has received two warnings for edit warring at User talk:CaptchaGotcha#June 2020 at 20:57, 6 June 2020 and 21:02, 6 June 2020

An attempt has been made to resolve the issue on the article talk page at Talk:Safoora Zargar#Use of fake video on YouTube as a source.

It is probably not a good idea to revert again.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your contributions to the WP. Looking forward to future cooperation. Störm (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Dear Störm, it would be my pleasure to help you. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

i wanna be adopted

Assalam Alaikum! I am a fellow muslim, and I'd like to be under your mentorship. I am currently working on the Libyan and Afghan wars so far. BlookyNapsta (talk) 02:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aafi/Archive_2&oldid=1212833235"