User talk:ASHFAK COYON

This is ASHFAK COYON's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: MD. GIAS UDDIN (December 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Tagishsimon (talk) 19:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ASHFAK COYON! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 19:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MD. GIAS UDDIN (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Facebook, Instagram, and other Wikipedia articles are not valid sources, per WP:RS. Also, please read WP:CAPSLOCK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MD. GIAS UDDIN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MD. GIAS UDDIN, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 11:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakaria Korak Biddayapith

A tag has been placed on Chakaria Korak Biddayapith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Em-em ^talk 07:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Chakaria Korak Biddayapith. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 07:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ASHFAK COYON

A tag has been placed on ASHFAK COYON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MD. GIAS UDDIN

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on MD. GIAS UDDIN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Northern Escapee (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MD. GIAS UDDIN (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a resume service. Needs more external news sources. Also do not write the entire article in all caps.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MD. GIAS UDDIN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MD. GIAS UDDIN, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MD. GIAS UDDIN

A tag has been placed on MD. GIAS UDDIN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Northern Escapee (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ASHFAK COYON

A tag has been placed on User:ASHFAK COYON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 18:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MD. GIAS UDDIN

A tag has been placed on MD. GIAS UDDIN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone 22:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ASHFAK COYON -- I have moved this to draftspace for you to continue working on it: Draft:Gias Uddin. I am not sure whether or not the subject is sufficiently notable to be included in the encyclopedia; you will need to provide more reliable independent sources that discuss his contributions in depth; newspapers, books and magazines are ideal.

I suggest, as a first step, you convert it from capitals to sentence case, which will make it easier to read. Is ISDE the International Society of Doctors for the Environment? This should be expanded and linked. Full referencing to reliable sources is also needed for all facts in an article about a living person. I have tagged the draft with the WP:Articles for creation template; when you are ready for review, I strongly suggest asking their reviewers to look at it by following the instructions in the grey box at the top. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your interest in a Bangladesh-related topic. However, article talk pages such as Talk:MD. GIAS UDDIN are for discussion related to improving (a) the corresponding encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for mirroring the article text. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines for more information about the appropriate use of talk pages. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Integrated Social Development Effort (ISDE) Bangladesh

A tag has been placed on Draft:Integrated Social Development Effort (ISDE) Bangladesh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SK2242 (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ASHFAK COYON. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ASHFAK COYON

A tag has been placed on ASHFAK COYON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone 18:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at ASHFAK COYON. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Spiderone 18:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of THE AROUND VIEW NEWSPAPER

A tag has been placed on THE AROUND VIEW NEWSPAPER requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pahunkat (talk) 18:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ASHFAK COYON (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)SORRY. I FIND THIS WEBSITE IN ONLINE I CAN'T DO THIS TYPE OF THING ANY MORE.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ASHFAK COYON (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)RESPECTFUL ADMINISTRATOR I KNEW I BLOKED FOR CREATING SPAM ARTICLE. I AM SORRY FOR THIS. I ALSO READ THE GUIDELINES IN FUTURE BEFORE ADDING ANYTHING . I APOLOGISE AGAIN AND AGAIN .I ALSO NEED HELP WHERE SHOULD I DISCUSS WITH YOU . PLEASE FORGIVE ME. THANKS.[reply]

Decline reason:

You are supposed to read the guidelines before you make an appeal and use the appeal to demonstrate to us that you have understood them. Your appeal does not demonstrate the necessary proficiency in written English needed for contributing constructively. And please stop shouting. MER-C 19:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of THE AROUND VIEW NEWSPAPER

A tag has been placed on THE AROUND VIEW NEWSPAPER, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone 19:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE THE SENIOR EDITOR I APOLOGISE. HOW CAN I CONTACT WITH YOURS? PLEASE SAY THE MEDIUM.I DO THIS THING BECAUSE I AM NEW ..IN FUTURE EVERYTHING WILL ASK FROM YOURS

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ASHFAK COYON (talk) AGAIN APOLOGISE... I PROMISE THAT I NEVER BREAK THE RULE AGAIN.. I WILL FOLLOW THE RULE.. I SWARE....I PROMISE..PLEASE UNBLOCK ME... IN FUTURE I ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES OF WIKIPEDIA... FORGIVE ME...🙏🙏🙏Bold text

Decline reason:

As you were told above by MER-C - you are supposed to read the guidelines you've been linked, and use the appeal function to demonstrate to us that you understand them. I'm not honestly sure that you understand the reason that you are blocked.

And, again, there is no reason to type in all caps. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of User:ASHFAK COYON/ISDE BANGLADESH

The page User:ASHFAK COYON/ISDE BANGLADESH has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ASHFAK COYON (talk) 05:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)RESPECTFUL ADMINISTRATOR, AFTER READING FULL GUIDELINES PROVIDED BY WIKIPEDIA I UNDERSTOOD THAT I ABUSE THIS SYSTEM. I MAKE PROMOTION/ADVERTISING AND EDIT ABOUT MYSELF WHICH IS PROHIBITED TO DO. I APOLOGIZE for THIS. IN FUTURE I STRICTLY FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES AND I WILL MAKE USEFUL CONTRIBUTION TO THE ENCYCLOPEDIA.PLEASE UNBLOCK MY IP TOO.THANKS, HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND

Decline reason:

First, you need to not type in all capital letters. Typing in all capital letters is generally considered to be yelling and rude. Your IP will be unblocked when this account is unblocked. You will need to tell us what guidelines you have violated and what edits you want to make going forward, in order to demonstrate your understanding of said guidelines. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ASHFAK COYON (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Respectful Admin, I find that I am blocked because of editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. I am sorry for this.I regret for this .I should not do this types of work. In last 8 hour I read many terms and conditions. In future i will careful about editing. Thanks. Finally I am really sorry.

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Begging for review my unblock request.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gias Uddin

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gias Uddin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ASHFAK COYON. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, I was blocked for creating an article on a organization which the admin remark as an advertising article. But it is not an advertising article, I am working as the tech advisor of this organization. Please hear what I want to tell then if you want you can block me. Hope you understand what I am saying. And I also added that I don't have multiple account. but I am use a shared IP network please review my account and I am pretty sure I definitely unblocked. I belives that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia where anyone don't add any fake thing. At last please forgive me for the past incident . In future I am careful about edit anything in wikipedia.ASHFAK COYON (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC):

Decline reason:

The unblock template is not a reply button. Again, please, only one open request at a time. SQL ^{Query me!} 19:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The account POTIMANCH was confirmed by a checkuser to be yours, editing in violation of your block, and it appeared to be a WP:DUCK since it recreated the same articles. Pahunkat (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NOT USING MULTIPLE ACCOUNT

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir it is our office network. About 35 person of the office use same network for office work.So any one can create this. Please review my account. In future i will be aware about it. Thanks ASHFAK COYON (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC):

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. And that's not a good defense. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@ASHFAK COYON: I recommend you see WP:MEATPUPPETRY. Steve M (talk) 21:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Steve M, Can i please contact you via email.my email is ashfakcoyon@gmail.com.ASHFAK COYON (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)::[reply]

Use shared Network

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ASHFAK COYON (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use a shared network.Please forgive me for this time and give the chance to edit.thanks ASHFAK COYON (talk) 10:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC):

Decline reason:

You were already told that was not a good enough defense. Since these requests are becoming repetitive, I am declining this request and removing talk page access to prevent more time wasting for everyone. Please review meatpuppetry. You may make an unblock request using WP:UTRS should your answers change significantly. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.