User talk:ARCRatings

Welcome!

Hello, ARCRatings, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:ARCRatings/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ARCRatings/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:ARCRatings/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ARCRatings! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ARCRatings (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AshleyThomas123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

It is to be noted that I am an affiliate of ARC Ratings being the Head of Structured Finance. I believe I was blocked too quickly, as this action occurred immediately, likely as the wikipedia page was perceived as a promotion due to the username, irrespective of the content that is constructive and beneficial to wikipedia users. All information included was written in a complimentary tone, which is reflective of my views and was modelled upon the available wikipedia page of other credit rating agencies within the sector. Nonetheless, I am making this appeal using my personal name to better reflect that these are my personal findings and perspective on ARC Ratings. This renders the block no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for, and will not do it again, and instead will make productive contributions. If granted the opportunity to have my account unblocked, I hope to contribute by shedding a neutral perspective on a range of areas in business and finance, where there is often misunderstandings and inaccessible information to wikipedia users.

Decline reason:

Your proposed username looks okay. Your edits included "ARC Ratings endeavours to be a world class rating agency through leading credit analysis that utilises cutting edge data evaluation to produce fast and accurate assessments of risk". If you do not grasp that is promotional, then I am doubtful you can be unblocked. If unblocked you would have to declare your paid status, and your conflict of interest, so in your next unblock request, please state your willingness to do this. I am not reassured by the topics you want to edit. They are within your conflict of interest, and I would want reassurance that you would not be denigrating your competition. PhilKnight (talk) 17:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the unnecessary duplicated unblocks and the nowiki tags that prevented the templates from rendering properly. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by ARC RATINGS for their contributions to Wikipedia.

conflict of interest

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ARCRatings (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AshleyThomas123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I apologize, I am new to wikipedia and am still grasping the various functions. I believe I have now included the proper disclosure that I am affiliated with ARC Ratings. Regarding that phrase, I am not too sure how to edit it whilst still being in the blocked position, however, it is the mission statement of the firm that is directly lifted from the website. I have taken time to review these areas and I can assure you I will not be denigrating other firms as this does not align with my personal values nor the objective of raising an awareness of the business and finance sector that I am seeking to do by contributing to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Mission statements are almost never appropriate for a Wikipedia article- as Wikipedia is mainly interested in what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not what it says about itself(a mission statement is the views of the organization as to its purpose and can change at any time). Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell about themselves. "Raising awareness of the business" is absolutely, 100% a promotional purpose(see WP:YESPROMO). Most people in your position have great difficulty with setting aside what they know about their organization and all materials it puts out(press releases, interviews, etc.) and limiting themselves to what others say about their organization. To know if you can do so, we will first want to see you make edits unrelated to your conflict of interest, as a demonstration of your understanding of relevant policies. Please tell us what articles or topics you might edit about. If you have no interest in being a general contributor, this is probably the end of the line. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]